All patients experienced complete relief of their headaches postoperatively. There has been no recurrence of symptoms in any of the patients during a mean follow-up period of 19 months (range 3-58 months; 16 person-years of cumulative follow up). Complications consisted of transient intracranial hypertension in one patient and leg numbness in another patient. Although the disease is often self-limiting, surgical treatment has an important role in the management of spontaneous spinal CSF leaks. Surgery is effective in eliminating the headaches and the morbidity is generally low. Surgical exploration for a focal CSF leak, as demonstrated on radiographic studies, usually does not reveal a clear source of the leak. Some patients may have multiple simultaneous CSF leaks.
A comprehensive review of the literature has shown that the treatment of choice for cerebellar astrocytomas has primarily been gross-total resection of the mass and gross-total resection of the enhancing portion of pilocytic astrocytomas. Most large scale studies of postresection survival rates of patients with cerebellar astrocytomas were conducted when computerized tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging were not readily available. It has been shown that postoperative CT scans or MR images are more reliable than the surgeon's estimate of the degree of tumor resection at the time of surgery. It is not possible, therefore, to make an accurate determination regarding a postresection prognosis based on the degree of suspected tumor resection without the availability of appropriate radiographic imaging. In this study, the authors retrospectively evaluated the treatment of 54 patients with cerebellar astrocytoma who underwent surgery at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota, from 1978 through 1990. Preoperative and postoperative CT scans or MR images were available in all 54 patients.
A tumor model involving stereotactically implanted culture-reared tumor cells is presented. Stainless steel cannulas were stereotactically and permanently implanted into the caudate nucleus of 30 rats. The animals were separated into two groups. In Group I, 15 animals received a 10-microliters injection containing 10(6) C6 glioblastoma cells (five rats), 10(6) Walker 256 breast carcinoma cells (five rats), or cell medium (five rats). The coordinates were A(+1.5), L(+3.0), and DV(-5.0). In Group II, the coordinates were changed to A(+1.0), L(+3.0), and DV(-5.0) and the same number of rats received a 1-microliter injection containing 10(5) cells of each tumor in an attempt to produce more focal tumors. Two weeks after implantation, brain sections were stained with cresyl violet and a subset was stained for glial fibrillary acid protein (GFAP). A computerized morphometric analysis system was used to quantify tumor size. In Group I, the mean C6 tumor areas (+/- standard error of the mean) at specific coordinates were (in sq mm): A(+4.7) 0.4 +/- 0.2; A(+3.7) 3.5 +/- 1.1; A(+2.7) 5.7 +/- 1.7; A(+1.7) 9.5 +/- 2.3; A(+0.7) 7.5 +/- 3.2; A(-0.3) 3.7 +/- 2.9; and A(-1.3) 0.3 +/- 0.3. A nearly identical tumor mass and extension into the brain was produced in rats injected with Walker 256 cells. Similar C6 tumor areas were indicated in adjacent sections stained with cresyl violet and GFAP. Tumor was found in the caudate nucleus in all 10 rats, but not in the nucleus accumbens, fornix, or hippocampus. In Group II animals, tumor magnitude and extension into the brain were greatly reduced. The 10(6) cells in the 10-microliters volume was the most reliable tumor load for obtaining uniform tumors in different animals. The similarity of tumor distribution across different animals was indicated by the low variance of tumor area at specific anteroposterior coordinates. Reproducible and well-circumscribed caudate nucleus tumors were produced using this stereotactic procedure.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.