Background: Status dystonicus (SD) is a rare and potentially life-threatening complication of primary or secondary dystonia, characterized by acute worsening of dystonic movements. There is no consensus regarding optimal treatment, which may be medical and/or surgical. Methods: We present our experience with pallidal deep brain stimulation (DBS) in 5 DYT1-positive patients with SD and provide a review of the literature to examine optimal management. Results: Of the 5 patients treated with pallidal DBS, all experienced postoperative resolution of their dystonic crisis within a range of 1-21 days. Long-term follow-up resulted in 1 patient returning to preoperative baseline, 3 patients improving from baseline, and 1 patient making a complete recovery. Of the 28 SD patients (including our 5 patients) reported in the literature who were treated with DBS or ablative surgery, 26 experienced cessation of their dystonic crisis with a return to baseline function and, in most cases, clinical improvement. Conclusion: DBS is an effective therapeutic modality for the treatment of SD. In addition to the long-term benefits of stimulation, early and aggressive treatment may improve the overall outcome.

No abstract

KeywordsElectronic health records, quality improvement, critical care, surgical intensive care SummaryBackground: The electronic health record (EHR) is increasingly viewed as a means to provide more coordinated, patient-centered care. Few studies consider the impact of EHRs on quality of care in the intensive care unit (ICU) setting. Objectives: To evaluate key quality measures of a surgical intensive care unit (SICU) following implementation of the Epic EHR system in a tertiary hospital. Methods: A retrospective chart review was undertaken to record quality indicators for all patients admitted to the SICU two years before and two years after EHR implementation. Data from the twelve-month period of transition to EHR was excluded. We collected length of stay, mortality, central line associated blood stream infection (CLABSI) rates, Clostridium difficile (C. diff.) colitis rates, readmission rates, and number of coded diagnoses. To control for variation in the patient population over time, the case mix indexes (CMIs) and APACHE II scores were also analyzed. Results: There was no significant difference in length of stay, C. diff. colitis, readmission rates, or case mix index before and after EHR. After EHR implementation, the rate of central line blood stream infection (CLABSI) per 1 000 catheter days was 85% lower (2.16 vs 0.39; RR, 0.18; 95% CI, 0.05 to 0.61, p < .005), and SICU mortality was 28% lower (12.2 vs 8.8; RR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.06 to 1.71, p < .01). Moreover, after EHR there was a significant increase in the average number of coded diagnoses from 17.8 to 20.8 (p < .000). Conclusions: EHR implementation was statistically associated with reductions in CLABSI rates and SICU mortality. The EHR had an integral role in ongoing quality improvement endeavors which may explain the changes in CLABSI and mortality, and this invites further study of the impact of EHRs on quality of care in the ICU.

Our study indicated that LNR is an independent predictor of survival for patients with carcinoid tumors but was no better than N1/N0 for 10-year survival.