No abstract

Recently, an increasing number of works have introduced models capable of generating natural language explanations (NLEs) for their predictions on vision-language (VL) tasks. Such models are appealing because they can provide human-friendly and comprehensive explanations. However, there is still a lack of unified evaluation approaches for the explanations generated by these models. Moreover, there are currently only few datasets of NLEs for VL tasks. In this work, we introduce e-ViL, a benchmark for explainable vision-language tasks that establishes a unified evaluation framework and provides the first comprehensive comparison of existing approaches that generate NLEs for VL tasks. e-ViL spans four models and three datasets. Both automatic metrics and human evaluation are used to assess modelgenerated explanations. We also introduce e-SNLI-VE, the largest existing VL dataset with NLEs (over 430k instances). Finally, we propose a new model that combines UNITER [15], which learns joint embeddings of images and text, and GPT-2 [38], a pre-trained language model that is well-suited for text generation. It surpasses the previous state-of-the-art by a large margin across all datasets.

Recommender systems are facing scrutiny because of their growing impact on the opportunities we have access to. Current audits for fairness are limited to coarse-grained parity assessments at the level of sensitive groups. We propose to audit for envy-freeness, a more granular criterion aligned with individual preferences: every user should prefer their recommendations to those of other users. Since auditing for envy requires to estimate the preferences of users beyond their existing recommendations, we cast the audit as a new pure exploration problem in multi-armed bandits. We propose a sample-efficient algorithm with theoretical guarantees that it does not deteriorate user experience. We also study the trade-offs achieved on real-world recommendation datasets.