High-dose therapy is an effective standard treatment for multiple myeloma patients. Evidence that intermediate-dose therapy improves survival is limited. At diagnosis, about 70% of patients are older than 65. Intermediate-dose regimen is very well tolerated in older patients. In a multicenter study, 194 patients were randomized to receive at diagnosis either conventional chemotherapy (6 courses of oral melphalan and prednisone [MP]) or intermediate-dose therapy (2 courses of melphalan at 100 mg/m 2 [MEL100]) with stem cell support. Response rate was higher after MEL100. Near-complete remission (nCR) was 6% after MP and 25% after MEL100 (P ‫؍‬ .0002). At 3 years, MEL100 increased event-free survival (EFS) from 16% to 37% and overall survival (OS) from 62% to 77% (P < .001). Similar results were observed in patients aged 65 to 70: nCR was 8% after MP and 25% after MEL100 (P ‫؍‬ .05); at 3 years, MEL100 improved EFS from 18% to 31% (P ‫؍‬ .01) and OS from 58% to 73% (P ‫؍‬ .01). Patients aged 65 to 70 had a median OS of 37.2 months (MP) versus 58 months (MEL100

These results indicate that FM is superior to CHOP for front-line treatment of FL and that rituximab is an effective sequential treatment option. However, they also confirm that this superiority is unlikely to translate into either better PFS or OS.

Because many studies have focused on growth factors in multiple myeloma, the study of the cytokine network appears to be useful for this purpose. Interleukin-6 (IL-6) and IL-2 with their soluble receptors (IL-3, IL-4, IL-10, and IL-11) have been examined. Plasma cells may produce IL-6 by an autocrine mechanism whereas a paracrine mechanism is believed to be involved in the production of IL-6 by bone However, the concomitant evaluation of all immunologic parameters could be more useful than the value of a single IL. Serum levels of IL-6, sIL-6R, sIL-2R, and the expression of membrane-bound IL-2 receptors, both on bone marrow plasma cells and on peripheral blood mononuclear cells, are correlated with disease activity and disease stage. In addition, IL-6 and sIL-6R serum levels are believed to be correlated with the duration of disease-free survival because a high serum level at the time of diagnosis is believed to be correlated with a short duration of survival. However, some laboratory parameters may express the same prognostic value as high ␤ 2 microglobulin and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) serum levels together with a high plasma cell labeling index are correlated with disease activity.Furthermore, if the evaluation is performed at the time of diagnosis, high values of these parameters are correlated with a short disease-free survival. A correlation between laboratory parameters and the serum level of several cytokines was demonstrated. Hence, the real advantage of the prognostic evaluation of cytokines is reserved for patients who do not exhibit uniform results with regard to ␤ 2 microglobulin and LDH serum levels, or, better, for borderline cases. With regard to the differential diagnosis, all immunologic parameters should be evaluated concomitantly rather than separately to confer a real prognostic value to results. Furthermore, a particular relation was found between a high sIL-6R serum level and a poor response to chemotherapy, therefore suggesting the possibility of identifying in advance a subset of patients with a high risk of treatment failure, as has already been demonstrated in other hematologic malignancies.Finally, the majority of studies indicate that interferons are used mainly in the immunotherapy for multiple myeloma, whereas many clinical trials should still be required for the evaluation of the effectiveness of anti-I-L6 antibodies or antiidiotypic vaccines in reference to the eligible patients for these particular therapies.