OBJECTIVE -To determine the effect of lowering the fasting plasma glucose (FPG) criterion for impaired fasting glucose (IFG) on the prevalence of IFG, the risks of diabetes, and cardiovascular disease (CVD) associated with IFG. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS-Three studies were used: 1) the 1998 National Health Survey (NHS98), a randomly selected cross-sectional sample of 4,723 subjects; 2) the Singapore Impaired Glucose Tolerance (IGT) Follow-up Study, a cohort study comprising 295 IGT and 292 normal glucose tolerance subjects (frequency matched for age, sex, and ethnic group) followed up from 1992 to 2000; and 3) the Singapore CVD Cohort Study, comprising 5,920 subjects from three cross-sectional studies in whom the first ischemic heart disease (IHD) event was identified through linkage to registry databases. Risk of diabetes (Singapore IGT Follow-up study) was estimated using logistic regression adjusted for age, sex, and ethnicity. Risk of IHD (Singapore CVD cohort) was estimated using stratified (by study, from which data were derived) Cox's proportional hazards models adjusted for age, sex, and ethnicity.RESULTS -Lowering the criterion for diagnosing IFG to 5.6 mmol/l increased the prevalence of IFG from 9.5 to 32.3% in the NHS98. The lower cutoff identified more subjects at risk of diabetes and IHD, but the relative risk was lower than that for IGT.CONCLUSIONS -Greater efforts to identify those with IGT, or a group at similar risk of diabetes and CVD, may be a more efficient public health measure than lowering the FPG criterion for diagnosing IFG. Diabetes Care 27:1728 -1734, 2004T he American Diabetes Association had previously recommended (1) the recognition of impaired fasting glucose (IFG) as a category of glucose tolerance analogous to impaired glucose tolerance (IGT). It was recommended that IFG be diagnosed in those with fasting plasma glucose (FPG) between 6.1 and 6.9 mmol/l. Since then, many analyses have examined the equivalence of FPG and 2-h postchallenge glucose (2-h PG) in predicting both diabetes and cardiovascular disease (CVD). Several key findings have emerged from these studies. First, the association between IGT and CVD events and mortality is stronger than that for IFG (2,3). Second, although IFG and IGT identify some of the same individuals, the degree of overlap is variable (4,5). As a consequence of the recommendations to use FPG rather than 2-h PG for the diagnosis of diabetes, many subjects with IGT, who are at risk of future CVD events, would not be identified.On the basis of the aforementioned findings, the American Diabetes Association has recently recommended (6) that the lower limit for the diagnosis of IFG be changed from 6.1 to 5.6 mmol/l. However, the need for this change has been questioned by others (7,8). Singapore is a small country in Asia with a high prevalence of diabetes and IGT. As in Europe and the U.S., we have found that IFG and IGT often identify different individuals. Only 26% of subjects with IGT had IFG (as defined by the older criteria of FPG 6.1-6.9 mmol/l),...
Chinese adoptees have more complex presentations and delayed surgical care compared to their domestic counterparts. Engaging prospective families starting before adoption helps to manage expectations. Long-range planning, timely surgery, aggressive therapy, and close careful follow-up can mitigate some of these differences. Speech and language problems including articulation disorders, expressive delays, and hypernasality are frequent and can persist despite interventions.
The inclusion of a cleft team social worker is a critical component of comprehensive cleft team care as evidenced by the large proportion of families who required assistance. Ongoing social work assessments are recommended for each patient to help address the variety of psychosocial stressors families face.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.