No abstract

To evaluate whether different deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) extraction procedures can affect estimates of bacterial community composition, based on the 16S ribosomal ribonucleic acid gene denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) profiles, we compared four in situ lysis procedures using three soils and one marine sediment. Analysis of DGGE profiles, generated by polymerase chain reaction of purified DNA extracts, demonstrated that the choice of DNA extraction method significantly influenced the bacterial community profiles generated. This was reflected both in the number of bands or ribotypes detected from each sample and in subsequent principle coordinate analysis and unweighted-pair group method using arithmetic average analyses. The methods also differed significantly in their robustness, i.e. reproducibility across multiple analyses. Two methods, both based on bead beating, were demonstrated to be suitable for comparative studies of a range of soil and sediment types.

BackgroundNowadays, the vast majority of chemicals are either synthesised from fossil fuels or are extracted from agricultural commodities. However, these production approaches are not environmentally and economically sustainable, as they result in the emission of greenhouse gases and they may also compete with food production. Because of the global agreement to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, there is an urgent interest in developing alternative sustainable sources of chemicals. In recent years, organic waste streams have been investigated as attractive and sustainable feedstock alternatives. In particular, attention has recently focused on the production of caproate from mixed culture fermentation of low-grade organic residues. The current approaches for caproate synthesis from organic waste are not economically attractive, as they involve the use of two-stage anaerobic digestion systems and the supplementation of external electron donors, both of which increase its production costs. This study investigates the feasibility of producing caproate from food waste (FW) without the supplementation of external electron donors using a single-phase reactor system.ResultsReplicate leach-bed reactors were operated on a semi-continuous mode at organic loading of 80 g VS FW l−1 and at solid retention times of 14 and 7 days. Fermentation, rather than hydrolysis, was the limiting step for caproate production. A higher caproate production yield 21.86 ± 0.57 g COD l−1 was achieved by diluting the inoculating leachate at the beginning of each run and by applying a leachate recirculation regime. The mixed culture batch fermentation of the FW leachate was able to generate 23 g caproate COD l−1 (10 g caproate l−1), at a maximum rate of 3 g caproate l−1 day−1 under high H2 pressure. Lactate served as the electron donor and carbon source for the synthesis of caproate. Microbial community analysis suggested that neither Clostridium kluyveri nor Megasphaera elsdenii, which are well-characterised caproate producers in bioreactors systems, were strongly implicated in the synthesis of caproate, but that rather Clostridium sp. with 99% similarity to Ruminococcaceae bacterium CPB6 and Clostridium sp. MT1 likely played key roles in the synthesis of caproate. This finding indicates that the microbial community capable of caproate synthesis could be diverse and may therefore help in maintaining a stable and robust process.ConclusionsThese results indicate that future, full-scale, high-rate caproate production from carbohydrate-rich wastes, associated with biogas recovery, could be envisaged. Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1186/s13068-018-1101-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Aims:  The objective of this work was to provide functional evidence of key metabolic pathways important for anaerobic digestion processes through the identification of highly expressed proteins in a mixed anaerobic microbial consortium. Methods and Results:  The microbial communities from an anaerobic industrial‐like wastewater treatment bioreactor were characterized using phylogenetic analyses and metaproteomics. Clone libraries indicated that the bacterial community in the bioreactor was diverse while the archaeal population was mainly composed of Methanocorpusculum‐like (76%) micro‐organisms. Three hundred and eighty‐eight reproducible protein spots were obtained on 2‐D gels, of which 70 were excised and 33 were identified. The putative functions of the proteins detected in the anaerobic bioreactor were related to cellular processes, including methanogenesis from CO2 and acetate, glycolysis and the pentose phosphate pathway. Metaproteomics also indicated, by protein assignment, the presence of specific micro‐organisms in the bioreactor. However, only a limited overlap was observed between the phylogenetic and metaproteomic analyses. Conclusions:  This study provides some direct evidence of the microbial activities taking place during anaerobic digestion. Significance and Impact of Study:  This study demonstrates metaproteomics as a useful tool to uncover key biochemical pathways underpinning specific anaerobic bioprocesses.

No abstract