SUMMARY Vertigo in and around MRI machines has been noted for years [1, 2]. Several mechanisms have been suggested to explain these sensations [3, 4], yet without direct, objective measures, the cause is unknown. We found that all healthy human subjects lying in the static magnetic field of an MRI machine develop a robust nystagmus. Patients lacking labyrinthine function do not. Here we use the pattern of eye movements as a measure of vestibular stimulation to show that the stimulation is static (continuous, proportional to static magnetic field strength, requiring neither head movement nor dynamic change in magnetic field strength) and directional (sensitive to magnetic field polarity and head orientation). Our calculations and geometric model suggest that magnetic vestibular stimulation derives from a Lorentz force due to interaction between the magnetic field and naturally-occurring ionic currents in the labyrinthine endolymph fluid. This force pushes on the semicircular canal cupula, leading to nystagmus. We emphasize that the unique, dual role of endolymph in the delivery of both ionic current and fluid pressure, coupled with the cupula’s function as a pressure sensor, makes magnetic field induced nystagmus and vertigo possible. Such effects could confound fMRI studies of brain behavior, including resting-state brain activity.

Lateral trunk flexion is a very common clinical observation in patients affected by Parkinson's disease. Postural control is known to depend on vestibular, visual, and somatosensory information. The aim of this study was to investigate whether impairment of vestibular function can account for the postural alterations observed in parkinsonian patients with lateral trunk flexion. We evaluated vestibular function in 11 parkinsonian patients with lateral trunk flexion and in 11 age-, sex-, and disease duration-matched patients without lateral trunk flexion. The following vestibular tests were performed: infrared videonystagmography including fast and slow ocular movements, spontaneous-positional and evoked nystagmus search with and without visual fixation, fast positioning maneuvers, the bithermal caloric test, and the vibration test. A peripheral, unilateral vestibular hypofunction was identified in all patients with lateral trunk flexion. The vestibular hypofunction was ipsilateral to the leaning side and contralateral to the most affected parkinsonian side in all patients. In the control group, 7 subjects had no vestibular signs; 4 subjects had unilateral vestibular hypofunction without clinically evident lateral trunk flexion. Two of the latter patients subsequently developed lateral trunk flexion ipsilateral to the vestibular deficit and contralateral to the side most affected by Parkinson's disease. The processing of vestibular information was impaired in parkinsonian patients affected by lateral trunk flexion. The impairment was at least in part responsible for the patients' postural abnormality. We propose that the acronym PISA (Postural Imbalance Syndrome with vestibular Alterations) be used to describe the specific postural change observed in parkinsonian patients affected by a vestibular defect and lateral trunk flexion.

We provide novel evidence for abnormal thalamic functional response to vestibular stimulation in patients with VM. These functional abnormalities in central vestibular processing may contribute to VM pathophysiology.