With different styles of faulting, the eastern Ionian Sea is an ideal natural laboratory to investigate interactions between adjacent faults during strong earthquakes. The 2018 Mw 6.8 Zakynthos earthquake, well recorded by broadband and strong-motion networks, provides an opportunity to resolve such faulting complexity. Here, we focus on waveform inversion and backprojection of strong-motion data, partly checked by coseismic Global Navigation Satellite System data. We show that the region is under subhorizontal southwest–northeast compression, enabling mixed thrust faulting and strike-slip (SS) faulting. The 2018 mainshock consisted of two fault segments: a low-dip thrust, and a dominant, moderate-dip, right-lateral SS, both in the crust. Slip vectors, oriented to southwest, are consistent with plate motion. The sequence can be explained in terms of trench-orthogonal fractures in the subducting plate and reactivated faults in the upper plate. The 2018 event, and an Mw 6.6 event of 1997, occurred near three localized swarms of 2016 and 2017. Future numerical models of the slab deformation and ocean-bottom seismometer observations may illuminate possible relations among earthquakes, swarms, and fluid paths in the region.

No abstract

[1] We propose a new strategy to reveal the spatialtemporal evolution of the earthquake rupture process from near-regional data, without assuming a constant rupture velocity. The approach is based on a conjugate gradient method, for which we express analytically the required waveform-misfit derivative with respect to slip on the fault. The derivative is given by back-propagation of residual seismograms towards the source. A good initial source approximation is necessary, being obtained from hypocenter location and centroid-moment tensor solution. The iterative approach then gradually reveals major characteristics of the source process. As an application, we investigate a line source model of a damaging Mw6.3 earthquake in Greece, revealing predominantly unilateral rupture propagation and two or three main slip patches, one of which being significantly delayed, indicating a temporary rupture arrest. The region of largest slip coincides with the region of least abundant aftershocks between hypocenter and centroid. The method has application potential for shakemaps, emergency response, and/or aftershock hazard assessment.

We investigate a seismic crisis that occurred in the western Gulf of Corinth (Greece) between December 2020 and February 2021. This area is the main focus of the Corinth Rift Laboratory (CRL) network, and has been closely monitored with local seismological and geodetic networks for 20 yr. The 2020–2021 seismic crisis evolved in three stages: It started with an Mw 4.6 event near the northern shore of the Gulf, opposite of Aigion, then migrated eastward toward Trizonia Island after an Mw 5.0 event, and eventually culminated with an Mw 5.3 event, ∼3  km northeast of the Psathopyrgos fault. Aftershocks gradually migrated westward, triggering another cluster near the junction with the Rion–Patras fault. Moment tensor inversion revealed mainly normal faulting; however, some strike-slip mechanisms also exist, composing a complex tectonic regime in this region dominated by east–west normal faults. We employ seismic and geodetic observations to constrain the geometry and kinematics of the structures that hosted the major events. We discuss possible triggering mechanisms of the second and third stages of the sequence, including fluids migration and aseismic creep, and propose potential implications of the Mw 5.3 mainshock for the seismic hazard of the region.

Physical laws governing friction on shallow faults in the Earth and spatial heterogeneity of parameters are critical to our understanding of earthquake physics and the assessment of earthquake hazards. Here we use a laboratory-derived fault-friction law and high-quality strong-motion seismic recordings of the 2020 Elazığ earthquake, Turkey, to reveal the complex rupture dynamics. We discover an initial Mw 5.8 rupture stage and explain how cascading behavior of the event, involving at least three episodes, each of M > 6, caused it to evolve into a large earthquake, contrarily to other M5+ events on this part of the East Anatolian Fault. Although the dynamic stress transfer during the rupture did not overcome the strength of the uppermost ~5 kilometers, surface ruptures during future earthquakes cannot be ruled out. We foresee that future, routine dynamic inversions will improve understanding of earthquake rupture parameters, an essential component of modern, physics-based earthquake hazard assessment.