Background and study aims Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy (EUS-GE) with a lumen-apposing metal stent (LAMS) is a novel, minimally invasive technique in the palliative treatment of malignant gastric outlet obstruction (GOO). Several studies have demonstrated feasibility and safety of EUS-GE, but evidence on long-term durability is limited. The aim of this study was to evaluate patency of EUS-GE in treatment of malignant GOO.
Patients and Methods An international multicenter study was performed in seven centers in four European countries. Patients who underwent EUS-GE with a LAMS between March 2015 and March 2019 for palliative treatment of symptomatic malignant GOO were included retrospectively. Our main outcome was recurrent obstruction due to LAMS dysfunction; other outcomes of interest were technical success, clinical success, adverse events (AEs), and survival.
Results A total of 45 patients (mean age 69.9 ± 12.3 years and 48.9 % male) were included. Median duration of follow-up was 59 days (interquartile range [IQR] 41–128). Recurrent obstruction occurred in two patients (6.1 %), after 33 and 283 days of follow-up. Technical success was achieved in 39 patients (86.7 %). Clinical success was achieved in 33 patients (73.3 %). AEs occurred in 12 patients (26.7 %), of which five were fatal. Median overall survival was 57 days (IQR 32–114).
Conclusions EUS-GE showed a low rate of recurrent obstruction. The relatively high number of fatal AEs underscores the importance of careful implementation of EUS-GE in clinical practice.
Background: Familial-adenomatous-polyposis (FAP) is a rare inherited cancer predisposition syndrome. The treatment for FAP-related ampullary lesions (AL) is challenging and the role of endoscopic papillectomy (EP) is not elucidated yet. Data of FAP associated AL are limited and showed, at least in part, inconclusive results. We retrospectively analyzed the outcomes of EP in matched cohorts of FAP-related and sporadic ampullary lesions (SAL).
Methods: The ESAP study included 1422 EPs. A propensity-score matching (nearest-neighbor-method) including age, gender, comorbidity, histologic subtype and size was performed. Main outcomes were complete resection (R0), technical success, complications and recurrence.
Results: Propensity-score-based matching identified 202 patients (101 FAP, 101 SAL) with comparable baseline characteristics. FAP-patients were mainly asymptomatic (79.2% [95%CI 71.2-87.3] vs. 46.5% [95%CI 36.6-56.4]), p<0.001). The initial R0-rate was significantly lower in FAP-patients (63.4% [95%CI 53.8-72.9] vs. 83.2% [95%CI 75.8-90.6], p=0.001). After repeated (mean: 1.30 per patient) interventions, R0 was comparable (FAP 93.1% [95%CI 88.0-98.1] vs. SAL 97.0% [95%CI 93.7-100], p=0.194). The overall complication rate was 28.7%. Pancreatitis and bleeding were most common adverse events in both groups. Severe complications were very rare (3.5%). Twenty-one patients in the FAP-group (20.8% [95%CI 12.7-28.8]) and sixteen patients in the SAL-group (15.8% [95%CI 8.6-23.1], p=0.363) had a reccurence . Recurrences occurred later in FAP-patients (25 [95%CI 18.3-31.7] vs. 2 [95%CI CI 0.06-3.9] months).
Conclusions: EP is safe and effective in FAP-related ampullary lesions Criteria for endoscopic resection of AL can be extended to FAP-patients. FAP-patients have a life-time risk to relapse even after complete resection and require long-time-surveillance.
Background: Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Fine Needle Biopsy (EUS-FNB) emerged as a safe, efficacious alternative to Fine Needle Aspiration (FNA) for tissue acquisition. EUS-FNB is reported to have higher diagnostic yield with preservation of specimen tissue architecture. We aimed to evaluate the performance of EUS-FNB with regards to specimen processing as histology rather than cytology. Methods: All EUS-FNA or -FNB from July 2016 to January 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. Data on demographics, EUS findings, pathology, and complications were collected in two periods,
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.