Biostimulant - splenivit helps to increase the natural resistance of the body of young farm animals and reduce morbidity. To study splenivitis, groups of sows (60 heads each) were formed. The animals of the first experimental group were injected with tissue antigen, twice 20 and 10 days before farrowing, in doses of 3 and 5 ml. The animals of the second experimental group, simultaneously with tissue antigen, were injected with splenivit at a dose of 5 ml, three times, with an interval of 10 days. And also, to 122 fattening piglets - weaners: the 1st experimental group (31 piglets) was injected with splenivit intramuscularly 1 ml 3 times with an interval of 7-10 days. The 2nd group of pigs (29 heads) was injected with a non-specific gamma globulin according to the same scheme; in the 3rd group of pigs (62 heads) the above preparations were not used. Clinical observation of all piglets was carried out for 1.5 months, starting from the day of the formation of groups for fattening. For prophylactic purposes, newborn calves with gastroenteritis in the experimental group (13 heads) were injected subcutaneously with a biostimulator - splenivit, 1.0-1.5 ml, from 2-3 days of age, three times, with an interval of 7 days, in the control (7 heads) this drug did not apply. Also, the effectiveness of the stimulant - splenivit was studied on fattening calves. Experimental group (206 heads), control group (104 heads). Splenivit for the prevention of gastrointestinal diseases in animals, increases the natural resistance of the body, helps to reduce the incidence of young animals, improving growth and development and ensuring their maximum safety. To increase immunological protection, prevent gastrointestinal diseases, safety and productivity of animals, it is advisable and effective to use a biostimulator - splenivit.

Ðåçþìå. Áîëåçíè ìîëîäíÿêà ñåëüñêîõîçÿéñòâåííûõ aeèâîòíûõ íàíîñÿò çíà÷èòåëüíûé ýêîíîìè÷åñêèé óùåðá aeèâîòíîâîäñòâó íàøåé ñòðàíû, êîòîðûé ñêëàäûâàåòñÿ èç ïîòåðü ìîëîäíÿêà, ñíèaeåíèÿ ïðèâåñîâ, çíà÷èòåëüíûõ çàòðàò íà ëå÷åáíûå è ïðîôèëàêòè÷åñêèå ìåðîïðèÿòèÿ. AEåëó-äî÷íî-êèøå÷íûå áîëåçíè òåëÿò ðåãèñòðèðóþòñÿ âî âñåõ õîçÿéñòâàõ Âîëîãîäñêîé îáëàñòè. Çàáîëåâàåìîñòü òåëÿò â ñðåäíåì ñîñòàâëÿåò 45,5 % îò ðîäèâøåãîñÿ ìîëîäíÿêà êðóïíîãî ðîãàòîãî ñêîòà, à ëåòàëüíîñòü-5,6 %.  îñíîâíîì ïàäåae íàáëþäàåòñÿ ñðåäè íîâîðîaeäåííûõ aeèâîòíûõ. Èç ïàòîëîãè÷åñêîãî ìàòåðèàëà, âçÿòîãî îò òåëÿò, âûäåëåíèå áàêòåðèé ôèêñèðîâàëè â 136,0 %.  ìîíîâàðèàíòå âûäåëåííûå áàêòåðèè âñòðå÷àëèñü â 59,1 % ñëó÷àåâ, à â àññîöèàöèè ñ äðóãèìè ìèêðîîðãàíèçìàìè-â 40,9 % ñëó÷àåâ. Âèäîâîé ñîñòàâ àññîöèàöèé áûë äîñòàòî÷íî ðàçíîîáðàçåí è ïðåäñòàâëåí ñëåäóþùèìè êîìáèíàöèÿìè ìèêðîîðãàíèçìîâ: â àññîöèàöèÿõ ÷àùå âñåãî âûäåëÿëèñü Ãðàì+ ïàëî÷êè (69,8 %), Pasteurella è Ãðàì+ ïàëî÷êè (16,3 %), Ãðàì+ ïàëî÷êè è Streptococcus (9,3 %), Pasteurella è Streptococcus (4,7 %). Âñå âîçáóäèòåëè âèðóñíûõ àíòèãåíîâ áûëè âûäåëåíû â àññîöèàöèÿõ: êîðîíàâèðóñ è âèðóñíàÿ äèàðåÿ (43,0 %), êîðîíàâèðóñ è ðîòàâèðóñ (36,0 %), êîðîíàâèðóñ, ðîòàâèðóñ è âèðóñíàÿ äèàðåÿ (21,0 %). Âîçáóäèòåëè ðîòàâèðóñíîãî ýíòåðèòà è âèðóñíîé äèàðåè áûëè âûÿâëåíû êàê íà íåáîëüøèõ ôåðìàõ, òàê è íà êîìïëåêñàõ. Ñàìûé âûñîêèé ïðîöåíò âûäåëåíèÿ áûë ó êîðîíàâèðóñà-50,0 % ïðîá, ðîòàâèðóñà-21,0 %, à âîçáóäèòåëü âèðóñíîé äèàðåè-29,0 % ïðîá. Ãåíîì ãåðïåñâèðóñà ïÿòîãî òèïà âûÿâëåí â 37,0 % ïðîá ìåòîäîì ÏÖÐ. Summary. Diseases of young farm animals cause significant economic damage to livestock of our country, which consists of the loss of young animals, reducing weight gain, significant costs for medical and preventive measures. Gastrointestinal diseases of calves are registered in all farms of the Vologda oblast. The incidence of calves is on average 45,5% of the born young cattle, and mortality-5,6%. In General, mortality is observed among newborn animals. From the pathological material

No abstract

На материале анализа 120 медицинских карт больных туберкулезом легких, выполненного в соответствие с федеральными стандартами, установлено, что из 36 диагностических критериев, большинство либо используются редко, либо не используются совсем. Наряду с тем, следует учесть, что ряд из них имеют общий характер и не всегда влияют на качество диагностики. Нами было принято решение, считать достаточным минимальный набор диагностических критериев, однако при проведении соответствующей судебно-медицинской экспертизы, необходимо запрашивать через следователя объяснение лечащего врача, ответственного за поставку диагноза «туберкулез легких».

SUMMARY: In this article, Stephen Howe examines the series of approaches, topics of investigation, and methodologies that are loosely connected under the rubric of “new imperial history.” He stresses that to some, it means primarily cultural, as opposed to political or economic, histories of empire. Others use the term mainly to refer to ecological history. Still others mean primarily histories informed by feminism and gender studies, or by literary theories of colonial discourse and postcoloniality. Howe composes a “map” of the “new imperial history” by critically examining these approaches and the contradictions between them, along with what is not included as “new imperial history” by those who use the label. He shows that what intends, or proclaims itself, to be an integrative, barrier-dissolving body of work has instead sometimes seemed to produce new schisms and antagonisms. As Howe’s analysis shows, the idea of the new imperial history has already occasioned a remarkable number of negative polemics – often extremely heated ones, with strong political and/or ethical overtones. In the main part of the article Howe sketches the basic lines of these debates. They include methodological and epistemological disputes, inter- and intradisciplinary ones (especially those between “traditional” historians and social scientists on the one hand, colonial and postcolonial cultural theorists on the other), and directly political ones.