Background
The present study aimed to identify and critically appraise the quality of model-based economic evaluation studies in mental health prevention.
Methods
A systematic search was performed on MEDLINE, EMBASE, EconLit, PsycINFO, and Web of Science. Two reviewers independently screened for eligible records using predefined criteria and extracted data using a pre-piloted data extraction form. The 61-item Philips Checklist was used to critically appraise the studies. Systematic review registration number: CRD42020184519.
Results
Forty-nine studies were eligible to be included. Thirty studies (61.2%) were published in 2015–2021. Forty-seven studies were conducted for higher-income countries. There were mainly cost-utility analyses (n = 31) with the dominant primary outcome of quality-adjusted life year. The most common model was Markov (n = 26). Most of the studies were conducted from a societal or health care perspective (n = 37). Only ten models used a 50-year time horizon (n = 2) or lifetime horizon (n = 8). A wide range of mental health prevention strategies was evaluated with the dominance of selective/indicate strategy and focusing on common mental health problems (e.g., depression, suicide). The percentage of the Philip checkilst’s criteria fulfilled by included studies was 69.3% on average and ranged from 43.3 to 90%. Among three domains of the Philip checklist, criteria on the model structure were fulfilled the most (72.1% on average, ranging from 50.0% to 91.7%), followed by the data domain (69.5% on average, ranging from 28.9% to 94.0%) and the consistency domain (54.6% on average, ranging from 20.0% to 100%). The practice of identification of ‘relevant’ evidence to inform model structure and inputs was inadequately performed. The model validation practice was rarely reported.
Conclusions
There is an increasing number of model-based economic evaluations of mental health prevention available to decision-makers, but evidence has been limited to the higher-income countries and the short-term horizon. Despite a high level of heterogeneity in study scope and model structure among included studies, almost all mental health prevention interventions were either cost-saving or cost-effective. Future models should make efforts to conduct in the low-resource context setting, expand the time horizon, improve the evidence identification to inform model structure and inputs, and promote the practice of model validation.
Nano ZnO particle was synthesized by precipitation method using Zinc sulfate (ZnSO4.0.5H2O) as a precursor, and sodium hydroxide solution was used as a medium with and without the dispersant polyacrylamide. Various factors affecting the preparation such as pH, temperature, and crystallization time, were investigated. The nano ZnO particles were characterized by X-ray diffraction and SEM. It was found that nano ZnO particles with the size about 15 nm was successfully produced with high crystallinity and purity. The optimum conditions for nano ZnO preparation were pH 9, the temperature at 40oC, and crystallization time of 1 hour. The synthesized nano ZnO particle as an activator for sulfur vulcanization of rubber was studied. It showed that the synthesized nano ZnO has activated rubber vulcanization process faster and created more cross-linking.
This study reported preparation, characterizations and application of NiGaCo/MSO catalyst in conversion of CO2 to methanol under mild conditions. The catalyst was characterized by many techniques such as XRD, SEM, TEM, BET and XPS for confirming its structure and element characteristics of active site. The conversion was investigated on effects of many factors including temperature, pressure, feestock compostion to the process performance. The results showed that the NiGaCo/MSO catalyst was high activity and selectivity in the methanol synthesis where the application could be established at mild pressure (15 bar) and temperature (240oC) for a good methanol selectivity (87.8%) and overall yield (32.6%).
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.