Amyloid-beta (Aβ) peptides are the major neuropathological hallmarks related with Alzheimer's disease (AD). Aβ peptides trigger several biochemical mechanisms of neurotoxicity, including neuroinflammation and glutamatergic neurotransmission impairment. Guanosine is the endogenous guanine-derived nucleoside that modulates the glutamatergic system and the cellular redox status, thus acting as a neuroprotective agent. Here, we investigated the putative neuroprotective effect of guanosine in an AD-like mouse model. Adult mice received a single intracerebroventricular injection of Aβ (400 pmol/site) or vehicle and then were treated immediately, 3 h later, and once a day during the subsequent 14 days with guanosine (8 mg/kg, intraperitoneally). Aβ or guanosine did not alter mouse locomotor activity and anxiety-related behaviors. Aβ-treated mice displayed short-term memory deficit in the object location task that was prevented by guanosine. Guanosine prevented the Aβ-induced increase in latency to grooming in the splash test, an indicative of anhedonia. Aβ increased Na-independent glutamate uptake in ex vivo hippocampal slices, and guanosine reversed it to control levels. The repeated administration of guanosine increased hippocampal GDP levels, which was not observed in the group treated with Aβ plus guanosine. Aβ induced an increase in hippocampal ADP levels. Aβ decreased GFAP expression in the hippocampal CA1 region, an effect not modified by guanosine. No differences were observed concerning synaptophysin and NeuN immunolabeling. Together, these results show that guanosine prevents memory deficit and anhedonic-like behavior induced by Aβ that seem to be linked to glutamate transport unbalance and alterations on purine and metabolite levels in mouse hippocampus.
Guanosine (GUO) has been shown to act as a neuroprotective agent against glutamatergic excitotoxicity by increasing glutamate uptake and decreasing its release. In this study, a putative effect of GUO action on glutamate transporters activity modulation was assessed in hippocampal slices subjected to oxygen and glucose deprivation (OGD), an in vitro model of brain ischemia. Slices subjected to OGD showed increased excitatory amino acids release (measured by D-[(3)H]aspartate release) that was prevented in the presence of GUO (100 µM). The glutamate transporter blockers, DL-TBOA (10 µM), DHK (100 µM, selective inhibitor of GLT-1), and sulfasalazine (SAS, 250 µM, Xc(-) system inhibitor) decreased OGD-induced D-aspartate release. Interestingly, DHK or DL-TBOA blocked the decrease in glutamate release induced by GUO, whereas SAS did not modify the GUO effect. GUO protected hippocampal slices from cellular damage by modulation of glutamate transporters, however selective blockade of GLT-1 or Xc- system only did not affect this protective action of GUO. OGD decreased hippocampal glutamine synthetase (GS) activity and GUO recovered GS activity to control levels without altering the kinetic parameters of GS activity, thus suggesting GUO does not directly interact with GS. Additionally, the pharmacological inhibition of GS activity with methionine sulfoximine abolished the effect of GUO in reducing D-aspartate release and cellular damage evoked by OGD. Altogether, results in hippocampal slices subjected to OGD show that GUO counteracts the release of excitatory amino acids, stimulates the activity of GS, and decreases the cellular damage by modulation of glutamate transporters activity.
BACKGROUND: Extrapulmonary TB (EPTB) comprises approximately 15–20% of TB cases worldwide, and its diagnosis is difficult. The sensitivity of Xpert® MTB/RIF (Xpert) in the diagnosis of EPTB is low on account of its paucibacillary nature. Xpert® MTB/RIF Ultra (Ultra) was developed to improve sensitivity.OBJECTIVE: To compare the sensitivity of Ultra test with that of Xpert against MGIT™ (Mycobacteria Growth Indicator Tube) culture and a composite reference standard (CRS).METHODS: We recruited consecutive treatment-naïve patients with suspected EPTB. Demographic information, clinical and relevant laboratory data were collected.RESULTS: From January 2019 to November 2019, 210 patients provided 250 samples. Against MGIT culture, the sensitivity of Ultra was significantly higher than Xpert (72% vs. 51.1%; P = 0.04), the specificity was lower (87.8% vs. 95.1%). Against the CRS also, the sensitivity of Ultra was significantly higher than Xpert (45.4% vs. 25.2%; P = 0.002); however, the specificities were similar (98.2% vs. 99.1%). The trend towards higher sensitivity of Ultra compared to Xpert was seen in most of the individual samples. The sensitivities against MGIT and CRS were as follows: lymph node (68.1% vs. 31.8%; P = 0.01) and (59.5% vs. 23.8%; P = 0.001), pleural biopsy (80.0% on both; P = NS) and (53.8% vs. 46.2%; P = NS) and pleural fluid (66.7% vs. 50%; P = NS) and (22.5% vs. 9.6%; P = NS), respectively.CONCLUSIONS: Xpert Ultra showed a significantly higher sensitivity in diagnosing EPTB than Xpert.
We report a retroviral positive patient who presented to us with recurrent skin lesions along with intermittent, colicky periumbilical abdominal pain associated with non-projectile, postprandial vomiting. Contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) of abdomen and pelvis was suggestive of proximal jejunal obstruction. Double balloon enteroscopy done which showed extensive deep ulceration with surrounding nodular surface and friable mucosa at 60 cm from pylorus with luminal narrowing. The biopsy from this region as well as the skin lesion on the forehead grew Talaromyces marneffei. She was initially treated with liposomal amphotericin B for 2 weeks following which she received itraconazole for 3 weeks for disseminated talaromycosis infection. She had already been started on antiretroviral therapy (ART) 1 year back however her cluster of differentiation 4 (CD4) counts did not show any improvement. Proximal bowel obstruction leading to poor nutritional status compounded with ineffective ART therapy due to suboptimal absorption, dictated the staged management of her condition. Feeding jejunostomy was done with a plan to offer her resection and anastomosis of affected jejunal segment, should she require one, after optimising her nutritional and immunological status.
Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a progressive neurodegenerative illness responsible for cognitive impairment and dementia. Accumulation of amyloid-beta (Aβ) peptides in neurons and synapses causes cell metabolism to unbalance, and the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), leading to neuronal death and cognitive damage. Guanosine is an endogenous nucleoside recognized as a neuroprotective agent since it prevents glutamate-induced neurotoxicity by a mechanism not yet completely elucidated. In this study, we evaluated behavioral and biochemical effects in the hippocampus caused by the intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) infusion of Aβ1-42 peptide (400 pmol/site) in mice, and the neuroprotective effect of guanosine (8 mg/kg, i.p.). An initial evaluation on the eighth day after Aβ1-42 infusion showed no changes in the tail suspension test, although ex vivo analyses in hippocampal slices showed increased ROS production. In the second protocol, on the tenth day following Aβ1-42 infusion, no effect was observed in the sucrose splash test, but a reduction in the recognition index in the object location test showed impaired spatial memory. Analysis of hippocampal slices showed no ROS production and mitochondrial membrane potential alteration, but a tendency to increase glutamate release and a significant lactate release, pointing to a metabolic alteration. Those effects were accompanied by decreased cell viability and increased membrane damage. Guanosine treatment prevented behavioral and biochemical alterations evoked by Aβ1-42, suggesting a potential role against behavioral and biochemical damage evoked by Aβ in the hippocampus.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.