Objective: To assess the validity and reliability of the most recent adaptation of Block's full-diet food-frequency questionnaire (FFQ) among a sample of Canadian women. Design: Participants completed a self-administered FFQ (FFQ1), two unannounced 24-hour recalls (weekday and weekend) and a second FFQ (FFQ2) between October 2003 and February 2004. FFQs and recalls were analysed for 32 nutrients using Block Dietary Data Systems and the University of Minnesota's Nutrient Data System. Mean and median intakes were computed, along with crude and deattenuated Pearson correlation coefficients between FFQ1 and the average of two recalls (validity) and between FFQ1 and FFQ2 (reliability). Setting: Ontario, Canada. Subjects: A random population-based sample (n ¼ 166) of women aged 25 to 74 years. Results: One hundred and fifteen (69%) women completed FFQ1, 96 completed FFQ1 and both recalls, and 93 completed both FFQs, about 56 days apart. Mean intakes were similar for most nutrients. FFQ reliability was high, with Pearson correlation coefficients having a median of 0.75, ranging from 0.57 to 0.90 (macronutrients) and from 0.65 to 0.88 (micronutrients from supplements and food). FFQ validity was moderate to high, with deattenuated Pearson correlation coefficients having a median of 0.59, ranging from 0.11 to 0.73 (macronutrients) and from 0.50 to 0.76 (micronutrients from supplements and food). Our micronutrient correlations were similar to or higher than those of other studies that included supplements. Two correlations , 0.40 were associated with fats. Conclusions: The validity and reliability of this full-diet version of the Block FFQ were moderate to high, supporting its use in future studies among Canadian women. Food-frequency questionnaires (FFQs) provide the most practical and economical method for collecting data on 'usual' dietary intake in population-based epidemiological studies. In aetiological research, it is preferable to use FFQs that query the whole diet rather than a limited number of foods for specific hypotheses, since comprehensiveness will improve the ability to adjust for confounding nutrients and energy intake, when appropriate, and to explore future dietary hypotheses 1 -3 . Many comprehensive FFQs have been developed for epidemiological research and, among these, the Block FFQ is one of the most widely used 2,4 -6 . Originally developed at the US National Cancer Institute in 1984 1,5,7 , it has undergone a number of revisions to reflect changes in consumption and improvements in FFQ design 4,5,7 -9 . Although a new FFQ is in development (Torin Block, personal communication), the most recent full-diet