Introduction Peyronie’s Disease (PD) is a debilitating condition characterized by progressive scarring of the tunica albuginea. The resulting deformities are often emotionally devastating to patients, and include erectile dysfunction, painful erections, penile curvature, indentation, hourglass, and hinge deformities. According to previously published surgical algorithm for PD in 1997, partial plaque excision and grafting (PEG) is recommended for patients with >60 degree curvature +/− hinge and strong pre-operative erections while placement of an inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) is recommended when rigidity is sub-optimal.* Nevertheless, many patients counseled to undergo an IPP refuse and insist on proceeding with PEG due to personal preference. We hypothesize that men counseled to undergo IPP but choose to undergo PEG will report lower satisfaction rates and reduced ability to engage in sexual intercourse post-operatively. Objective Our objective was to evaluate and compare long-term patient-reported outcomes in men who underwent PEG at a single institution between 2007 and 2021. Methods A retrospective chart review was conducted from 2007 to 2021 on PEG surgeries performed at a single, tertiary-care institution in patients ≥18 years old who had >3 months of follow up. Results 251 patients underwent PEG with a mean follow up was 35.5 months. 54 patients (22%) were initially advised to undergo IPP but elected for PEG. Of these 54 patients, 17 (32%) had pre-operative 9-10 subjective erectile rigidity, relative to 110 of 197 (56%) patients who were initially counseled to undergo PEG (p=0.002). On duplex penile ultrasound, patients counseled to undergo IPP had a mean objective erectile rigidity of 7.8, compared to a mean objective rigidity of 8.6 in patients initially counseled to undergo PEG (p 15 units for pre-operative duplex ultrasound evaluation were less likely to be able to engage in post-operative intercourse following PEG surgery (48.6%) relative to those who needed <15 units (71.1%) (p=0.02). Conclusions Patients who were initially counseled to undergo IPP due to sub-optimal erectile rigidity but elected for PEG procedure had worse post-operative ability to engage in penetrative intercourse. Significantly more of these patients also eventually underwent IPP. Pre-operative trimix dosing <15U is a predictor of post-operative erectile function as it may be reflective of better pre-operative erectile quality. Subjective and objective measures of erectile function appear to be critical predictors of post-operative erectile function in patients who had underwent PEG, confirming the previously published 1997 algorithm on the surgical management of PD.* *J Urol 1997; 158: 2149-52. Disclosure Any of the authors act as a consultant, employee or shareholder of an industry for: Boston Scientific (Consultant)

Introduction Placement of an inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) is a common surgical treatment of multiple disorders of male sexual function, including erectile dysfunction (ED) and Peyronie's disease (PD). The infra-pubic and peno-scrotal approaches have classically been favored for IPP placement since the first description of IPP placement in 1973 given reliably good outcomes. A sub-coronal incision was then described in 2016 for the implantation of a multicomponent IPP. The benefits of a sub-coronal approach to IPP placement includes exposure and access to the entire pendulous penis back to the mid bulb to allow for additional reconstructive procedures, such as plaque incision and grafting for Peyronie's disease, which previously would require an additional incision. Objective Although the sub-coronal approach has been described to be operatively feasible with advantageous operating times, the aim of this project is to report outcomes of the sub-coronal approach, such as patient satisfaction, rate of revision, infection, and wound complications. Methods A retrospective chart review from 5/11/2012 to 12/28/2020 was conducted on IPP placements performed at a single, tertiary-care institution to identify patients with IPPs placed via a sub-coronal approach. Data was collected at most recent follow-up date to determine outcomes measures such as satisfaction and complication rates. Results Forty-six patients had IPPs placed through a sub-coronal incision. Mean time to follow-up was 9.81 months (0.46-45.6 months). Of these patients, 22 (47.8%) explicitly expressed satisfaction with the procedure at follow-up. Four (8.7%) had wound complications. Additionally, only one (2.2%) experienced a post-operative prosthetic infection. Revision was performed in 3 IPPs (6.5%). One revision was performed to primarily release prothesis tubing that had become adherent to the left base of penile shaft, which was causing patient discomfort. The same revision served additional cosmetic purpose to reduce redundant skin along the patient's circumcision line. The other two revisions were performed for prosthesis malfunctions: one prosthesis acquired “buckling” leading to a ventral curvature requiring release of scar contraction, and the other prosthesis developed a proximal aneurysm requiring removal and replacement. Conclusions The sub-coronal approach for placement of an IPP is a promising alternative to the infra-pubic and peno-scrotal incisions with high patient satisfaction, low complication, and low revision rates. Disclosure Any of the authors act as a consultant, employee or shareholder of an industry for: Boston Scientific and Coloplast

Introduction Peyronie’s disease (PD) is a progressive wound-healing disorder resulting in plaque formation within the tunica albuginea. PD continues to be poorly understood and an area of investigation, with increased awareness by patients and clinicians. Most commonly, PD patients will have a singular plaque and uniplanar curvature in the dorsal or lateral direction. However, previous studies have categorized less common deformities as “atypical”, which includes ventral curvature, multiplanar curvatures, unilateral indentations, hourglass deformity, and severe loss of penile length. Objective We aim to characterize the presenting features of PD within a large cohort of patients presenting to a tertiary referral center. Furthermore, we seek to elucidate the pre-operative factors that correlate with subsequent surgical intervention. Methods 1483 consecutive patients presenting with PD from 2016 to 2021 were retrospectively identified. Patients were excluded if they only had virtual visits, refused penile duplex evaluation, or had PD surgical correction prior to presentation. Baseline demographics, prior treatments, physical exam findings, penile duplex assessment (PDDU), subsequent interventions, and clinical outcomes were documented. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to assess pre-operative predictors of subsequent surgical intervention. Results In total, 1263 patients met inclusion criteria. Mean age at presentation was 55.4 ± 11.1 years with a mean duration of PD at presentation of 33.2 ± 42.5 months. Mean primary curvature was 49.8 ± 20.8°. Primary ventral curvature was present in 11.4% and 36.5% of patients had a multiplanar curvature. Mean composite curvature was 60.4 ± 28.2°. Subjective penile shortening was reported by 64.8% of patients with a mean reported loss of 3.8 ± 2.1 cm. During PDDU, indentation/narrowing deformities was appreciated in 73.7%, hourglass deformity in 10.1%, and hinge effect in 33.0% of patients. Calcification was seen in 30.1% of patients. Operative intervention occurred in 35.3% of patients. Hypogonadism (1.56 OR, p=0.04), severity of primary curvature (1.03 OR, p<0.001), hourglass deformity (1.82 OR, p=0.01), decreased tunical elasticity (1.20 OR, p=0.03), and prior intralesional Xiaflex injections (2.94 OR, p <0.001) predicted subsequent surgical correction. Negative predictors of surgical intervention included use of any oral PD treatment (0.43 OR, <0.001) and ability to perform penetrative sex (0.72 OR, p=0.04). 446 (35.3%) patients underwent surgical intervention with 170 (38.1%) plaque incision/excision and grafting, 110 (24.7%) tunical plication, and 166 (37.2%) inflatable penile prosthesis cases. Conclusions Peyronie’s disease remains an incompletely understood disease and presenting features may be changing as a result of more sophisticated evaluation and physician experience. Ventral curvature, multiplanar curvatures, indentation deformity, hourglass deformity, and severe loss of penile length have been described as “atypical”, but these changes are not rare in our cohort of referred patients. Patients with worse erectile function and more severe PD characteristics were predictors of surgical intervention. Disclosure Any of the authors act as a consultant, employee or shareholder of an industry for: Boston Scientific.