Background Checkpoint proteins regulate the immune system and their down-regulation of effector mechanisms is exploited by malignant cells to evade antitumor immune response. Membrane bound programmed death 1 protein (PD-1) and its ligands 1 and 2 (PD-L1 and PD-L2) are pivotal members of the immune checkpoint family. The significance of the PD-1 pathway have been demonstrated in a variety of malignant diseases and suppressing the pathway with targeting antibodies can re-establish antitumor immunity. Soluble forms of the proteins (sPD-1, sPD-L1 and sPD-L2) are detectable in the peripheral blood, but their biological and clinical significance are still largely unknown. To our knowledge, this is the first study to simultaneously characterize sPD-1, sPD-L1 and sPD-L2 in different types of lymphoma. Aims The aim of the present study was to measure the pre-therapeutic sPD-1, sPD-L1 and sPD-L2 levels in different lymphoid malignancies and correlate them with clinico-pathological features and outcome. Methods We established and validated a Time Resolved Immunoflourometric assay (TRIFMA) to determine levels of sPD-1 and sPD-L2. Soluble PD-L1 levels were measured using a commercially available enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) applied according to manufacturer's instructions. In total, archival serum samples from 102 patients were analysed in duplicate for each protein. This single-institution study population consisted of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL; n=42), diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL; n=33), follicular lymphoma (FL; 15) and Hodgkin lymphoma (HL; n=12). In addition, 22 and 17 healthy controls were included for analysis of sPD-1/sPD-L1 and sPD-L2, respectively. Information on clinical parameters, response to treatment and outcome was obtained from medical records. Measured levels were compared between patient subgroups and controls using a non-parametric test (Mann-Whitney). P-values below 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Results Soluble PD-1 levels were higher in patients, taken as one group, compared to controls (p=0.0002). When analyzed according to lymphoma type, patients with DLBCL, CLL and FL still had significantly elevated sPD-1 levels as compared to controls (p=0.0089, p=0.0008 and p<0.0001, respectively). Highest sPD-1 levels were observed in FL and these were also significantly higher than in any of the other lymphoma subtypes analyzed. Soluble PD-L1 levels were similar in patients, taken as one group, and controls. Interestingly, patients with FL had lower sPD-L1 levels than patients from all the other lymphoma subtypes and it was the only histology whose sPD-L1 levels differed significantly (lower values) from healthy controls (p=0.0017, see table 1). Moreover, we identified a reverse expression pattern of sPD-1/sPD-L1 in FL as compared to other lymphoma subtypes, as FL had significantly higher sPD-1 and lower sPD-L1 than all other remaining patients (see table 1). Soluble PD-L2 levels were generally higher than those of sPD-1 and sPD-L1, and the highest values were found in healthy controls. When analyzed according to histological subtype, patients with CLL, DLBCL and FL had all significantly lower sPD-L2 levels than healthy controls (see table 1). Interestingly, the sPD-1, sPD-L1 and sPD-L2 levels measured in HL patients did not differ significantly from controls, however, this may be due to limited sample size. Conclusion We simultaneously characterized sPD-1, sPD-L1 and sPD-L2 in selected lymphomas subtypes and found varying levels across the investigated lymphoma entities. In particular, we identified a reverse expression pattern of sPD-1 and sPD-L1 in FL compared to other lymphoid malignancies. We were the first to also characterize sPD-L2 levels in the same patients and found its levels to be generally high throughout lymphoma entities, but highest in healthy controls. A correlation analysis with outcome-related parameters is ongoing. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.