No abstract

Objective To review clinical outcomes of patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) and vitreous hemorrhage (VH) who underwent pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with endolaser panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) without retinal detachment (RD) repair. Methods Retrospective chart review of the rate of postoperative clinical findings and visual acuity in patients with PDR from May 2014 to August 2021. Results Pars plana vitrectomy with endolaser PRP was performed in 81 eyes of 81 patients (mean age of 62.1 ± 10.5 years). At a median follow-up of 18 months, mean Snellen best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) significantly improved from 20/774 preoperatively to 20/53 at last follow-up ( P < 0.001). Postoperative complications and clinical findings included VH (12.3%), diabetic macular edema (DME) (12.3%), ocular hypertension (8.6%), RD (4.9%), and need for additional PPV (6.2%). Eyes with PRP performed within 6 months before surgery had a lower frequency of developing postoperative VH (5.3%) compared to eyes that received PRP more than 6 months before surgery (27.3%, P = 0.04). Eyes that received preoperative anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatment (2.0%) had a lower frequency of postoperative VH compared to eyes that did not receive anti-VEGF treatment (14.3%, P = 0.04). Eyes that received intraoperative sub-tenon triamcinolone acetonide developed postoperative DME (4.0%) less frequently than eyes that did not receive sub-tenon triamcinolone acetonide (26.7%, P = 0.04). Conclusion In patients with PDR and VH, PPV with PRP yielded significant improvements in visual acuity and resulted in overall low rates of recurrent postoperative VH. Preoperative anti-VEGF and PRP laser treatment were associated with lower rates of postoperative VH. Furthermore, intraoperative use of sub-tenon triamcinolone acetonide was associated with a lower rate of postoperative DME. Pars plana vitrectomy with endolaser PRP in conjunction with the aforementioned pre- and intraoperative therapies is an effective treatment for patients with PDR and VH.

Purpose To describe the indications, outcomes, and complications associated with intraocular lens (IOL) exchange. Patients and Methods To determine the relative frequency of postoperative complications between techniques for all patients undergoing IOL exchange from May 1, 2014 through August 31, 2020. Results IOL exchange was performed in 511 eyes of 489 patients (59.7% men; mean age: 67.0 ± 13.9 years, median time from cataract procedure to IOL exchange: 47.5 months). Mean uncorrected visual acuity significantly improved from 20/192 Snellen equivalent (logMAR 0.981) preoperatively to 20/61 (logMAR 0.487) at last follow-up ( P < 0.001). Overall, 384 eyes (78.7%) met their desired refractive outcome within ±1.0 diopter (D). The most frequent complication was cystoid macular edema (CME) (n=39, 7.6%). Iris-sutured technique was associated with significantly greater frequency of subsequent IOL dislocation (10.3%) than 4-point scleral sutured (0%, P = 0.002), anterior chamber IOL (ACIOL, 1.5%, P = 0.01), and 2-point scleral sutured (0%, P = 0.03) techniques. Yamane scleral-fixation technique was associated with significantly greater frequency of developing IOL tilt (11.8%) than ACIOL (0%, P = 0.002), 4-point scleral sutured (1.1%, P = 0.01), 2-point scleral sutured (0%, P = 0.04), and iris-sutured (0%, P = 0.04) techniques. Conclusion IOL exchange significantly improved uncorrected visual acuity and more than three-quarters of eyes met the refractive goal. Certain techniques were associated with complications, including subsequent dislocation associated with iris-sutured technique and IOL tilt associated with Yamane scleral-fixation technique. This information may help guide surgeons in deciding between procedural techniques for individual patients during IOL exchange preoperative planning.

Purpose: We evaluated the clinical outcomes of intraocular inflammation (IOI) of eyes with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) injected with brolucizumab in our tertiary referral center. Methods: A retrospective case series for which clinical records of all eyes that received intravitreal brolucizumab at Bascom Palmer Eye Institute between December 1, 2019, and April 1, 2021, were reviewed. Results: There were 345 eyes of 278 patients who received 801 brolucizumab injections. IOI was detected in 16 eyes of 13 patients (4.6%). In those patients, baseline Logarithm of Minimu Angle of Resolution (logMAR) best-corrected visual acuity was 0.32 0.2 (20/42), while it was 0.58 0.3 (20/76) at IOI presentation. The mean number of injections among eyes experiencing IOI was 2.4, and the interval between the last brolucizumab injection and IOI presentation was 20 days. There was no known case of retinal vasculitis. Management of IOI included topical steroids in seven eyes (54%), topical and systemic steroids in five eyes (38%), and observation in one eye (8%). Best-corrected visual acuity returned to baseline and inflammation resolved in all eyes by the last follow-up examination. Conclusion: Intraocular inflammation after brolucizumab injection for neovascular AMD was not uncommon. Inflammation resolved in all eyes by the last follow-up visit.