Підвищення попиту на відпочинок у лісах карпатського регіону ставить перед управлінцями лісового господарства нові виклики, пов'язані з формуванням рекреаційно привабливих лісів. Оптимізувати рекреаційне лісокористування можна через відповідне регулювання кількісного та якісного складу лісів, посилення їх сприятливого впливу на природне середовище та повноцінне виконання ними екосистемних (передовсім соціальних) послуг. Для реалізації цього завдання необхідне інтегральне та об'єктивне оцінювання їх стану і рекреаційного потенціалу. Для встановлення лісівничо-таксаційних і ландшафтно-рекреаційних особливостей рекреаційно-оздоровчих лісів Івано-Франківщини проаналізовано дані лісовпорядкування 2010 р. Оцінено вплив рекреантів на стан деревостанів та їх рекреаційний потенціал на прикладі трьох постійних дослідних об'єктів (далі – ПДО), розташованих у рекреаційно-оздоровчих лісах області. З'ясовано, що зі семи підкатегорій захисності рекреаційно-оздоровчих лісів найбільша частка припадає на лісогосподарську та лісопаркову частини лісів зелених зон навколо населених пунктів (70 та 20 % відповідно). За групами типів лісу переважають грабово-дубові ліси (39 %), а за віком – середньовікові насадження (59 %). Частка лісів з низькою рекреаційною оцінкою становить 65 %, середньою – 24 % і високою – 11 %. Понад 80 % лісів цієї категорії росте на висоті до 430 м н.р.м. На основі здійснених досліджень на трьох ПДО встановлено, що стадії рекреаційної дигресії є незначними, угруповання є "умовно непорушені" і належать до категорії "нормального росту та розвитку". За шістьма класами ІUFRO встановлено, що на ПДО Вістова-1-20 та Рибне-2-20 показник товарності деревини є нижчим від середнього. На ПДО Рибне-2-20 показник класу довжини крони є також нижчим від середнього. Решта показників на цих ділянках є вищими або наближеними до середніх. На ПДО Підлюте-3-20 показники усіх класів вищі від середніх.

The article reveals the features of accounting and analytical support for entrepreneurial risk management. It was found that entrepreneurial risk is a certain act as a result of which the business entity may suffer losses. It is proved that entrepreneurial risks should be classified according to the specifics of origin, the specifics of the legal settlement, the specifics of industry affiliation, the specifics of the consequences, the specifics of the duration of the impact of entrepreneurial risk, the specifics of the expression of will, the specifics of the form, the specifics of the level of typicality, the specifics of the level of validity, the specifics of the possibility of assessing and resolving the impact, the specifics of the possibility of insuring entrepreneurial risks, the specifics of the occurrence of entrepreneurial risks by sources of origin, the specifics of the scale of the impact, the specifics of the level of losses and the specifics of character. It is established that the process of entrepreneurial risk management is the process of managing the activities of the business entity as a whole and its individual parts, and takes into account the management of not only existing risks but also potential entrepreneurial risks in space and time, that may occur in the future during entrepreneurial activities. It is determined that the process of entrepreneurial risk management should take into account the stage of preparation and implementation of appropriate measures to reduce the risk as a result of making erroneous decisions by business entities, the stage of reducing the impact of possible negative consequences that may occur, especially, if the entity operates in unexpected changes and alarming development trends, as well the stage of development and implementation of the Declaration on Risk Management and the Risk Management Program. It is established that the important information on which it is possible to estimate possibility of occurrence of entrepreneurial risks, is the accounting reporting. In the perspective of further research, it is recommended to study entrepreneurial risks in Ukraine in the context of such aspects as causes, consequences and management.

No abstract

The article is devoted to the study of guarantees as an element of the legal status of a judge. The article considers the effectiveness of justice by the judiciary as an independent branch of state power, which is entrusted with the function of protecting the rights and legitimate interests of persons in the state. It is argued that the right to judicial protection can be properly realized only if there is an effective mechanism of judicial protection, which becomes real if there are guarantees for the activity of a judge. The independence and independence of the judiciary is due to the constitutional principle of separation of powers, proclaimed in the Constitution of Ukraine. However, it is in democracies that this principle acquires special significance, because we are talking about legally enshrined guarantees and effective mechanisms of «containment and balances» in the organization and activities of various branches of government. Each of the branches of government – legislative, executive and judicial, independently performs only its inherent functions, not obeying each other. Decisions are made by the judiciary due to their independence, because no additional approval by the bodies of other branches of government is required. The most important prerequisite for this is the protection of the judiciary from unlawful influence or interference from other actors. Only an independent judiciary can become the guarantor of the rule of law, the implementation of effective and accessible justice and a fair judicial decision of cases in the state. The guarantees of the judge's activity in the administration of justice are divided into three groups: guarantees of the procedural activity of the judge as the bearer of judicial power, the subject of the process; organizational and legal guarantees for the activity of a judge as a person holding a public office and is a member of the judicial community; social and legal guarantees of a judge as a citizen with a special legal status, limited in civil rights by legislation on the status of judges and occupying a separate position in society.

The article reveals the features of ensuring the personal safety of judges in Ukraine. An analysis of the main normative documents related to ensuring the personal safety of judges in Ukraine is presented. It is determined that judges, as court employees, have the right to demand and receive assistance for personal protection, as well as protection of their property and housing by the relevant law enforcement agencies and other state bodies. It was found that ensuring the personal safety of judges is the duty and task of the Judicial Protection Service, a special unit of the National Police of Ukraine, the State Emergency Service of Ukraine, the National Guard of Ukraine. It is established that for encroachment on the life of judges, their health, destruction or damage to their property, threats in the form of murder, violence or damage to property, insult or slander, encroachment on the life and health of their families, threats in the form of their murder, violence or damage to their property, their insults or slander related to the administration of justice by judges, there is a legal liability provided by law. It is noted that the prospects for further research in this area are to study the features of ensuring the independence and inviolability of judges in Ukraine, taking into account foreign experience in this area.