A sub-surface desert water harvester was constructed in the sagebrush steppe habitat of south-central Idaho, U.S.A. The desert water harvester utilizes a buried micro-catchment and three buried storage tanks to augment water for wildlife during the dry season. In this region, mean annual precipitation (MAP) ranges between about 150-250 mm (6"-10"), 70% of which falls during the cold season, November to May. Mid-summer through early autumn, June through October, is the dry portion of the year. During this period, the sub-surface water harvester provides supplemental water for wildlife for 30-90 days, depending upon the precipitation that year. The desert water harvester is constructed with commonly available, "over the counter" materials. The micro-catchment is made of a square-shaped, 20 mL. "PERMALON" polyethylene pond liner (approximately 22.9 m x 22.9 m = 523 m2) buried at a depth of about 60 cm. A PVC pipe connects the harvester with two storage tanks and a drinking trough. The total capacity of the water harvester is about 4777 L (1262 U.S. gallons) which includes three underground storage tanks, a trough and pipes. The drinking trough is refined with an access ramp for birds and small animals. The technology is simple, cheap, and durable and can be adapted to other uses, e.g. drip irrigation, short-term water for small livestock, poultry farming etc. The desert water harvester can be used to concentrate and collect water from precipitation and run-off in semi-arid and arid regions. Water harvested in such a relatively small area will not impact the ground water table but it should help to grow small areas of crops or vegetables to aid villagers in self-sufficiency.

This paper presents a description of some methods of collecting data on the performance of ceramic kilns and an explanation of the formulae used in calculating heat accounts from the data. It is hoped that these methods may serve as a foundation for the formulation of a code for testing kilns in order that the efficiency of new kilns can be determined on a comparative basis.

No abstract

No abstract

The fundamental laws of gas flow are applied to the movement of gases through down-draft kilns. Data on pressure conditions in four kilns are presented graphically. The cause of draft, the superiority of the down-draft over the up-draft kiln, the significance of stack draft, the relation of draft and excess air, features of kiln design, and the comparative merits of forced, induced and natural draft are discussed. Presented