Anyone can adopt a child. In Indonesia this can be done if the child to be taken meets the requirements, this of course must be in accordance with applicable laws. However, legal protection in child adoption varies in each region according to customary law that applies in an area. The purpose of this study is to analyze whether a court order can provide legal protection for adopted children. This research is normative legal research with legal data. The results of the study show that the child adoption procedure in Indonesia actually fulfills the principle of legal certainty in accordance with Indonesian law. Laws on adoption include the Law of the Republic of Indonesia No. 23 of 2002, Law of the Republic of Indonesia No.23 of 2006, and Government Regulation Number 54 of 2007.

This study analyzes digital evidence in the judicial process. The application of information technology (e-government) is a must for state administrators, both the judiciary, the legislature, especially the executive. In resolving state administrative disputes, digital evidence is also often used. This requires judges to have the ability to examine and analyze a case that has a digital element. Preparation of the Supreme Court to respond to developments in digitalization of electronic services (e-government), namely the Supreme Court has issued PERMA Number 1 of 2019 concerning Electronic Administration of Cases and Trials in Courts. This time, the E-Court is a form of the Supreme Court's seriousness in reforming the Supreme Court in the field of information technology in the justice system. Efforts that can be made by Administrative Court Judges in the digital era, Administrative Judges must pay attention to the e-government system as a whole, for example Online Single Submission (OSS) licensing, because licensing now involves an integrated online system, which involves elements of regional government, provincial government and government center. how to upload data, the possibility of an error in the system, what is uploaded, how the system can reject and accept data. It is these things that allow administrative judges to involve Web experts. Digital Web forensic experts are needed in proving cases at the Administrative Court, because in my opinion it is almost impossible for an administrative judge to have good and correct knowledge of digital forensics. Web expert witnesses will shed light on an administrative case, making it easier for State Administrative judges to make decisions. The Supreme Court should hold education and training regarding online licensing, online registration, online validation carried out by the executive, and administrative judges should not hesitate to present web expert witnesses to explain an administrative case.

In this research, the use of digital evidence in courts is studied. State administrators, including the executive and the legislative, must use information technology (e-government), especially the judiciary. Digital evidence is also frequently utilised to resolve administrative disputes between states. Judges should be able to look over and evaluate cases that involve digital evidence in order to do this. The Supreme Court has issued PERMA Number 1 of 2019 concerning the Electronic Administration of Cases and Trials in Courts in order to get ready to adapt to changes in the digitalization of electronic services (e-government). This time, the Supreme Court is taking reforming the justice system’s information technology field seriously as seen by the E-Court. Administrative Court Judges can make an effort, but in the digital age, Administrative Judges must pay attention to the entire e-government system. For instance, licencing now involves an integrated online system that includes components of the regional government, the provincial government, and the government centre. These factors make it possible for administrative judges to consult with web professionals. Because it is virtually difficult for an administrative judge to have good and accurate understanding of digital forensics, digital web forensic experts are required when proving matters at the Administrative Court. Web-based experts will provide insight into a case, assisting State Administrative judges in making judgements. The Supreme Court should hold education and training regarding online licensing, online registration, and online validation carried out by the executive. Administrative judges should not hesitate to present web expert witnesses to explain an administrative case.