The choice of treatment for perforation in a healthy esophagus depends mainly on the site and size of the lesion. Cervical lesions may be amenable to conservative treatment or require primary surgical repair, while thoracic lesions with associated sepsis or major loss of substance demand an aggressive approach, with esophageal resection and delayed reconstruction seeming to be the safest option.

Preoperative inflammatory biomarkers such as the Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratio (PLR) and the Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR) strongly predict the outcome in surgically treated patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), while nutritional biomarkers such as the Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) and the Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI) show an analogue prognostic value in hepatic resection (HR) but not in liver transplant (LT) cases. Data on the impact of LT on the inflammatory and nutritional/metabolic function are heterogeneous. Therefore, we investigated the post-LT trend of these biomarkers up to postoperative month (POM) 12 in 324 HCC patients treated with LT. Inflammatory biomarkers peaked in the early post-LT period but at POM 3 leveled off at values similar (NLR) or higher (PLR) than pre-LT ones. CONUT and PNI worsened in the early post-LT period, but at POM 3 they stabilized at significantly better values than pre-LT. In LT recipients with an overall survival >1 year and no evidence of early HCC recurrence, 1 year post-LT NLR and PNI independently predicted patient overall survival, while 1 year post-LT PLR independently predicted late tumor recurrence. In conclusion, at 1 year post-LT, the nutritional status of liver-transplanted HCC patients significantly improved while their inflammatory state tended to persist. Consequently, post-LT PLR and NLR maintained a prognostic value for LT outcome while post-LT CONUT and PNI acquired it.

No abstract

No abstract

Background The Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) score is a newly developed laboratory‐derived immunonutritional score which has been validated as prognostic marker for survival and tumor recurrence in surgically treated patients with various tumor types, including hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The aim of the present study was to test the CONUT score performance in HCC patients treated with liver transplantation (LT). Methods A retrospective study on a bi‐centers cohort of 280 HCC patients submitted to LT between 2006 and 2017 was performed. Indication to LT was limited to Milan criteria or UCSF criteria, defined by preoperative imaging. Results Median pre‐LT CONUT score was 5 (interquartile range 3‐7). Overall patients' survival at 1, 3, and 5 years was 84%, 76.6%, and 68.3%, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that HCC recurrence (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.987, P = .012] and pre‐LT neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) (HR = 1.064, P = .003) were independent risk factors for reduced survival. Cumulative incidence of HCC recurrence at 1, 3, and 5 years was 5.1%, 11.5%, and 15.5%, respectively. Pre‐LT platelet‐to‐lymphocyte ratio (PLR) (subdistribution hazard ratio [SHR] = 1.086, P = .044], tumor max diameter (SHR = 1.695, P < .001), and bilobar tumor distribution (SHR = 6.892, P = .006) were independent risk factors for tumor recurrence. The CONUT score did not show any prognostic value. Conclusions The CONUT score did not predict poor survival or tumor recurrence in LT recipients.