Abstract:1. Pollination is an important ecosystem service as many agricultural crops such as fruit trees are pollinated by insects. Agricultural intensification, however, is one of the main drivers resulting in a serious decline of pollinator populations worldwide. 2. In this study pollinator communities were examined in twelve apple orchards surrounded by either homogeneous or heterogeneous landscape in Hungary. Pollinators (honey bees, wild bees, hoverflies) were surveyed in the flowering period of apple trees. Landscape heterogeneity was characterized in circles of 300, 500 and 1000 m radius around each orchard using Shannon's diversity and Shannon's evenness indices. 3. We found that pollination success of apple was significantly related to the species richness of wild bees, regardless the dominance of honey bees. 4. Diversity of the surrounding landscape matrix had a marginal positive effect on the species richness of hoverflies at 300m, positive effect on the species richness of wild bees at 500m radius circle, while evenness of the surrounding landscape enhanced the abundance of wild bees at 500m radius circle. Flower resources in the groundcover within the orchards supported honey bees. 5. Therefore maintenance of semi-natural habitats within 500m around apple orchards is highly recommended to enhance wild pollinator communities and apple production. Apple is one of the most important insect pollinated crops in the European Union, accounting 51 for 16% of the EU's total economic gains attributed to insect (particularly bee) pollination 52 (Leonhardt et al., 2013). Most apple varieties are cross-pollinated and insect pollination not 53 only affects the quantity of apple production, but can also have marked impacts on the quality 54 of the fruits, influencing size, shape and their market price (Garratt et al., 2014a). The most 55 common insect pollinator of apple is the honey bee (Apis mellifera); however, it is not the bees (Bosch & Blas, 1994). Hoverflies (Syrphidae) have also been observed with pollen loads 63 containing a high proportion of compatible fruit pollen (Kendall, 1973). Agricultural and Forest Entomology 64In the temperate zone, pollinator insects are under threat from a number of limiting 65 factors, such as climate change (Rader et al., 2013), human disturbance (Goulson et al., 66 2008), agricultural intensification (Kearns et al., 1998; Steffan-Dewenter et al., 2005; 67 Fitzpatrick et al., 2006; Memmott et al., 2007), and landscape fragmentation (Aizen & 68 Feisinger, 2003; Diekötter & Crist, 2013), which leads to less effective pollination and 69 reduces agricultural production (Floyd, 1992; Garibaldi et al., 2011a Garibaldi et al., , 2013 (Kremen et al., 2002; Brittain et al., 2013). Maintaining diverse communities, 94Apple is the most important fruit tree in Hungary, as it provides 60 % of the total 95Hungarian fruit production, and currently amounts to 400-600 thousand tons annually on We constructed generalized linear mixed models (GLMM) for each response variab...

Multiple applications of hydrophobic kaolin particle film in apple orchards suppressed numbers of blossom weevil (Anthonomus pomorum), brown leaf weevil (Phyllobius oblongus), attelabid weevil (Caenorhinus pauxillus), leafhoppers (Empoasca vitis and Zygina flammigera) and green apple aphid (Aphis pomi) colonies. The kaolin treatments reduced the apple sawfly (Hoplocampa testudinea) fruit infestation on cultivar J. Grieve, and the fruit damage caused by oyster scale (Quadraspidiotus ostreaeformis), mussel scale (Lepidosaphes ulmi), early caterpillars, leaf rolling moths (Tortricidae), fruitlet‐mining tortrix moth (Pammene rhediella) and codling moth (Cydia pomonella). There was no effect on the number of colonies of rosy leaf curling aphid (Dysaphis devecta), nor on the fruit damage caused by common earwig (Forficula auricularia) and apple sawfly on cv. G. Delicious. The level of infestation of rosy apple aphid (Dysaphis plantaginea), leaf miner moths (Phyllonorycter blancardella, Lyonetia clerkella), and agromyzid flies (Phytomyza heringiana) increased in the kaolin‐treated plots. Kaolin treatments promoted woolly apple aphid (Eriosoma lanigerum) infestation, which became severe, while it reduced the abundance of polyphagous predators like F. auricularia, predaceous Heteroptera and Coleoptera, the red velvet mite (Allothrombium fuliginosum), spiders (Araneae) and the abundance of common black ant (Lasius niger). The treatments also reduced parasitism of the apple sawfly by the ichneumonid Lathrolestes ensator. Many weeks after ending the kaolin treatments, the number of predaceous Coleoptera and especially the number of spiders remained low in the kaolin‐treated plots.

