Rationale:The genus Pericopsis includes four species of which only Pericopsis elata (Harms) Meeuwen is of commercial interest. Enforcement officers might have difficulties discerning this CITES-listed species (Appendix II) from some other tropical African timber species. Therefore, we tested several methods to separate and identify these species rapidly in order to enable customs to uncover illegal trade. In this study, two classification methods using DART TOFMS data to discern between several species are presented.
Methods:Metabolome profiles were collected using DART TOFMS analysis of heartwood specimens of all four Pericopsis species, Haplormosia monophylla (Harms) Harms, Dalbergia melanoxylon Guill. & Perr. Harms, and Milicia excelsa (Welw.) C.C.Berg. In total, 95 specimens were analysed and the spectra evaluated. The species were chosen based on their importance in CITES, belonging to the same genus, and wood morphological resemblance. Kernel Discriminant Analysis (KDA) and Random Forest classification were used to discern the species.
Results:DART TOFMS spectra obtained from wood slivers and post-processing analysis using KDA and Random Forest classification separated Pericopsis elata from the other Pericopsis taxa and its lookalike timbers Haplormosia monophylla, Milicia excelsa, and Dalbergia melanoxylon. Only 50 ions were needed to achieve the highest accuracy.
Conclusions:DART TOFMS spectra of the taxa were reproducible and the results of the chemometric analysis provided comparable accuracy. Haplormosia monophylla was visually distinguished based on the heatmap and was excluded from further analysis. Both classification methods, KDA and Random Forest, were capable of distinguishing Pericopsis elata from the other Pericopsis taxa, Milicia excelsa, and Dalbergia melanoxylon, timbers commonly traded.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.