The limited success of the behavioural interventions and the lack of diversity in methods used do not allow identification of the best ways to promote oral health towards adolescents. Therefore, alternative approaches for oral health promotion in adolescents should be explored.
Management of patients with hereditary bleeding disorders in dentistry causes considerable problems. This study examined different aspects of dental health or disease of Lithuanian children and adults with haemophilia and compared them with the general population. Two study groups of cases and controls were formed. Cases were recruited through census sampling and controls were randomly chosen from the general population matched for gender, age and place of residence. Dental health of permanent and deciduous dentitions was assessed by one examiner employing the WHO Criteria for Oral Health Surveys. The following aspects of dental health/disease were considered: overall caries experience, treatment experience, unmet dental treatment needs and the presence of functional dentition. Data were collected from 76 patients with haemophilia among which 27 were children and 49 were adults and a control group of 76 subjects comprising 30 children and 46 adults. Children with haemophilia had a significantly lower overall caries experience and less unmet dental treatment needs in deciduous teeth as compared to healthy children. In permanent dentitions, overall caries experience, unmet dental treatment needs or treatment experience did not differ between cases and controls either in older children or adult cohorts. There were no differences between the study groups regarding the functional dentition-related indices. Healthier deciduous teeth were observed in children with haemophilia than in children without haemophilia, but other dental health or disease-related outcomes did not differ between cases and controls.
Better dental health was observed in children with hemophilia as compared to children without it. There were no differences in dental health between adult hemophiliacs and healthy controls from the general population. None of the linear multiple regression models confirmed hemophilia to be an additional caries risk when it was controlled for other caries determinants.
Objective. The aim of the study was to test if variations in oral hygiene levels in adolescents were associated with locus of control and parenting styles after controlling for demographic factors. Material and Methods. The study sample comprised 237 adolescents aged 12–13 years. The structured questionnaire included demographic characteristics and items about parenting style and locus of control. The Individual Quantitative Plaque % Index (IQPI) and toothbrushing frequency were used as clinical outcome measures. Results. In the bivariate analyses, socioeconomic status (P=0.012), number of children in the family (P=0.003), and frequency of toothbrushing (P=0.001) were related to dental plaque levels. Gender (P<0.001), socioeconomic status (P=0.022), and external locus of control (Spearman rho, –0.144, P=0.027) were statistically significantly associated with toothbrushing frequency. In the multivariate analyses, only socioeconomic status and toothbrushing frequency were statistically significantly related to the IQPI. When toothbrushing frequency as the second outcome variable was used, the IQPI and gender were statistically significant. The association with socioeconomic status did not reach statistical significance (P=0.07). Conclusions. Only socioeconomic status and toothbrushing frequency explained variation in dental plaque levels among adolescents. The expected relationship among parenting styles, locus of control, and oral hygiene levels was not confirmed.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.