Calcium phosphate (CaP)-based ceramics are the most widely applied synthetic biomaterials for repair and regeneration of damaged and diseased bone. CaP bioactivity is regulated by a set of largely intertwined physico-chemical and structural properties, such as the surface microstructure, surface energy, porosity, chemical composition, crystallinity and stiffness. Unravelling the role of each individual property in the interaction between the biomaterial and the biological system is a prerequisite for evolving from a trial-and-error approach to a design-driven approach in the development of new functional biomaterials. This progress report critically reviews various strategies developed to decouple the roles of the individual material properties in the biological performance of CaP ceramics. It furthermore emphasizes on the importance of a comprehensive and adequate material characterization that is needed to enhance our knowledge of the property-function relationship of biomaterials used in bone regeneration, and in regenerative medicine in general.
Organ‐on‐chip models, developed using microengineering and microfluidic technologies, aim to recreate physiological‐like microenvironments of organs or tissues as a tool to study (patho)physiological processes in vitro. On‐chip models of bone are relevant for the study of bone physiology, diseases and regenerative processes. While a few bone‐on‐a‐chip models exist, recapitulating the cellular components of bone, these models do not incorporate the chemical and structural characteristics of bone tissue. Herein, the development of a bone‐on‐a‐chip platform is reported that comprises a 3D structural model of bone. To build the platform, first, a 3D model of bone is produced in a polymer using two‐photon polymerization (2PP) from a 3D nano‐computed tomography scan of trabecular bone. This 3D model is then coated with a layer of bone mineral‐like calcium phosphate. Finally, the 3D bone model is integrated inside a microfluidic device suitable for cell culture. Human mesenchymal stromal cells, cultured inside the platform for up to 21 days, show high viability and extensive production of extracellular matrix, rich in collagen. This biomimetic bone‐on‐a‐chip platform can contribute to a better understanding of the processes related to bone formation and remodeling, which in turn can be used for the development of bone regeneration strategies.
Bioprinting is a promising emerging technology. It has been widely studied by the scientific community for the possibility to create transplantable artificial tissues, with minimal risk to the patient. Although the biomaterials and cells to be used are being carefully studied, there is still a long way to go before a bioprinter can easily and quickly produce printings without harmful effects on the cells. In this sense, we have developed a new μ-extrusion bioprinter formed by an Atom Proton 3D printer, an atmospheric enclosure and a new extrusion-head capable to increment usual printing velocity. Hence, this work has two main objectives. First, to experimentally study the accuracy and precision. Secondly, to study the influence of flow rates on cellular viability using this novel μ-extrusion bioprinter in combination with a standard FDM 3D printing nozzle. Our results show an X, Y and Z axis movement accuracy under 17 μm with a precision around 12 μm while the extruder values are under 5 and 7 μm, respectively. Additionally, the cell viability obtained from different volumetric flow tests varies from 70 to 90%. So, the proposed bioprinter and nozzle can control the atmospheric conditions and increase the volumetric flow speeding up the bioprinting process without compromising the cell viability.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.