SummaryReproducibility in molecular and cellular studies is fundamental to scientific discovery. To establish the reproducibility of a well-defined long-term neuronal differentiation protocol, we repeated the cellular and molecular comparison of the same two iPSC lines across five distinct laboratories. Despite uncovering acceptable variability within individual laboratories, we detect poor cross-site reproducibility of the differential gene expression signature between these two lines. Factor analysis identifies the laboratory as the largest source of variation along with several variation-inflating confounders such as passaging effects and progenitor storage. Single-cell transcriptomics shows substantial cellular heterogeneity underlying inter-laboratory variability and being responsible for biases in differential gene expression inference. Factor analysis-based normalization of the combined dataset can remove the nuisance technical effects, enabling the execution of robust hypothesis-generating studies. Our study shows that multi-center collaborations can expose systematic biases and identify critical factors to be standardized when publishing novel protocols, contributing to increased cross-site reproducibility.
The role of naturally occurring D in living organisms has been examined by using deuterium-depleted water (30-40 ppm D) instead of water containing the natural abundance of D (150 ppm). The deuterium-depleted water significantly decreased the growth rate of the L929 fibroblast cell line, and also inhibited the tumor growth in xenotransplanted mice. Eighty days after transplantation in 10 (59%) out of 17 tumorous mice the tumor, after having grown, regressed and then disappeared. We suggest that the naturally occurring D has a central role in signal transduction involved in cell cycle regulation.
In the last five years there has been a rapid explosion of publications reporting that neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs) play a role in neurodegenerative disorders. Furthermore, there is a well-established loss of nAChRs in post-mortem brains from patients with Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease and a range of other disorders. In the present review we discuss the evidence that nicotine and subtype selective nAChR ligands can provide neuroprotection in in vitro cell culture systems and in in vivo studies in animal models of such disorders. Whilst in vitro data pertaining to a protective effect of nicotine against nigral neurotoxins like MPTP is less robust, most studies agree that nicotine is protective against glutamate and beta-amyloid toxicity in various culture systems. This effect appears to be mediated by alpha7 subtype nAChRs since the protection is blocked by alpha-bungarotoxin and is mimicked by alpha7 selective agonists. In vivo studies indicate that alpha7 receptors play a critical role in protection from cholinergic lesions and enhancing cognitive function. The exact subtype involved in the neuroprotectant effects seen in animal models of Parkinson's disease is not clear, but in general broad spectrum nAChR agonists appear to provide protection, while alpha4beta2 receptors appear to mediate symptomatic improvements. Evidence favouring a protectant effect of nicotine against acute degenerative conditions is less strong, though some protection has been observed with nicotine pre-treatment in global ischaemia models. A variety of cellular mechanisms ranging from the production of growth factors through to inactivation of toxins and antioxidant actions of nicotine have been proposed to underlie the nAChR-mediated neuroprotection in vitro and in vivo. In summary, although the lack of subtype selective ligands has hampered progress, it is clear that in the future neuronal nAChR agonists could provide functional improvements and slow or halt the progress of several crippling degenerative diseases.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.