Background. Malnutrition and physical inactivity are common in patients with advanced cancer and are associated with poor outcomes. There are increasing data that altered body composition is related to the pharmacokinetic properties of cancer therapies. These adverse conditions may impact outcomes in early-phase oncology clinical trials. Materials and Methods. We aimed to understand the relationships between baseline nutrition and exercise status with important trial endpoints including treatment-related toxicity and survival. Baseline assessments of nutrition and exercise status were conducted in patients prior to initiation of phase I and II oncology clinical trials. Patients were followed prospectively for the onset of adverse events. Tumor response and survival data were also obtained. Fisher's exact test and chi-square analysis were used to determine statistical significance. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to compare patient duration on study and survival.Results. One hundred patients were recruited, of whom 87 were initiating a phase I trial. Sixty percent were initiating trials studying immunotherapeutic agents. Critical malnutrition was found in 39% of patients, and 52% were sedentary. Patients who were malnourished had significantly increased rates of grade ≥ 3 toxicity (p = .001), hospitalizations (p = .001), and inferior disease control rate (p = .019). Six-month overall survival was significantly reduced in malnourished patients versus nonmalnourished patients (47% vs. 84%; p = .0003), as was median duration on study (48 days vs. 105 days; p = .047). Being sedentary at baseline was associated with decreased duration on study (57 days vs. 105 days; p = .019). Conclusion. Malnutrition and sedentary lifestyle are highly prevalent in patients enrolling on early-phase oncology clinical trials and are associated with poor outcomes. The quality of data from these studies may be compromised as a result of these pre-existing conditions. The Oncologist 2020;25:161-169 Implications for Practice: Phase I and II trials are critical steps in the development of effective cancer therapeutics, yet only a small percentage of agents are ultimately approved for human cancer care. Despite increasing awareness of the interactions between malnutrition, sarcopenia, and treatment-related outcomes such as toxicity and response, these factors are not commonly incorporated into therapeutic decision making at the time of clinical trial consideration. Nutritional status and physical performance may be key biomarkers of mechanisms mediating treatment-related toxicity, dose modifications, risk of hospitalizations, and success of novel agents. This study advocates that a baseline nutritional assessment and early nutritional support may improve tolerability and response to experimental therapies.

770 Background: Patients (pts) with cancer, in particular GI malignancies, are vulnerable to CMN from both tumor-related digestive symptoms and treatment-related toxicity (TRT). CMN is associated with poor cancer outcomes, including reduced quality of life, poor treatment tolerance and decreased survival. P1/2 trial participants are not routinely screened for CMN or potentially associated psychological and physical activity impairments. Methods: Baseline assessments of nutrition (PG-SGA), distress (NCCN-DT), anxiety (HADS-A), depression (HADS-D), and sedentary lifestyle (SL, Godin-LTQ) were conducted in pts beginning a P1/2 trial. CMN was defined as a PG-SGA score of ≥9. Statistical significance was determined by Fisher’s exact test. A regression model was used to identify a composite predictor of CMN. Results: 100 pts (87% P1, 13% P2) were enrolled. Results of assessments are shown in Table 1. 39% of pts had CMN and 52% had a SL. CMN was more common in non-whites (p = 0.05) and those on P1 trials (p = 0.073). No differences were noted by age, gender, or prior lines of therapy. CMN was strongly associated with depression (p < 0.001) and SL (p < 0.001). 31 pts had GI malignancies [CRC (15), pancreas (8), and other (8)]. CMN was more prevalent in GI pts than non-GI (61% vs 29%, p = 0.004). When evaluating the predictive value of commonly used clinical indicators for CMN such as BMI ( < 25), weight loss (WL) past 2 weeks, or WL past month, having 2/3 of these indicators was the optimal cut-point predictor of CMN (76% sensitivity, 85% specificity). TRT data collection is ongoing. Conclusions: CMN and SL are highly prevalent in P1/2 trial pts, particularly in those with GI cancers and minorities. CMN is strongly associated with depression and SL. A composite clinical indicator (BMI + WL) may be most useful in screening for CMN. Urgent nutritional interventions in these participants may be warranted in light of magnified mortality and toxicity risks. [Table: see text]

