SUMMARY To ensure the completion of DNA replication and maintenance of genome integrity, DNA repair factors protect stalled replication forks upon replication stress. Previous studies have identified a critical role for the tumor suppressors BRCA1 and BRCA2 in preventing the degradation of nascent DNA by the MRE11 nuclease after replication stress. Here we show that depletion of SMARCAL1, a SNF2-family DNA translocase that remodels stalled forks, restores replication fork stability and reduces the formation of replication stress-induced DNA breaks and chromosomal aberrations in BRCA1/2-deficient cells. In addition to SMARCAL1, other SNF2-family fork remodelers, including ZRANB3 and HLTF, cause nascent DNA degradation and genomic instability in BRCA1/2-deficient cells upon replication stress. Our observations indicate that nascent DNA degradation in BRCA1/2-deficient cells occurs as a consequence of MRE11-dependent nucleolytic processing of reversed forks generated by fork remodelers. These studies provide mechanistic insights into the processes that cause genome instability in BRCA1/2-deficient cells.
SummaryBrca2 deficiency causes Mre11-dependent degradation of nascent DNA at stalled forks, leading to cell lethality. To understand the molecular mechanisms underlying this process, we isolated Xenopus laevis Brca2. We demonstrated that Brca2 protein prevents single-stranded DNA gap accumulation at replication fork junctions and behind them by promoting Rad51 binding to replicating DNA. Without Brca2, forks with persistent gaps are converted by Smarcal1 into reversed forks, triggering extensive Mre11-dependent nascent DNA degradation. Stable Rad51 nucleofilaments, but not RPA or Rad51T131P mutant proteins, directly prevent Mre11-dependent DNA degradation. Mre11 inhibition instead promotes reversed fork accumulation in the absence of Brca2. Rad51 directly interacts with the Pol α N-terminal domain, promoting Pol α and δ binding to stalled replication forks. This interaction likely promotes replication fork restart and gap avoidance. These results indicate that Brca2 and Rad51 prevent formation of abnormal DNA replication intermediates, whose processing by Smarcal1 and Mre11 predisposes to genome instability.
Edited by Wilhelm JustCoordination between DNA replication and DNA repair ensures maintenance of genome integrity, which is lost in cancer cells. Emerging evidence has linked homologous recombination (HR) proteins RAD51, BRCA1 and BRCA2 to the stability of nascent DNA. This function appears to be distinct from double-strand break (DSB) repair and is in part due to the prevention of MRE11-mediated degradation of nascent DNA at stalled forks. The role of RAD51 in fork protection resembles the activity described for its prokaryotic orthologue RecA, which prevents nuclease-mediated degradation of DNA and promotes replication fork restart in cells challenged by DNA-damaging agents. Here, we examine the mechanistic aspects of HR-mediated fork protection, addressing the crosstalk between HR and replication proteins.Keywords: DNA recombination; DNA replication; genome stability BRCA1, BRCA2, RAD51 and the RAD51 paralogs family, which consists of five proteins (RAD51B, RAD51C, RAD51D, XRCC2 and XRCC3) in mammalian cells, are required to repair DNA damage by homologous recombination (HR). Mutations in most of these genes predispose to cancer, indicating an important role of DNA damage repair in preventing cell transformation. Intriguingly, complete loss of function of most of HR proteins is incompatible with life in vertebrate organisms [1,2,3]. These features together with their ability to form foci in unperturbed and challenged S-phase nuclei indicate a role for HR proteins in chromosomal DNA replication even in unchallenged conditions [4,5].The mechanisms underlying the function of DNA repair proteins in unchallenged chromosomal DNA replication are poorly understood. This is in part due to the fact that many of the genes involved in DNA metabolism are essential for cell viability, which complicate their study, especially in higher eukaryotes [1,2,3]. The reasons why HR genes are essential for cell viability in higher eukaryotes are unclear. One explanation might be that they have a specific and direct role in the replication of complex eukaryotic genomes. Alternatively, complex genomes might be more vulnerable to spontaneous DNA damage, which might irreversibly halt replication progression inducing chromosomes breakage. HR factors might be therefore required to repair the damage and to complete whole genome duplication. Here we review the links between HR proteins and the DNA replication machinery, some of which appear to be conserved between prokaryotes and eukaryotes.
Half of human genome is made of repetitive DNA. However, mechanisms underlying replication of chromosome regions containing repetitive DNA are poorly understood. We reconstituted replication of defined human chromosome segments using Bacterial Artificial Chromosomes (BACs) in Xenopus laevis egg extract. Using this approach we characterized chromatin assembly and replication dynamics of centromeric alpha-satellite DNA. Proteomic analysis of centromeric chromatin revealed replication dependent enrichment of a network of DNA repair factors among which the MSH2-6 complex, which was required for efficient centromeric DNA replication. However, contrary to expectations, the ATR dependent checkpoint monitoring DNA replication fork arrest could not be activated on highly repetitive DNA due to inability of single stranded DNA binding protein RPA to accumulate on chromatin. Electron microscopy of centromeric DNA and supercoil mapping revealed the presence of Topoisomerase I dependent DNA loops embedded in a protein matrix enriched for SMC2-4 proteins. This arrangement suppressed ATR signalling by preventing RPA hyper-loading, facilitating replication of centromeric DNA. These findings have important implications on our understanding of repetitive DNA metabolism and centromere organization under normal and stressful conditions.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.