Since 1977, routine cul‐de‐sac insufflation to achieve a pneumoperitoneum for laparoscopy was performed on 350 women under local anesthesia. A van Schie/van Lith intrauterine tenaculum, used together with a self‐retaining Trelat speculum, guaranteed maximum stretching of the posterior vaginal fault and fixation of the anteflexed uterus necessary for an accurate 1‐cm deep penetration of a pneumoperitoneum needle into the cul‐de‐sac. The correct position of the tip of the needle was determined precisely by means of two manometers. The failure rate in the first study of 195 procedures was 3.6% and that in the following 155 cases was 1.9%. There were no serious operative complications. The authors recommend the cul‐de‐sac insufflation approach for inducing pneumoperitoneum as the technique of choice.
No abstract
sound, light, and touch, have proved to be asymmetrical under certain c~nditions.')-~r Correlation has been found to exist between the initial head-turning responses of infants two days post-partum and maternal holding preference two to three weeks later.16 This could mean that right-holding is appropriate in normal newborns showing left-side preference in their behavioural reactions. In sick, premature, and/or separated newborns this could be a sign of disturbed neonatal behaviour, as the percentage of asymmetrical responses to stimuli increases. Maternal and paternal handedness has been shown to have no influence on side preference for holding newborns.1.3.sJ1 Whether the holder's handedness fits in with the infant's asymmetrical behaviour and is indirectly correlated with side preference, is currently under investigation in our unit. ReferencesI SALK L: The effects of the normal heartbeat sound on the behaviour of the newborn infant. Implications for mental health. World Ment Health 1 2 : 168, 1g60 2 WEILAND JH: Heartbeat rhythm and maternal behaviour. J Am Acid Child Psychiatr 3 : 161, 1964 3 DE CHATEAU P. HOLMBERG H. WINBERG J: Left-side preference in holding and carrying newborn infants. 1. Mothers holding and carrying during the first week of life. Acta Paediatr Scand 67: 169, 1978 4 DE CHATEAU P. ANDERSON s: Left-side preference in holding and carrying newborn infants. 11. l+ll-holding and carrying from 2 to 16 years. DevMed Child Neurol 1 8 : 738, 1976 5 DE CHATEAU P, DELLERUD I. MEZAN s et al: Left-side preference in holding and carrying newborn infants. IV. Fathers holding and carrying during the first week of life. Manuscript 6 SALK L: The critical nature of the post-partum period in the human for the establishment of the mother-infant bond: a controlled study. Dis Nerv Syst, Supp I I : I 1 0 , I970 haviour one year after delivery and extended postpartum contact. Dev Med Child Neurol16: 172, 1974 8 KLAUS MH, KENNELL JH: Mothers separated from their newborn infants. Pediatr Clin North Am 17: 1 0 1 5 , I970 g NILSSON A: Paranatd emotiond adjustment. Acta Psychiatr Scand, Suppl: 2 2 0 , 1970 10 KAPLAN D. MASON E: Maternal reactions to premature birth viewed as an acute emotional disorder. Am J Orthopsychiatty 30: 539, 1g60 I I DE CHATEAU P , WIBERG B: Long-term effects on motherinfant behaviour of extra contact during the first hour post-partum. 111. Follow-up at one year. Early Hum Dev: in press 1 2 WEILAND I H . SPERBER z: Patterns of mother-infant contact. The significance of lateral preference. J Gen Psy-chol117: 157, 1970 13 MIRANDA SB: Visual abilities and pattern preferences of premature infants and full-term infants. J Erp Child Psychol 1 0 : 189. 1970 14 TURKEWITZ G , MOREAU 1. DAVIS L et al: Factors affecting lateral differentiation in the human newborn. J E r p Child Psychol 8 : 483, 1969 15 TURNER s. MACFARLANE A: Localisation of human speech by the newborn baby and the effects of pethidine (Merepidine). D e v Med Child Neurol 2 0 : 727, 7 KENNELL JH, JERAULD R. WOLFE H et d: Maternal be-I978...
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.