Objective: To evaluate the diagnostic value of serum inflammation markers derived from complete blood count in diagnosis of prostate cancer (PCa). Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the data of 621 patients who underwent prostate biopsy between March 2013 and April 2018. Age, prostate specific antigen (PSA), free PSA, platelet count, neutrophil count, lymphocyte count, monocyte count, prostate volume (PV) and pathology result of the patients were recorded. Patients were grouped as benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), prostatitis and PCa. Patients were also grouped according to PSA values, as PSA < 4 , PSA 4-10 and PSA > 10 ng/dl. Results: The mean lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR) value of the patients with PCa was significantly lower in the entire cohort (p = 0.047). In the PSA 4-10 ng/dl range, LMR value wassignificantly lower in patients with PCa than those with BPH or prostatitis (p = 0.012). In this PSA range, free/total PSA ratio and LMR were significant factors to predict PCa. The cut-off values of LMR, free/total PSA were 3.05 and 0.15 respectively. The sensitivities, spesificities, positive predictive values (PPV) and negative predictive values using LMR cut-off, free/total PSA cut-off and their combination were assessed. Specificity and PPV of the combination group were higher (97.2%, 83.3% respectively) compared to free/total PSA cut-off group (91.6%, 76.6%) and LMR cut-off group (67.8%, 43.7%).Conclusions: LMR is a useful tool at detecting PCa especially in patients with PSA value between 4 and 10 ng/dl. The combination of free/total PSA ratio and LMR improves the diagnostic accuracy more than the use of free/total PSA ratio alone.

No abstract

To compare the efficacy of the middle calyx access (MCA) and lower calyx access (LCA) in the treatment of lower pole kidney stones. Materials and Methods: The data of patients with isolated lower pole kidney stones who underwent percutaneous nephrolithotomy via MCA or LCA between 2009 and 2019 were evaluated retrospectively. Pre-, peri-, and postoperative parameters of the groups (LCA group and MCA group) were compared. A value of p < 0.05 was considered significant. Results: A total of 601 patients with lower pole kidney stones were included in the study. LCA was performed for the initial tract in 400 patients, and MCA was performed in 201 patients. There were no significant differences in terms of age, gender, laterality, body mass index, previous operation history, stone burden, duration of fluoroscopy, and stone-free rate between the groups. Operation time was significantly longer in the LCA group (p = 0.041). In the LCA group, additional access was required in 50 cases, which was significantly higher than in the MCA group (p = 0.013). Clinically insignificant residual fragments (CIRF) were present in 28 patients (7%) in the first group (sig-nificantly higher vs. MCA: p = 0.044). There were no statistically significant differences in terms of overall complication and transfusion rates. Conclusions: MCA had superior outcomes in terms of operation time, CIRF rate, hemoglobin drop, and requirement of an additional tract compared to LCA. Further studies evaluating the efficacy of MCA in lower pole kidney stones should be performed to verify our results.