TPS8054 Background: DARA, a human anti-CD38 IgGκ monoclonal antibody, is approved in many countries as monotherapy in relapsed/refractory MM (RRMM) and in combination with standard of care (SoC) in RRMM and NDMM. However, no clinical studies have yet compared DARA maintenance versus SoC maintenance. The ongoing phase 3 AURIGA study will evaluate the addition of DARA to lenalidomide maintenance among pts with NDMM who are MRD positive after SoC induction and ASCT. The primary endpoint is the conversion rate to MRD negativity after 1 year of maintenance therapy. Methods: This open-label, multicenter, randomized phase 3 study will enroll approximately 214 pts in the United States aged 18-79 years with NDMM who receive ≥4 cycles of induction followed by ASCT. Pts must enroll within 6 months of ASCT, be naïve for anti-CD38 treatment, have a very good partial response or better per IMWG criteria, and be MRD positive at a threshold of 10–5 by next generation sequencing (NGS) within 30 days of screening. Pts will be stratified by cytogenetic risk (high vs standard/unknown) and randomized 1:1 to 28-day cycles of lenalidomide maintenance (10 mg PO; D1-28 [dose increasing to 15 mg if tolerated]) ± DARA SC (DARA 1,800 mg co-formulated with recombinant human hyaluronidase PH20 [rHuPH20; 2,000 U/mL; ENHANZE® drug delivery technology, Halozyme, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA; QW Cycle 1-2, Q2W Cycles 3-6, Q4W C7+). Treatment will continue for up to 36 cycles or until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or patient withdrawal. The primary endpoint is MRD conversion rate after 12 months of maintenance treatment, defined as the proportion of pts who achieve MRD negativity (10–5) by NGS. Additional MRD assessments occur after 18, 24, and 36 months of maintenance. While MRD negativity is associated with improved long-term outcomes for pts with MM and is an emerging, validated prognostic factor, this study is among the first to use MRD negativity as a primary study endpoint. Importantly, MRD negativity allows for earlier efficacy assessment than traditional endpoints such as progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints include overall MRD conversion rate at any time, sustained MRD negativity lasting ≥12 months, PFS, OS, response rates, duration of complete response, changes in health-related quality of life, and safety. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, this study has been amended to improve enrollment access by allowing up to 12 months from start of induction therapy to ASCT to mitigate against ASCT delays and to allow greater flexibility for screening and laboratory assessments. Clinical trial information: NCT03901963.

Introduction: Daratumumab, a CD38 monoclonal antibody, was approved for the treatment of heavily pretreated relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (MM) in 2015 and for newly diagnosed MM (NDMM) in 2018. The phase 3 MAIA study demonstrated that daratumumab plus lenalidomide/dexamethasone (D-Rd) improved clinical outcomes, including overall survival, versus lenalidomide/dexamethasone (Rd) in transplant-ineligible NDMM (Facon T, et al. EHA Library. 2021). However, limited real-world data are available regarding patients with MM treated with daratumumab in the US. We evaluated patient characteristics and treatment outcomes among transplant-ineligible NDMM patients who received D-Rd as first-line therapy in US oncology practices. Methods: This retrospective, observational cohort study evaluated patients from the Flatiron MM Core Registry who received first-line D-Rd between November 1, 2015 and February 28, 2021. The Flatiron Health electronic health record (EHR)-derived deidentified database has longitudinal patient-level records for patients treated at community oncology practices and academic medical centers across the US. The index date was the date of the first observed record of the D-Rd regimen. Patients aged &lt;18 years on the index date, enrolled in a clinical trial on the index date, with other malignancies prior to the index date, with a diagnosis of amyloid light-chain amyloidosis prior to the index date, or with hematopoietic stem cell transplant from the diagnosis date to the index date were excluded. Patient characteristics analyzed included age at time of D-Rd