Background: Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) can be cured by pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA). It is considered the best and only curable treatment option for patients with accessible lesions evaluated as optimal candidates. We describe the experience of the two reference centers in Spain, in order to reinforce the need for referring CTEPH patients to a specialized center to be assessed by a Multidisciplinary Expert Team. Methods: We included a population of 338 patients who met the definition for CTEPH and underwent PEA between January 2007 and December 2019. The surgery was indicated in almost 60% of patients assessed. Demographic, anthropometric, hemodynamic and echocardiographic features are listed for PEA patients. Immediate and one-year postoperative outcomes as well as overall mortality were analyzed. Results: Mean age was 53.5±15.0 years, 53.8% were men; a total of 68.5% were in WHO functional class III-IV; and most of them were in a severe preoperative hemodynamic condition: mean pulmonary arterial pressure (mPAP) was 46.5±13.1 mmHg and mean pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) was 764.5± 392.8 dyn•s•cm −5 . PEA surgery was performed with cardiopulmonary bypass (CBP) and circulatory arrest, with very few complications [including neurological, postoperative reperfusion edema, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) implant and cardiac failure] and optimal postoperative results, where exercise capacity increased and mPAP and PVR values decreased significantly. Presence of persistent pulmonary hypertension (PH) at the six-month right heart catheterization was evaluated. A 3.3% perioperative mortality was achieved. Overall, one-, three-and five-year survival rates were analyzed by Kaplan-Meier's method (94.8%, 93.3% and 90.5% respectively), as well as for residual PH patients. Mortality risk factors were assessed.Conclusions: Outstanding PEA results were seen in the immediate, one-year and long-term outcomes.The incidence of complications, including in-hospital mortality and long-term mortality were also below European rates.
Background
Although pre-surgical nasal decontamination with mupirocin (NDM) has been advocated as a measure for preventing post-surgical mediastinitis (PSM) due to Staphylococcus aureus, this strategy is not universally recommended due to the lack of robust supporting evidence. We aimed to evaluate the role of pre-operative NDM in the annual incidence of S. aureus PSM at our institution.
Methods
An interrupted time-series analysis, with autoregressive error model, was applied to our single-center cohort by comparing pre-intervention (1990-2003) and post-intervention period (2005 to 2018). Logistic regression was performed to analyze risk factors for S. aureus PSM.
Findings
12,236 sternotomy procedures were analyzed (6,370 [52.1%] and 5,866 [47.9%] in the pre-intervention and post-intervention periods, respectively). The mean annual percentage adherence to NDM estimated over the post-interventional period was 90.2%. Only four out of 127 total cases of S. aureus PSM occurred during the 14-years post-intervention period (0.68/1,000 sternotomies vs. 19.31/1,000 in pre-interventional period [p<0.0001]). Interrupted time-series analysis demonstrated a statistically significant annual reduction of S. aureus PSM trend of –9.85 cases per 1,000 sternotomies (-13.17 to -6.5, P-value< 0·0001) in 2005, with a decreasing trend maintained over the following five years with an estimated relative reduction of 84.8% (95% CI: 89·25 to 74·09). Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease was the single independent risk factor for S. aureus PSM (odds ratio: 3.7; 95% CI: 1.72-7.93) and was equally distributed in patients undergoing sternotomy during pre or post-intervention periods.
Interpretation
Our experience suggests that the implementation of pre-operative NDM reduces significantly the incidence of S. aureus PSM.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.