ObjectivePatients’ non-adherence to medical prescriptions is a crucial issue in contemporary medicine because it can jeopardize care efficacy. Non-adherence is especially frequent in patients with chronic diseases. In this article, we propose that a particular condition, which we call disruption in time projection, is a cause of non-adherence to medication therapies in chronic diseases.MethodsA questionnaire was administered to 120 hospitalized people with type 2 diabetes addressing three psychological constructs defining time projection: patience/impatience in a fictive monetary scenario (preferring to receive €1,500 in 1 year or €500 today), magnitude of temporal horizon (greater or lesser ability to imagine future events) and perception of the degree of physical similarity of current self to self at 1 year, 5 years and 10 years from the present. In addition, the questionnaire evaluated adherence to medication, social deprivation and depression.ResultsIn the multivariate analyses, two factors were associated with adherence to medication: patience (P<0.001) and long temporal horizon (P=0.006). Two factors were associated with HbA1c ≥8% (64 mmol/mol): non-adherence to medication (P=0.003) and short temporal horizon (P=0.011). Three factors were associated with long temporal horizon: adherence to medication (P<0.001), patience (P<0.001) and the existence of grandchildren (P=0.002). Social deprivation (P<0.001), non-adherence (P<0.001), female gender (P=0.002) and short temporal horizon (P=0.050) were associated with impatience. Finally, an association of adherence to expected similarity in the future to current self, impatience, short temporal horizon, social deprivation and depression was also shown in a multiple correspondence analysis.ConclusionWhat we termed a disruption in time projection may be a unique determinant for non-adherence to long-term therapy and, therefore, may influence the outcome of chronic diseases. We hypothesize that this is involved in both intentional and unintentional non-adherence and that it represents the loss of a protective mechanism. If this novel concept is to be confirmed in other settings and generalized to other chronic diseases, the recognition of its role in disease prognosis may help orient the teaching and practice of medicine.

Ischemic microangiopathy was clearly identified in sickle cell disease (SCD) using fluorescein angiography. A prospective observational clinical study was conducted to assess the foveal avascular zone (FAZ) area and explore perifoveal microvasculature changes in the superficial (SCP) and deep (DCP) capillary plexus using optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) and compare two genotypes—HbS/HbS (HbSS) and HbS/HbC (HbSC)-to control. All consecutive patients with electrophoretic confirmation of SCD were included. Swept-source OCTA scans (Triton Plus, Topcon, Tokyo, Japan) with a 3 × 3-mm scanning area and ultra-wide field (UWF) retinography (California, Optos, Fife, Scotland) were recorded for all patients. For OCTA analysis, preset parameters were used to segment the SCP and DCP. The FAZ area was manually assessed. The number of vascular branching points was automatically assessed based on the vascular skeletonization using ImageJ software. Eyes were staged based on Goldberg’s classification of SCD retinopathy (SCDR) using UWF imaging. Forty-six eyes of 24 patients were included in the HbSS (n = 27) and HbSC (n = 19) groups and 16 eyes of 8 unaffected patients in a control group. In the DCP, the FAZ was significantly larger in the HbSC (p = 0.0001) and HbSS (p = 0.0004) groups compared to controls. The FAZ area in the SCP, CRT and number of superficial vascular branching points did not significantly differ between both genotypes. There were less branching points in the HbSC (p = 0.034) and HbSS (p = 0.0014) groups than in controls. The Goldberg stage was significantly higher in the HbSC group than in the HbSS group (2.21 vs. 1.22, p = 0.0062). OCTA provides useful information on macular microvasculature and structural alterations associated with SCDR. Ischemic abnormalities are more predominant in the DCP in case of SCDR and no difference was found between genotypes of patients visually asymptomatic.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract