Twenty-three different EFF mixtures were placed in trenches simulating utility cuts during March through May of 2001. All EFF mixtures were tested for flow, unit weight, gravimetric air content, suitability for load application, and compressive strength development over time. The trenches were excavated in March 2003. Excavation difficulty was correlated with laboratory compressive strength for non-air-entrained mixtures. Bearing capacity estimates with the dynamic cone penetration apparatus were determined for all trenches. Nine EFF mixtures were used to assess the impact of Portland cement content and ASTM C 618 Class F fly ash content. Portland cement contents of 17.8, 26.7, and 35.6 kg/m3 and ASTM C 618 Class F fly ash contents of 178, 219.5, and 261 kg/m3 were used to evaluate the impact of component proportions. Proportions for the EFF mixtures were chosen using Kentucky Transportation Cabinet and Tennessee Ready Mixed Concrete Association (TRMCA) recommendations as well as a previous Tennessee Technological University research mixture. Six EFF mixtures were used to assess the impact of Portland cement content and high-unburned carbon fly ash content. Portland cement contents of 26.7 and 35.6 kg/m3 and high-unburned carbon fly ash contents of 219.5, 261, and 302.5 kg/m3 were used to evaluate the impact of component proportions. The influence of aggregate type on EFF mixtures was evaluated by using five different aggregate types in the EFF mixture recommended by TRMCA (26.7 kg/m3 Portland cement and 219.5 kg/m3 ASTM C 618 Class F fly ash). In addition, four comparison EFF mixtures were also used in the study (1 Tennessee Department of Transportation (TDOT) and 3 air-entrained EFF mixtures).

The current literature indicates that air voids of Portland Cement Pervious Pavements (PCPP) should be 15–25%, to achieve desired permeability. However, there is no current AASHTO or ASTM test method to determine PCPP air voids. This study is an attempt to modify currently available hot-mix asphalt (HMA) air determination techniques for PCPP. The equation used to determine air voids in HMA is Percent Air Voids=100(1−Gmb/Gmm). Where Gmb is the bulk specific gravity of the specimen and Gmm is the theoretical maximum specific gravity of loose HMA. Previous research on HMA cores at Tennessee Technological University (TTU) has shown the INSTROTEK CORELOK SYSTEM to be a most effective means of determining Gmb of a material with surface accessible voids. Therefore, it was selected for determining Gmb of the PCPP cores. Gmm of PCPP cores must be determined in a compacted condition. Therefore, three modified techniques for determining the “effective” G” of PCPP were used. Air voids calculated from the effective Gmm will be referred to as effective air voids. Specifically, effective air voids are air voids accessible from the surface, which effect PCPP permeability. Thirty-three field PCPP cores were used in the study. The “cut bag method” using the INSTROTEK CORELOK SYSTEM was found to be the most accurate in determining the effective air voids of the PCPP cores. Further, compressive strengths of all cores were also determined. As expected, compressive strength of PCPP cores was inversely related to effective air voids. Correlation coefficients ranged from 0.367–0.989.

Twenty-three different EFF mixtures were placed in trenches simulating utility cuts during March through May of 2001. All EFF mixtures were tested for flow, unit weight, gravimetric air content, suitability for load application, and compressive strength development over time. The trenches were excavated in March 2003. Excavation difficulty was correlated with laboratory compressive strength for non-air-entrained mixtures. Bearing capacity estimates with the dynamic cone penetration apparatus were determined for all trenches. Nine EFF mixtures were used to assess the impact of Portland cement content and ASTM C 618 Class F fly ash content. Portland cement contents of 17.8, 26.7, and 35.6 kg/m3 and ASTM C 618 Class F fly ash contents of 178, 219.5, and 261 kg/m3 were used to evaluate the impact of component proportions. Proportions for the EFF mixtures were chosen using Kentucky Transportation Cabinet and Tennessee Ready Mixed Concrete Association (TRMCA) recommendations as well as a previous Tennessee Technological University research mixture. Six EFF mixtures were used to assess the impact of Portland cement content and high-unburned carbon fly ash content Portland cement contents of 26.7 and 35.6 kg/m3 and high-unburned carbon fly ash contents of 219.5, 261, and 302.5 kg/m3 were used to evaluate the impact of component proportions. The influence of aggregate type on EFF mixtures was evaluated by using five different aggregate types in the EFF mixture recommended by TRMCA (26.7 kg/m3 Portland cement and 219.5 kg/m3 ASTM C 618 Class F fly ash). In addition, four comparison EFF mixtures were also used in the study (1 Tennessee Department of Transportation (TDOT) and 3 air-entrained EFF mixtures).

A high-flow, rapid-set, non-excavatable CLSM mixture called ZOOM was developed for applications where time was critical using normal concrete component materials. The following criteria were established for the ZOOM mixture: • Pass the ASTM D 6024 in 6 h or less regardless of subgrade moisture conditions • Little or no bleeding or shrinkage • Flow as per ASTM D 6103 greater than 222 mm • Greater than 207 kPa compressive strength as per ASTM D 4832 in 24 h • Be able to perform using a wide variety of Tennessee aggregates The development of the ZOOM mixture began in the laboratory in May 2002 using Ohio River Sand (ORS). Subsequently, the mixture proportions were adjusted to produce the desired plastic and hardened properties with other Tennessee fine aggregates. Three successful field demonstrations using different fine aggregates were held across Tennessee in the fall of 2002. ZOOM CLSM met compressive strength development and time of suitability for load application performance criteria at every field demonstration.Plastic properties were adequate but failed to meet the established criteria on two occasions. Fine aggregate properties such as gradation and angularity were found to dictate mixture proportions required to achieve flow, air content, and bleeding characteristics. Average air temperature and CLSM air content were found to be important to time of suitability for load application. The research effort was co-sponsored by the Tennessee Department of Transportation and the Tennessee Ready Mixed Concrete Association

A high-flow, rapid-set, non-excavatable CLSM mixture called ZOOM was developed for applications where time was critical using normal concrete component materials. The following criteria were established for the ZOOM mixture: • Pass the ASTM D 6024 in 6 h or less regardless of subgrade moisture conditions • Little or no bleeding or shrinkage • Flow as per ASTM D 6103 greater than 222 mm • Greater than 207 kPa compressive strength as per ASTM D 4832 in 24 h • Be able to perform using a wide variety of Tennessee aggregates The development of the ZOOM mixture began in the laboratory in May 2002 using Ohio River Sand (ORS). Subsequently, the mixture proportions were adjusted to produce the desired plastic and hardened properties with other Tennessee fine aggregates. Three successful field demonstrations using different fine aggregates were held across Tennessee in the fall of 2002. ZOOM CLSM met compressive strength development and time of suitability for load application performance criteria at every field demonstration. Plastic properties were adequate but failed to meet the established criteria on two occasions. Fine aggregate properties such as gradation and angularity were found to dictate mixture proportions required to achieve flow, air content, and bleeding characteristics. Average air temperature and CLSM air content were found to be important to time of suitability for load application. The research effort was cosponsored by the Tennessee Department of Transportation and the Tennessee Ready Mixed Concrete Association