Abstract. Apple is grown as a long-term perennial crop and orchards provide relatively stable ecological habitats. Only a small proportion of the diverse fauna of arthropods that can inhabit the orchard ecosystem are important pests, the majority of species being minor pests, beneficial or benign. In this paper, the interacting ecosystem services provided by five contrasting naturally occurring arthropod groups in cool temperate apple orchards are reviewed, and their economic benefits broadly quantified. These are:• The roles of bees and other insects in apple pollination increasing yields and fruit quality, the economic value of which may be significantly underestimated.• Naturally occurring, pesticide-resistant phytoseiid predatory mites and their role in regulating phytophagous mites. They eliminate the need for 1-2 acaricide sprays per annum and the risk of acaricide resistance.• The earwig Forficula auricularia L. and its role in regulating several important apple pests. There is great variability in populations between orchards for reasons not fully understood. It is estimated that F. auricularia reduces insecticide applications by 2-3 per annum and reduces pest damage.• Mutualism between the common black ant Lasius niger (L.) and important pest aphids, the roles of competitors, natural and artificial food sources, and ant exclusion in disrupting mutualism which can foster biocontrol of aphids by generalist predators so greatly reducing the need for sprays.• Beneficial epigeic arthropods and their role in predating the soil dwelling life stages of insect pests. These contribute to the control of pest populations although the level of suppression is not consistent depending on several ecological factors.

No abstract

Spiders (Araneae) form abundant and diverse assemblages in agroecosystems such as fruit orchards, and thus might have an important role as natural enemies of orchard pests. Although spiders are polyphagous and opportunistic predators in general, limited information exists on their natural prey at both species and community levels. Thus, the aim of this study was to assess the natural prey (realized trophic niche) of arboreal hunting spiders, their role in trophic webs and their biological control potential with direct observation of predation events in apple orchards. Hunting spiders with prey in their chelicerae were collected in the canopy of apple trees in organic apple orchards in Hungary during the growing seasons between 2013 and 2019 and both spiders and their prey were identified and measured. Among others, the composition of the actual (captured by spiders) and the potential (available in the canopy) prey was compared, trophic niche and food web metrics were calculated, and some morphological, dimensional data of the spider-prey pairs were analyzed. Species-specific differences in prey composition or pest control ability were also discussed. By analyzing a total of 878 prey items captured by spiders, we concluded that arboreal hunting spiders forage selectively and consume a large number of apple pests; however, spiders’ beneficial effects are greatly reduced by their high levels of intraguild predation and by a propensity to switch from pests to alternative prey. In this study, arboreal hunting spiders showed negative selectivity for pests, no selectivity for natural enemies and positive selectivity for neutral species. In the trophic web, the dominant hunting spider taxa/groups (Carrhotus xanthogramma, Philodromus cespitum, Clubiona spp., Ebrechtella tricuspidata, Xysticus spp. and ‘Other salticids’) exhibit different levels of predation on different prey groups and the trophic web’s structure changes depending on the time of year. Hunting spiders show a high functional redundancy in their predation, but contrary to their polyphagous nature, the examined spider taxa showed differences in their natural diet, exhibited a certain degree of prey specialization and selected prey by size and taxonomic identity. Guilds (such as stalkers, ambushers and foliage runners) did not consistently predict either prey composition or predation selectivity of arboreal hunting spider species. From the economic standpoint, Ph. cespitum and Clubiona spp. were found to be the most effective natural enemies of apple pests, especially of aphids. Finally, the trophic niche width of C. xanthogramma and Ph. cespitum increased during ontogeny, resulting in a shift in their predation. These results demonstrate how specific generalist predators can differ from each other in aspects of their predation ecology even within a relatively narrow taxonomic group.