No abstract

Identification of nuclear receptor-mediated endocrine activities is important in a variety of fields, ranging from pharmacological and clinical screening, to food and feed safety, toxicological monitoring, and risk assessment. Traditionally animal studies such as the Hershberger and Allen-Doisy tests are used for the assessment of androgenic and estrogenic potencies, respectively. To allow fast analysis of the activities of new chemicals, food additives, and pharmaceutical compounds, high-throughput screening strategies have been developed. Here, a panel of mainly steroidal compounds, screened in different in vitro assays, was compared with two human U2-OS cell line-based CALUX (Chemically Activated LUciferase eXpression) reporter gene assays for androgens (AR CALUX) and estrogens (ERalpha CALUX). Correlations found between the data of these two CALUX reporter gene assays and data obtained with other in vitro screening assays measuring receptor binding or reporter gene activation (CHO cell line-based) were good (correlation coefficients (r2) between 0.54 and 0.76; p < 0.0001). Good correlations were also found between the in vitro and in vivo data (correlation coefficient r2 = 0.46 for the AR CALUX vs. Hershberger assay and r2 = 0.87 for the ERalpha CALUX vs. Allen-Doisy assay). The variations in the results obtained with the reporter gene assays (CALUX vs. CHO cell line based) were relatively small, showing the robustness of these types of assays. Using hierarchical clustering, bioactivity relationships between compounds but also relationships between various bioassays were determined. The in vitro assays were found to be good predictors of in vivo androgenic or estrogenic activity of a range of compounds, allowing prescreen and/or possible reduction of animal studies.

The HepG2 cell line is a valuable tool for screening for cytotoxicity in the early phase of pharmaceutical development. Some compounds which produce reactive and toxic metabolites, are classified as being toxic in HepG2 cells. In contrast, other compounds, which are toxic in primary human hepatocytes, are not toxic in HepG2 cells. A difference in metabolism between HepG2 cells and primary human hepatocytes might be the reason. To investigate this, cytochrome P450 and Phase II enzyme levels were characterized. In the present study the focus is on Phase II enzyme metabolism. Transcript levels of UDP-glucuronosyl transferases (UGTs), sulfotransferases (SULTs), glutathione S-transferases (GSTs), N-acetyltransferase-1 (NAT1) and epoxide hydrolase (EPHX1) were measured with quantitative PCR in HepG2 cells and cryopreserved primary human hepatocytes. Levels of SULT1A1, 1A2, 1E1, 1A2, and 2A1, microsomal GST 1, GST mu1, NAT1, and EPHX1 in HepG2 cells were almost similar to levels in primary human hepatocytes. In contrast, levels of UGT1A1 and 1A6 transcripts were between 10- and more than 1000-fold higher in the primary hepatocytes. The regulatory processes of Phase II enzymes by the aryl hydrocarbon receptor, pregnane X receptor and constitutive androstane receptor were studied in HepG2 cells and appeared quite similar to those in primary human hepatocytes. Due to the involvement of Phase II enzymes in the toxication of some compounds, HepG2 cells can be a valuable cellular system to predict toxicity for these compounds. On the other hand, the normal expression of most Phase II enzymes in combination with the lower expression of cytochrome P450 enzymes in HepG2 cells might result in an underestimation of toxicity for several compounds. Compared to primary human hepatocytes, HepG2 cells are a relatively easy-to-handle tool to study the up-regulation of Phase II enzymes.

No abstract

No abstract