Internet-delivered cognitive behaviour therapy (ICBT) is an efficacious, yet novel approach to the treatment of depression and anxiety. It has the potential to improve access to evidenced-based care, but only if potential patients are aware of, understand, and have positive expectations about this treatment. In order to establish whether the use of an educational video could improve favourable expectations of ICBT, two studies were conducted. The goal of the first study was to determine whether an educational video would improve perceptions of ICBT among individuals seeking ICBT treatment and to determine what type of information (client testimonials versus statistical information related to outcomes) facilitates the greatest increase in positive expectations of ICBT. Participants who visited an ICBT service (N = 71) website were invited to first complete brief questionnaires assessing initial perceptions of ICBT. They were then randomly assigned to watch one of two videos containing either client testimonials (n = 32) or statistical information related to outcomes (n = 39). Patient perceptions of ICBT were then reassessed. Perceptions of ICBT were significantly higher post-video than pre-video and the type of information did not impact perceptions of ICBT. In the second study, the research was extended by examining perceptions of ICBT before and after watching an educational video (including both statistical and narrative information as this had no impact on perceptions) in a sample of individuals (N = 94) who were experiencing anxiety and depression but were not specifically seeking ICBT. As with treatment seekers, perceptions of ICBT were significantly higher post-video than pre-video. Comparison of the treatment and non-treatment seekers revealed no differences in perceptions of ICBT between the samples. The findings suggest that educational videos are an effective way to increase expectations of ICBT. Future directions for research are described.
Introduction During public health crises like the COVID-19 pandemic, populations can experience worsening mental health. Prior reports have suggested that Black Americans experienced lower rates of anxiety and depression than White Americans before the pandemic; however, during the pandemic, outcomes may be different as Black Americans have been disproportionately affected in terms of mortality, hospitalization, COVID-19 infection, and job loss. We documented the differential mental health impact of COVID-19 on Black and Non-Black Americans. Methods We analyzed nationally representative longitudinal data from the Understanding America Study COVID-19 Tracking Survey spanning March through November of 2020 to assess differences over time in prevalence of anxiety and depression between Black and non-Black Americans. Results We found that Black Americans were significantly less likely to report symptoms for anxiety, depression, or both during the pandemic. In a given month between March through November of 2020, the odds of Black Americans reporting such symptoms was on average about half that of Non-Black Americans. We also found that in September 2020, the gap in reporting symptoms for depression began to widen gradually. Specifically, since that time, prevalence of depression remained stable among non-Black Americans while it declined gradually among Black Americans. Our main results were robust to adjusting for demographics, risk perceptions, and baseline pre-pandemic mental health status. Conclusions Black Americans maintained significantly better mental health than Non-Black Americans despite their struggle against economic, health, and racial inequalities during the pandemic. We discuss the significance and implications of our results and identify opportunities for future research.
Many Internet-delivered cognitive behavioural therapy (ICBT) programs include email communication between clients and therapists as a part of treatment; yet relatively little is known about the nature and impact of this communication. Previous research conducted by Svartvatten et al. (2015) has identified 10 themes in written correspondence by clients accessing ICBT for depression. The current study examined: (1) if previously identified themes in client emails would be present in a shorter ICBT program for depression and anxiety; and (2) whether themes in emails similarly correlated with symptom improvement, lesson completion, and perceptions of working alliance. Using 80 randomly selected clients from a published ICBT trial (ISRCTN42729166; Hadjistavropoulos et al., 2016), client emails (average 5.69 per client) were examined for the presence of the themes reported by Svartvatten et al. (2015) and correlated with symptom improvement, lesson completion, perceptions of working alliance. Although most themes developed by Svartvatten et al. (2015) were identified in client emails, the frequency of themes differed between studies. Most notably, emails in the current study were more often coded as involving alliance bolstering (~39% vs. 22% of statements) and identification of patterns and problem behaviours (~25% vs. 6% of statements). Greater frequency of tries alternative behaviour and identifies patterns and problem behaviours were correlated with a greater number of lessons completed. In terms of symptom change, greater frequency of maladaptive repetitive thinking and problems with treatment content in the emails were correlated with smaller improvements in anxiety, whereas observes positive consequences was correlated with larger improvements in anxiety. Similarly, greater frequency of maladaptive repetitive thinking was correlated with smaller improvements in depression. Regarding perceptions of working alliance, more frequent statements of observes positive consequences was correlated with higher alliance. The research provides clinicians and researchers with an improved understanding of the comparability and meaning of client communication in different ICBT programs. Experimental research is needed to better understand the role of client communication in ICBT.
Background Humanitarian crises and armed conflicts lead to a greater prevalence of poor population mental health. Following the 1 February 2021 military coup in Burma, the country's civilians have faced humanitarian crises that have probably caused rising rates of mental disorders. However, a dearth of data has prevented researchers from assessing the extent of the problem empirically. Aims To better understand prevalence of depressive and anxiety disorders among the Burmese adult population after the February 2021 military coup. Method We fielded an online non-probability survey of 7720 Burmese adults aged 18 and older during October 2021 and asked mental health and demographic questions. We used the Patient Health Questionnaire-4 to measure probable depression and anxiety in respondents. We also estimated logistic regressions to assess variations in probable depression and anxiety across demographic subgroups and by level of trust in various media sources, including those operated by the Burmese military establishment. Results We found consistently high rates of probable anxiety and depression combined (60.71%), probable depression (61%) and probable anxiety (58%) in the sample overall, as well as across demographic subgroups. Respondents who ‘mostly’ or ‘completely’ trusted military-affiliated media sources (about 3% of the sample) were significantly less likely than respondents who did not trust these sources to report symptoms of anxiety and depression (AOR = 0.574; 95% CI 0.370–0.889), depression (AOR = 0.590; 95% CI 0.383–0.908) or anxiety (AOR = 0.609; 95% CI 0.390–0.951). Conclusions The widespread symptoms of anxiety and depression we observed demonstrate the need for both continuous surveillance of the current situation and humanitarian interventions to address mental health needs in Burma.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.