This work proposes a novel strategy for social learning by introducing the critical feature of adaptation. In social learning, several distributed agents update continually their belief about a phenomenon of interest through: i) direct observation of streaming data that they gather locally; and ii) diffusion of their beliefs through local cooperation with their neighbors. Traditional social learning implementations are known to learn well the underlying hypothesis (which means that the belief of every individual agent peaks at the true hypothesis), achieving steady improvement in the learning accuracy under stationary conditions. However, these algorithms do not perform well under nonstationary conditions commonly encountered in online learning, exhibiting a significant inertia to track drifts in the streaming data. In order to address this gap, we propose an Adaptive Social Learning (ASL) strategy, which relies on a small step-size parameter to tune the adaptation degree. First, we provide a detailed characterization of the learning performance by means of a steady-state analysis. Focusing on the small step-size regime, we establish that the ASL strategy achieves consistent learning under standard global identifiability assumptions. We derive reliable Gaussian approximations for the probability of error (i.e., of choosing a wrong hypothesis) at each individual agent. We carry out a large deviations analysis revealing the universal behavior of adaptive social learning: the error probabilities decrease exponentially fast with the inverse of the step-size, and we characterize the resulting exponential learning rate. Second, we characterize the adaptation performance by means of a detailed transient analysis, which allows us to obtain useful analytical formulas relating the adaptation time to the step-size. The revealed dependence of the adaptation time and the error probabilities on the step-size highlights the fundamental trade-off between adaptation and learning emerging in adaptive social learning.

This work examines a distributed learning problem where the agents of a network form their beliefs about certain hypotheses of interest. Each agent collects streaming (private) data and updates continually its belief by means of a diffusion strategy, which blends the agent's data with the beliefs of its neighbors. We focus on weakly-connected graphs, where the network is partitioned into sending and receiving sub-networks, and we allow for heterogeneous models across the agents. First, we examine what agents learn (social learning) and provide an analytical characterization for the long-term beliefs at the agents. Among other effects, the analysis predicts when a leader-follower behavior is possible, where some sending agents control the beliefs of the receiving agents by forcing them to choose a particular and possibly fake hypothesis. Second, we consider the dual or reverse learning problem that reveals how agents learn: given the beliefs collected at a receiving agent, we would like to discover the influence that any sending sub-network might have exerted on this receiving agent (topology learning). An unexpected interplay between social and topology learning emerges: given H hypotheses and S sending sub-networks, topology learning can be feasible when H ≥ S. The latter being only a necessary condition, we then examine the feasibility of topology learning for two useful classes of problems. The analysis reveals that a critical element to enable topology learning is a sufficient degree of diversity in the statistical models of the sending sub-networks.

This work studies the learning abilities of agents sharing partial beliefs over social networks. The agents observe data that could have risen from one of several hypotheses and interact locally to decide whether the observations they are receiving have risen from a particular hypothesis of interest. To do so, we establish the conditions under which it is sufficient to share partial information about the agents' belief in relation to the hypothesis of interest. Some interesting convergence regimes arise.

This work addresses the problem of sharing partial information within social learning strategies. In traditional social learning, agents solve a distributed multiple hypothesis testing problem by performing two operations at each instant: first, agents incorporate information from private observations to form their beliefs over a set of hypotheses; second, agents combine the entirety of their beliefs locally among neighbors. Within a sufficiently informative environment and as long as the connectivity of the network allows information to diffuse across agents, these algorithms enable agents to learn the true hypothesis. Instead of sharing the entirety of their beliefs, this work considers the case in which agents will only share their beliefs regarding one hypothesis of interest, with the purpose of evaluating its validity, and draws conditions under which this policy does not affect truth learning. We propose two approaches for sharing partial information, depending on whether agents behave in a self-aware manner or not. The results show how different learning regimes arise, depending on the approach employed and on the inherent characteristics of the inference problem. Furthermore, the analysis interestingly points to the possibility of deceiving the network, as long as the evaluated hypothesis of interest is close enough to the truth.

No abstract