No abstract

Introduction: COVID-19 vaccines became available after being carefully monitored in clinical trials with safety and efficacy on the human body. However, a few recipients developed unusual side effects, including cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST). We aim to systematically review the baseline features, clinical characteristics, treatment, and outcomes in patients developing CVST post-COVID-19 vaccination. Methods: This study was conducted according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis) 2020 guideline. Investigators independently searched PubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar for English language articles published from inception up until September 10, 2021, reporting the incidence of CVST post-COVID-19 vaccines. We analyzed CVST patients’ baseline data, type of vaccines, clinical findings, treatment, and outcomes. Our systematic review process yielded patient-level data. Result: The final analysis included 25 studies that identified 80 patients who developed CVST after the COVID-19 vaccination. Of the 80 CVST cases, 31 (39.24%) patients died. There was no significant relationship between mortality and age ( P = .733), sex ( P = .095), vaccine type ( P = .798), platelet count ( P = .93), and comorbidities such as hypertension ( P = .734) and diabetes mellitus ( P = .758). However, mortality was associated with the duration of onset of CVST symptoms after vaccination ( P = .022). Patients with CVST post-COVID-19 vaccination were more likely to survive if treated with an anticoagulant ( P = .039). Patients who developed intracranial hemorrhage ( P = .012) or thrombosis in the cortical vein ( P = .021) were more likely to die. Conclusion: COVID-19 vaccine-associated CVST is associated with high mortality rate. Timely diagnosis and management can be lifesaving for patients.

Various studies have suggested the possible cardiovascular (CV) protective effects of the pneumococcal vaccine (PV). Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis to assess the association between recipients of PV with mortality and CV outcomes among patients with and without established cardiovascular disease. We performed a systematic literature search in PubMed, Embase, and Scopus for studies evaluating the effect of PV on mortality and CV outcomes. A total of 15 studies with 347,444 patients were included in the meta-analysis: 111,784 patients received PV (32%) and 235,660 patients were in the unvaccinated group (68%). Recipients of PV were associated with decreased all-cause mortality (HR, 0.76 (95% CI: 0.66 to 0.87), p < 0.001). PV was associated with a decrease in the incidence of myocardial infarction (MI) (HR, 0.73 (95% CI: 0.56–0.96), p = 0.02), without significant reduction in CV mortality (HR, 0.87 (95% CI: 0.72–1.07), p = 0.18) and stroke (HR, 1.01 (95% CI: 0.93–1.10), p = 0.82). Our study found PV was associated with decreased risk of all-cause mortality and MI. Future RCTs will be necessary to confirm benefits associated with receipt of PV.

Background The clinical impact of the influenza vaccination on cardiovascular outcomes in people with established cardiovascular disease (CVD) is still debated. Aim The aim of this meta-analysis was to estimate the effect of influenza vaccination on cardiovascular and cerebrovascular outcomes among patients with established CVD. Methods We systematically searched all electronic databases from inception until 15 April 2022. Primary clinical outcomes were all-cause mortality (ACM), and major adverse clinical events (MACE). Secondary endpoints were heart failure, myocardial infarction, CV mortality, and stroke. Results Eighteen articles (five randomized trials and thirteen observational studies), with a total of 22,532,165 patients were included in the analysis. There were 217,072 participants included in the high cardiovascular risk or established CVD population (vaccinated n = 111,073 and unvaccinated n = 105,999). The mean age of the patients was 68 years old, without any difference between groups (69 vs 71) years. At mean follow-up of 1.5 years, vaccinated group was associated with lower risk for all-cause mortality [HR, 0.71(95%CI, 0.63-0.80), p &lt; 0.001], MACE [HR, 0.83(95%CI:0.72-0.96), p = 0.01], CV mortality [HR, 0.78(95%CI:0.68-0.90), p &lt; 0.001] and myocardial infarction [HR, 0.82(95%CI:0.74-0.92), p &lt; 0.001] compared to unvaccinated group. While incidence of stroke [HR, 1.03 (95%CI, 0.92-1.06), p = 0.61] and heart failure [HR, 0.74 (95%CI, 0.51-1.08), p = 0.12] did not differ between the two groups. Conclusion Influenza vaccination reduced major adverse clinical events, all-cause mortality, CV mortality and myocardial infarction. These highlighted the importance of influenza vaccination in established CVD or high cardiovascular risk.

Background The recent outbreak of Human Monkeypox (MPXV) in nonendemic regions of the world is of great concern. Objective We aimed to systematically analyze the current epidemiology, clinical presentation, and outcomes of the Monkeypox virus. Method Systematic literature was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Google Scholar, and Scopus using predefined MESH terms by using “AND” and “OR.” The following search terms were used: Monkeypox [MeSH] OR “Monkeypox virus” [MeSH] OR “POX” OR “Monkeypox” AND “Outbreak” AND “Outcomes” from December 2019 till 14th June 2022 without restrictions of language. Results A total of 1074 (99.90%) patients tested positive for Monkeypox virus through RT‐PCR while 1 (0.09) patient was suspected. There was a gender difference with male predominance (54.23% vs. 45.48%) compared with female patients. Mean age (±SD) of patients was 20.66 ± 16.45 years. The major symptoms were rash (100%), fever (96%), and other important symptoms were upper respiratory symptoms (97%), headache (95%), vomiting (95%), oral ulcers (96%), conjunctivitis (96%) and lymphadenopathy (85%). The average mean duration of treatment was 5 days, while the mean hospitalization duration was 13.3 ± 6.37 days. The outcome of 20 patients was available, 19 of 20 patients recovered fully from monkeypox, however, 1 patient was not able to survive resulting in death. Conclusion The recent monkeypox virus outbreak has shown that the virus could transmit in ways that were not previously expected. Further research is needed to understand the possible outcomes and association with humans and their different organ systems.