The diagnosis of epilepsy often relies on a reading of routine scalp electroencephalograms (EEGs). Since seizures are highly unlikely to be detected in a routine scalp EEG, the primary diagnosis depends heavily on the visual evaluation of Interictal Epileptiform Discharges (IEDs). This process is tedious, expert-centered, and delays the treatment plan. Consequently, the development of an automated, fast, and reliable epileptic EEG diagnostic system is essential. In this study, we propose a system to classify EEG as epileptic or normal based on multiple modalities extracted from the interictal EEG. The ensemble system consists of three components: a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN)-based IED detector, a Template Matching (TM)-based IED detector, and a spectral feature-based classifier. We evaluate the system on datasets from six centers from the USA, Singapore, and India. The system yields a mean Leave-One-Institution-Out (LOIO) cross-validation (CV) area under curve (AUC) of 0.826 (balanced accuracy (BAC) of 76.1%) and Leave-One-Subject-Out (LOSO) CV AUC of 0.812 (BAC of 74.8%). The LOIO results are found to be similar to the interrater agreement (IRA) reported in the literature for epileptic EEG classification. Moreover, as the proposed system can process routine EEGs in a few seconds, it may aid the clinicians in diagnosing epilepsy efficiently.

No abstract

Epilepsy diagnosis based on Interictal Epileptiform Discharges (IEDs) in scalp electroencephalograms (EEGs) is laborious and often subjective. Therefore, it is necessary to build an effective IED detector and an automatic method to classify IED-free versus IED EEGs. In this study, we evaluate features that may provide reliable IED detection and EEG classification. Specifically, we investigate the IED detector based on convolutional neural network (ConvNet) with different input features (temporal, spectral, and wavelet features). We explore different ConvNet architectures and types, including 1D (one-dimensional) ConvNet, 2D (two-dimensional) ConvNet, and noise injection at various layers. We evaluate the EEG classification performance on five independent datasets. The 1D ConvNet with preprocessed full-frequency EEG signal and frequency bands (delta, theta, alpha, beta) with Gaussian additive noise at the output layer achieved the best IED detection results with a false detection rate of 0.23/min at 90% sensitivity. The EEG classification system obtained a mean EEG classification Leave-One-Institution-Out (LOIO) cross-validation (CV) balanced accuracy (BAC) of 78.1% (area under the curve (AUC) of 0.839) and Leave-One-Subject-Out (LOSO) CV BAC of 79.5% (AUC of 0.856). Since the proposed classification system only takes a few seconds to analyze a 30-min routine EEG, it may help in reducing the human effort required for epilepsy diagnosis.

Pathological slowing in the electroencephalogram (EEG) is widely investigated for the diagnosis of neurological disorders. Currently, the gold standard for slowing detection is the visual inspection of the EEG by experts, which is time-consuming and subjective. To address those issues, we propose three automated approaches to detect slowing in EEG: Threshold-based Detection System (TDS), Shallow Learning-based Detection System (SLDS), and Deep Learning-based Detection System (DLDS). These systems are evaluated on channel-, segment-, and EEG-level. The three systems perform prediction via detecting slowing at individual channels, and those detections are arranged in histograms for detection of slowing at the segment- and EEG-level. We evaluate the systems through Leave-One-Subject-Out (LOSO) cross-validation (CV) and Leave-One-Institution-Out (LOIO) CV on four datasets from the US, Singapore, and India. The DLDS achieved the best overall results: LOIO CV mean balanced accuracy (BAC) of 71.9%, 75.5%, and 82.0% at channel-, segment- and EEG-level, and LOSO CV mean BAC of 73.6%, 77.2%, and 81.8% at channel-, segment-, and EEG-level. The channel- and segment-level performance is comparable to the intra-rater agreement (IRA) of an expert of 72.4% and 82%. The DLDS can process a 30 min EEG in 4 s and can be deployed to assist clinicians in interpreting EEGs.

Objective: Clinical diagnosis of epilepsy relies partially on identifying Interictal Epileptiform Discharges (IEDs) in scalp electroencephalograms (EEGs). This process is expert-biased, tedious, and can delay the diagnosis procedure. Beyond automatically detecting IEDs, there are far fewer studies on automated methods to differentiate epileptic EEGs (potentially without IEDs) from normal EEGs. In addition, the diagnosis of epilepsy based on a single EEG tends to be low. Consequently, there is a strong need for automated systems for EEG interpretation. Traditionally, epilepsy diagnosis relies heavily on IEDs. However, since not all epileptic EEGs exhibit IEDs, it is essential to explore IEDindependent EEG measures for epilepsy diagnosis. The main objective is to develop an automated system for detecting epileptic EEGs, both with or without IEDs. In order to detect epileptic EEGs without IEDs, it is crucial to include EEG features in the algorithm that are not directly related to IEDs. Approach: In this study, we explore the background characteristics of interictal EEG for automated and more reliable diagnosis of epilepsy. Specifically, we investigate features based on univariate temporal measures (UTM), spectral, wavelet, Stockwell, connectivity, and graph metrics of EEGs, besides patient-related information (age and vigilance state). The evaluation is performed on a sizeable cohort of routine scalp EEGs (685 epileptic EEGs and 1229 normal EEGs) from five centers across Singapore, USA, and India. Main results: In comparison with the current literature, we obtained an improved Leave-One-Subject-Out (LOSO) cross-validation (CV) area under the curve (AUC) of 0.871 (Balanced Accuracy (BAC) of 80.9%) with a combination of 3 features (IED rate, and Daubechies and Morlet wavelets) for the classification of EEGs with IEDs vs. normal EEGs. The IED-independent feature UTM achieved a LOSO CV AUC of 0.809 (BAC of 74.4%). The inclusion of IED-independent features also helps to improve the EEG-level classification of epileptic EEGs with and without IEDs vs. normal EEGs, achieving an AUC of 0.822 (BAC of 77.6%) compared to 0.688 (BAC of 59.6%) for classification only based on the IED rate. Specifically, the addition of IED-independent features improved the BAC by 21% in detecting epileptic EEGs that do not contain IEDs. Significance: These results pave the way towards automated detection of epilepsy. We are one of the first to analyse epileptic EEGs without IEDs, thereby opening up an underexplored option in epilepsy diagnosis.