No abstract

SUMMARY BackgroundGastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) patients on proton pump inhibitors before breakfast or dinner have acid recovery at night. Bedtime immediate-release omeprazole (IR-OME) demonstrated better control of nocturnal pH than pantoprazole before dinner.

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) effectively block gastric acid secretion and are the treatment of choice for heartburn. PPIs differ, however, in onset of action and bioavailability. In this single‐center, open‐label, three‐way crossover study, onset of action of immediate‐release omeprazole 20 mg/sodium bicarbonate 1100 mg (IR‐OME) and delayed‐release (DR) lansoprazole 15 mg was evaluated in 63 healthy fasting adults. Subjects were randomized to once daily IR‐OME, or DR‐lansoprazole, or no treatment for 7 days. The primary efficacy endpoint was the earliest time where a statistically significant difference was observed between IR‐OME and DR‐lansoprazole in median intragastric pH scores for three consecutive 5‐min intervals on day 7. Secondary endpoints compared effects of active treatments on days 1 and 7 (e.g., time to sustained inhibition, percentage of time with pH >4). A significant difference in median intragastric pH favoring IR‐OME was observed on day 7 starting at the 10‐ to 15‐min interval postdosing (P = 0.024) and sustaining through the 115‐ to 120‐min interval (P = 0.017). On day 1, IR‐OME achieved sustained inhibition of intragastric acidity significantly faster than DR‐lansoprazole. IR‐OME maintained pH >4 significantly longer than DR‐lansoprazole over a 24‐h period (P = 0.007) on day 7. Overall, results of this study demonstrate IR‐OME is safe and well tolerated and that treatment with IR‐OME results in significantly faster onset of action and better gastric acid suppression at steady state than DR‐lansoprazole.

VECAM 40 and VECAM 20 were significantly better in maintaining intragastric pH > 4 during the nighttime than OMP 20 mg. Succinic acid eliminates the need for a subsequent meal for intragastric pH control by VECAM.

SUMMARY AimTo demonstrate the pharmacodynamic comparability between oral 40 mg pantoprazole delayed-release granules and tablets. MethodsThis was a multicentre, randomized, open-label, 2-period, 2-sequence, 9-week crossover study in patients aged 18-65 years with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and documented erosive oesophagitis. The primary endpoint was a comparison of the inhibition of pentagastrin-stimulated maximum acid output (MAO) at steady state after once daily dosing for 1 week and 23 h after the last dose of pantoprazole granules and tablets. Basal acid output was measured prior to MAO. Standard safety evaluations were performed. The one-sided t-test was used to test the null hypothesis that granules -1.2 · tablet ‡ 0 against the alternative hypothesis that this difference was <0 for both MAO and basal acid output values. ResultsSixty patients completed the study. The mean MAO values were 7.11 AE 4.98 and 7.29 AE 4.77 mmol ⁄ h, while the mean basal acid output values were 0.74 AE 0.91 and 0.58 AE 0.63 mmol ⁄ h for the granules and tablets, respectively. The two formulations were shown statistically to be pharmacodynamically equivalent in suppressing MAO (P = 0.006), safe and well tolerated. ConclusionPatients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease who are unable to swallow the tablet may safely be prescribed the pantoprazole sodium granules.