The aerodynamics of five complex bodies of revolution are investigated experimentally and theoretically at a low Mach number (M f ^ 0.1) and over the range of angle of attack from 0 to 35 deg. The geometrical forms of the bodies are generally complex with the discontinuities in the slope of the body surface. The surface-flow visualization is performed by using the oil method. The balance measurements were made and the results compared with the potential theory and the method based on the crossflow analogy. It was observed that the discontinuities in the slope of the body surface make the flow separation and consequently the flowfield very complicated. It was also found that the method of crossflow analogy is applicable not only to simple-type bodies of revolution but also the complex ones.
Nomenclatureof corresponding cylinder to body of revolution ( = S p /l) /(X) = normal force distribution / = total body length l r = reference length M^ = freestream Mach number M Coo = crossflow Mach number ( = M^ sina) q^ = freestream dynamic pressure (q^ = ^p R = local body radius Re d = Reynolds number based on the maximum body diameter d (Re d -V^d/v) R e cd s = crossflow Reynolds number based on d s ( = F^ sina ds/v) Re t -Reynolds number based on / S = local cross-sectional area ( = nR 2 ) S b = body base area S p = body planform area ( = Jo 2R d*) S r = reference area S, = body flat-nose area V^ = freestream velocity W = body volume ( = &nR 2 d*) x= body axis (axial distance from body nose) x c = axial distance from body nose to centroid of body planform area x cp = axial distance from body nose to center of pressure x m = pitching moment center (axial distance from body nose to pitching moment center) a = angle of attack p = density of air D = kinematic viscosity of air r\ -correction factor for influence of fineness ratio
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.