Abstract. Quantitative precipitation forecast (QPF) is still a challenge for numerical weather prediction (NWP), despite the continuous improvement of models and data assimilation systems. In this regard, the assimilation of radar reflectivity volumes should be beneficial, since the accuracy of analysis is the element that most affects short-term QPFs. Up to now, few attempts have been made to assimilate these observations in an operational set-up, due to the large amount of computational resources needed and due to several open issues, like the rise of imbalances in the analyses and the estimation of the observational error. In this work, we evaluate the impact of the assimilation of radar reflectivity volumes employing a local ensemble transform Kalman filter (LETKF), implemented for the convection-permitting model of the COnsortium for Small-scale MOdelling (COSMO). A 4-day test case on February 2017 is considered and the verification of QPFs is performed using the fractions skill score (FSS) and the SAL technique, an object-based method which allows one to decompose the error in precipitation fields in terms of structure (S), amplitude (A) and location (L). Results obtained assimilating both conventional data and radar reflectivity volumes are compared to those of the operational system of the Hydro-Meteo-Climate Service of the Emilia-Romagna Region (Arpae-SIMC), in which only conventional observations are employed and latent heat nudging (LHN) is applied using surface rainfall intensity (SRI) estimated from the Italian radar network data. The impact of assimilating reflectivity volumes using LETKF in combination or not with LHN is assessed. Furthermore, some sensitivity tests are performed to evaluate the effects of the length of the assimilation window and of the reflectivity observational error (roe). Moreover, balance issues are assessed in terms of kinetic energy spectra and providing some examples of how these affect prognostic fields. Results show that the assimilation of reflectivity volumes has a positive impact on QPF accuracy in the first few hours of forecast, both when it is combined with LHN or not. The improvement is further slightly enhanced when only observations collected close to the analysis time are assimilated, while the shortening of cycle length worsens QPF accuracy. Finally, the employment of too small a value of roe introduces imbalances into the analyses, resulting in a severe degradation of forecast accuracy, especially when very short assimilation cycles are used.

The assimilation of radar reflectivity data is of great interest for numerical weather prediction (NWP) models at the convective scale since these observations are very dense both in space and time and they are related to microphysical prognostic variables. So far, the assimilation of reflectivity in operational frameworks has been limited to derived products, like precipitation rates and humidity profiles. This approach is also adopted at ARPAE‐SIMC, the Hydro‐Meteo‐Climate Structure of the Regional Agency for Prevention, Environment and Energy of Emilia‐Romagna region in Italy, where latent heat nudging (LHN) is employed to assimilate precipitation rates in the COSMO‐2I model, the convection‐permitting version of the regional model developed by the COnsortium for Small‐scale MOdelling (COSMO) which is run operationally to provide high‐resolution forecasts over Italy. However, to fully exploit the information contained in these observations, the whole reflectivity volume should be directly assimilated. Nevertheless, despite several promising studies, its implementation in an operational framework has not yet been achieved. In this study, a set‐up designed to assimilate reflectivities operationally in the COSMO‐2I model through a local ensemble transform Kalman filter (LETKF) has been evaluated over 37 days in 2018 and performed 303 forecasts. The comparison with the current operational set‐up based on LHN reveals an average improvement in quantitative precipitation forecasts (QPFs) up to 7 hr, even if the impact on convective cases is much stronger than that observed in conditions of stratiform precipitation. Moreover, a small but positive impact is noticed for the RMSE of upper‐air variables, while the impact on bias is mixed. Mixed results are also obtained when considering surface variables. In the light of the results of this study, a pre‐operational parallel system in which COSMO‐2I analyses are generated replacing LHN by the direct assimilation of reflectivity volumes was implemented in April 2020.

Abstract. Quantitative precipitation forecast (QPF) is still a challenge for numerical weather prediction (NWP), despite the continuous improvement of models and data assimilation systems. In this regard, the assimilation of radar reflectivity volumes should be beneficial, since the accuracy of analysis is the element that most affects short-term QPFs. Up to now, very few attempts have been made to assimilate these observations in an operational set-up, due to the large amount of computational resources needed and to several open issues, like the arise of imbalances in the analyses and the estimation of the observational 5

No abstract