Chromatin mobility is thought to facilitate homology search during homologous recombination and to shift damage either towards or away from specialized repair compartments. However, unconstrained mobility of double-strand breaks could also promote deleterious chromosomal translocations. Here we use live time-lapse fluorescence microscopy to track the mobility of damaged DNA in budding yeast. We found that a Rad52-YFP focus formed at an irreparable double-strand break moves in a larger subnuclear volume than the undamaged locus. In contrast, Rad52-YFP bound at damage arising from a protein-DNA adduct shows no increase in movement. Mutant analysis shows that enhanced double-strand-break mobility requires Rad51, the ATPase activity of Rad54, the ATR homologue Mec1 and the DNA-damage-response mediator Rad9. Consistent with a role for movement in the homology-search step of homologous recombination, we show that recombination intermediates take longer to form in cells lacking Rad9.

Induced transcription through CAG repeats in human cells increases repeat contraction approximately 15-fold in both confluent and proliferating cells. Repeats are stabilized against contraction by siRNA knockdown of MSH2, MSH3 or XPA, but not by knockdown of MSH6, XPC or FEN1. These results define a pathway for CAG.CTG repeat contraction that is initiated by transcription, depends on elements of mismatch and nucleotide-excision repair and does not require DNA replication.

Chromatin in the interphase nucleus moves in a constrained random walk. Despite extensive study, the molecular causes of such movement and its impact on DNA-based reactions are unclear. Using high-precision live fluorescence microscopy in budding yeast, we quantified the movement of tagged chromosomal loci to which transcriptional activators or nucleosome remodeling complexes were targeted. We found that local binding of the transcriptional activator VP16, but not of the Gal4 acidic domain, enhances chromatin mobility. The increase in movement did not correlate strictly with RNA polymerase II (PolII) elongation, but could be phenocopied by targeting the INO80 remodeler to the locus. Enhanced chromatin mobility required Ino80's ATPase activity. Consistently, the INO80-dependent remodeling of nucleosomes upon transcriptional activation of the endogenous PHO5 promoter enhanced chromatin movement locally. Finally, increased mobility at a double-strand break was also shown to depend in part on the INO80 complex. This correlated with increased rates of spontaneous gene conversion. We propose that local chromatin remodeling and nucleosome eviction increase large-scale chromatin movements by enhancing the flexibility of the chromatin fiber.[Keywords: chromatin remodeling; nuclear organization; transcription; VP16; Ino80; fluorescence microscopy; homologous recombination] Supplemental material is available for this article.Received August 15, 2011; revised version accepted January 13, 2012.DNA-based transactions such as transcription, replication, and repair take place in distinct nuclear subcompartments. Transcriptional silencing is frequently associated with the nuclear envelope or occurs near nucleoli (Towbin et al. 2009), whereas the activation of tissue-specific genes correlates with a shift of the relevant genes away from the nuclear periphery (Egecioglu and Brickner 2011). In contrast, genes activated under conditions of nutrient or temperature stress move to nuclear pores when they are induced (Taddei 2007). Finally, some types of damagenamely, irreparable DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs), collapsed replication forks, and eroded telomeres-relocate to nuclear pores to be processed for repair, unlike DSBs that can be repaired by recombination with a homologous template (for review, see Nagai et al. 2010). For these relocalization events to occur, whether at a promoter, a replication fork, or a DSB, chromatin must be mobile.Rapid time-lapse fluorescence microscopy of GFP-LacItagged genomic loci has shown that individual chromosomal domains move constantly in a near-random walk within a restrained volume of the nucleus (Hubner and Spector 2010). The measured radius of constraint for the movement of an average chromosomal locus (;0.6 mm) was roughly similar in every species investigated, although mobility was also shown to be influenced by local chromatin context (Marshall et al. 1997;Heun et al. 2001;Vazquez et al. 2001;Chubb et al. 2002;Gartenberg et al. 2004). For instance, lacO arrays inserted near budding yeast ce...

Persistent DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are recruited to the nuclear periphery in budding yeast. Both the Nup84 pore subcomplex and Mps3, an inner nuclear membrane (INM) SUN domain protein, have been implicated in DSB binding. It was unclear what, if anything, distinguishes the two potential sites of repair. Here, we characterize and distinguish the two binding sites. First, DSB-pore interaction occurs independently of cell-cycle phase and requires neither the chromatin remodeler INO80 nor recombinase Rad51 activity. In contrast, Mps3 binding is S and G2 phase specific and requires both factors. SWR1-dependent incorporation of Htz1 (H2A.Z) is necessary for break relocation to either site in both G1- and S-phase cells. Importantly, functional assays indicate that mutations in the two sites have additive repair defects, arguing that the two perinuclear anchorage sites define distinct survival pathways.

Mechanistic analyses based on improved imaging techniques have begun to explore the biological implications of chromatin movement within the nucleus. Studies in both prokaryotes and eukaryotes have shed light on what regulates the mobility of DNA over long distances. Interestingly, in eukaryotes, genomic loci increase their movement in response to double-strand break induction. Break mobility, in turn, correlates with the efficiency of repair by homologous recombination. We review here the source and regulation of DNA mobility and discuss how it can both contribute to and jeopardize genome stability.