It has been known for over 40 years that there are two fundamentally different kinds of detection tasks in the theory of signal detectability. The Type 1 task is to distinguish between events defined independently of the observer; the Type 2 task is to distinguish between one's own correct and incorrect decisions about those Type 1 events. For the Type 1 task, the behavior of the detector can be summarized by the traditional receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. This curve can be compared with a theoretical ROC curve, which can be generated from overlapping probability functions conditional on the Type 1 events on an appropriate decision axis. We show how to derive the probability functions underlying Type 2 decisions from those for the Type 1 task. ROC curves and the usual measures of performance are readily obtained from those Type 2 functions, and some relationships among various Type 1 and Type 2 performance measures are presented. We discuss the relationship between Type 1 and Type 2 confidence ratings and caution against the practice of presenting transformed Type 2 ratings as empirical Type 1 ratings.

Psychophysical estimates of cochlear function suggest that normal-hearing listeners exhibit a compressive basilar-membrane (BM) response. Listeners with moderate to severe sensorineural hearing loss may exhibit a linearized BM response along with reduced gain, suggesting the loss of an active cochlear mechanism. This study investigated how the BM response changes with increasing hearing loss by comparing psychophysical measures of BM compression and gain for normal-hearing listeners with those for listeners who have mild to moderate sensorineural hearing loss. Data were collected from 16 normal-hearing listeners and 12 ears from 9 hearing-impaired listeners. The forward masker level required to mask a fixed low-level, 4000-Hz signal was measured as a function of the masker-signal interval using a masker frequency of either 2200 or 4000 Hz. These plots are known as temporal masking curves (TMCs). BM response functions derived from the TMCs showed a systematic reduction in gain with degree of hearing loss. Contrary to current thinking, however, no clear relationship was found between maximum compression and absolute threshold.

Psychophysical estimates of compression often assume that the basilar-membrane response to frequencies well below characteristic frequency (CF) is linear. Two techniques for estimating compression are described here that do not depend on this assumption at low CFs. In experiment 1, growth of forward masking was measured for both on- and off-frequency pure-tone maskers for pure-tone signals at 250, 500, and 4000 Hz. The on- and off-frequency masking functions at 250 and 500 Hz were just as shallow as the on-frequency masking function at 4000 Hz. In experiment 2, the forward masker level required to mask a fixed low-level signal was measured as a function of the masker-signal interval. The slopes of these functions did not differ between signal frequencies of 250 and 4000 Hz for the on-frequency maskers. At 250 Hz, the slope for the 150-Hz masker was almost as steep as that for the on-frequency masker, whereas at 4000 Hz the slope for the 2400-Hz masker was much shallower than that for the on-frequency masker. The results suggest that there is substantial compression, of around 0.2-0.3 dB/dB, at low CFs in the human auditory system. Furthermore, the results suggest that at low CFs compression does not vary greatly with stimulation frequency relative to CF.

The mammalianauditorysystemincludesabrainstem-mediatedefferentpathwayfromthesuperiorolivarycomplexbywayofthemedialolivocochlear system,whichreducesthecochlearresponsetosound (WarrandGuinan,1979;Libermanetal.,1996).Thehumanmedialolivocochlearresponsehasan onsetdelayofbetween25and40msandriseanddecayconstantsintheregionof280and160ms,respectively(BackusandGuinan,2006).Physiological studies with nonhuman mammals indicate that onset and decay characteristics of efferent activation are dependent on the temporal and level characteristics of the auditory stimulus (Bacon and Smith, 1991; Guinan and Stankovic, 1996). This study uses a novel psychoacoustical masking technique usingaprecursorsoundtoobtainameasureoftheefferenteffectinhumans.Thistechniqueavoidsconfoundscurrentlyassociatedwithotherpsychoacousticalmeasures.Bothtemporalandleveldependencyoftheefferenteffectwasmeasured,providingacomprehensivemeasureoftheeffectofhuman auditoryefferentsoncochleargainandcompression.Resultsindicatethataprecursor(Ͼ20dBSPL)inducedefferentactivation,resultinginadecrease in both maximum gain and maximum compression, with linearization of the compressive function for input sound levels between 50 and 70 dB SPL. Estimatedgaindecreasedasprecursorlevelincreased,andincreasedasthesilentintervalbetweentheprecursorandcombinedmasker-signalstimulus increased, consistent with a decay of the efferent effect. Human auditory efferent activation linearizes the cochlear response for mid-level sounds while reducing maximum gain.

The eyes receive slightly different views of the world, and the differences between their images (binocular disparity) are used to see depth. Several authors have suggested how the brain could exploit this information for three-dimensional (3D) motion perception, but here we consider a simpler strategy. Visual direction is the angle between the direction of an object and the direction that an observer faces. Here we describe human behavioral experiments in which observers use visual direction, rather than binocular information, to estimate an object's 3D motion even though this causes them to make systematic errors. This suggests that recent models of binocular 3D motion perception may not reflect the strategies that human observers actually use.