initiation, race, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) score, International Staging System (ISS) stage, frailty, and presence of comorbidities such as diabetes and acute renal impairment. Time-to-next-treatment and progression-free survival (PFS) were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: From November 1, 2015 to February 28, 2021, 1,721 patients were identified from the Flatiron MM Core Registry as patients treated with a daratumumab-based regimen; 120 (7.0%) of the 1,721 patients were treated with a daratumumab-based regimen as first-line therapy, and 35 (29.2%) of the 120 patients were identified as eligible patients treated with D-Rd as first-line therapy. For patients treated with first-line D-Rd (n=35), the mean age as of the index date was 73.5 years (SD: 7.9). Most patients were White (72.4%), had an ECOG PS score of 1 (51.9%), and had an ISS stage of II (38.1%) or III (42.9%). Of these patients, 15 (42.9%) patients were ≥75 years of age, 4 (11.4%) were Black or African American, 4 (11.4%) had high-risk cytogenetics, 21 (60.0%) were frail, 6 (17.1%) had diabetes, and 6 (17.1%) had acute renal impairment. The median time from the initial diagnosis date to the index date was 1.2 months and the median follow-up was 8.0 months. The median PFS was not reached in this study. The estimated 6-month PFS rate was 91.6%, 9-month PFS rate was 81.0%, and 12-month PFS rate was 73.6% (Figure). After 15 months of follow-up, an estimated 80.5% of patients had not received their next treatment. Conclusions: The real-world population of patients who received D-Rd as first-line therapy is similar to the population studied in MAIA. The early trend of PFS is also similar to that in MAIA, with the majority of patients progression free at 6, 9, and 12 months. Greater understanding of long-term outcomes among transplant-ineligible NDMM patients who received D-Rd as first-line therapy at US oncology practices is needed to further facilitate the safe and effective use of daratumumab. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Tai: Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC: Current Employment. Cai: Janssen: Current Employment. Fu: Janssen: Current Employment. Khare: Janssen: Current Employment. Kaila: Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC: Current Employment.

e21700 Background: Cancer therapies undergo evaluation in P1/2 trials, frequently in patients (pts) with disrupted caloric intake, weight loss, and other adverse effects of cancer on physical and psychological functioning. CMN and sarcopenia may increase treatment related toxicity (TRT) due to acquired pharmacokinetic variability and altered drug metabolism. Little is known about the prevalence of CMN among pts enrolling on P1/2 trials, its association with abnormal physical and psychological functioning, and its role in mediating TRT. Methods: Pts initiating a P1/2 trial were recruited. Study acceptance rate was > 95%. Pts had a comprehensive nutritional assessment using the validated PG-SGA, a short, 3-5 minute tool that evaluates multiple nutritional domains [symptom burden, functional status, metabolic stress and physical exam (muscle/fat status)]. CMN is defined as a PG-SGA score of ≥ 9. Distress, anxiety, depression and physical activity were also measured. BMI and albumin were extracted from the chart. Statistical significance was determined by Fisher’s exact test. Results: 54 pts (85% P1) were enrolled. CMN was identified in 39%. Pts with gastrointestinal (GI) cancers were more likely to have CMN than non-GI cancers (75% vs 24%, p = 0.001); otherwise, CMN rates were not different by age ( < 60 vs 60+), gender, race, or trial phase (1 vs 2). CMN was also associated with number of lines of therapy, but was surprisingly less common among patients with > 2 therapies compared to those with 0-2 (29% vs 57%, p = 0.051). Strong associations of CMN to distress (p = 0.028), depression (p = 0.020) and sedentary lifestyle (p = 0.012) were also seen. Clinical “red flags” of MN such as low BMI ( < 25) and low albumin ( < 3.5) had poor sensitivity (66.7% and 33.3%) and specificity (57.6% and 78.8%) for CMN. Correlation of CMN to TRT is underway. Conclusions: CMN is prevalent among P1/2 trial pts, notably in those with GI cancers and with fewer lines of therapy, and is associated with physical inactivity, distress and depression. BMI and albumin are poorly predictive of CMN. Undiagnosed CMN may, through multiple pathways, increase the vulnerability of pts on P1/2 studies to TRT. Comprehensive nutritional assessment of P1/2 pts should be considered.