SUMMARYBackground: Mode of death in chronic heart failure (CHF) may be of relevance to choice of therapy for this condition. Sudden death is particularly common in patients with early and/or mild/moderate CHF. β-Blockade may provide better protection against sudden death than ACE inhibition (ACEI) in this setting. Methods: We randomized 1010 patients with mild or moderate, stable CHF and left ventricular ejection fraction ≤35%, without ACEI, β-blocker or angiotensin-receptor-blocker therapy, to either bisoprolol (n = 505) or enalapril (n = 505) for 6 months, followed by their combination for 6-24 months. The two strategies were blindly compared regarding adjudicated mode of death, including sudden death and progressive pump failure death. Results: During the monotherapy phase, 8 of 23 deaths in the bisoprolol-first group were sudden, compared to 16 of 32 in the enalapril-first group: hazard ratio (HR) for sudden death 0.50; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.21-1.16; P = 0.107. At 1 year, 16 of 42 versus 29 of 60 deaths were sudden: HR 0.54; 95% CI 0.29-1.00; P = 0.049. At study end, 29 of 65 versus 34 of 73 deaths were sudden: HR 0.84; 95% CI 0.51-1.38; P = 0.487. Comparable figures for pump failure death were: monotherapy, 7 of 23 deaths versus 2 of 32: HR 3.43; 95% CI 0.71-16.53; P = 0.124, at 1 year, 13 of 42 versus 5 of 60: HR 2.57; 95% CI 0.92-7.20; P = 0.073, at study end, 17 of 65 versus 7 of 73: HR 2.39; 95% CI 0.99-5.75; P = 0.053. There were no significant between-group differences in any other fatal events. Conclusion: Initiating therapy with bisoprolol compared to enalapril decreased the risk of sudden death during the first year in this mild systolic CHF cohort. This was somewhat offset by an increase in pump failure deaths in the bisoprolol-first cohort.

Background: HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) are widely prescribed in patients with established systolic chronic heart failure (CHF). However, there is considerable controversy regarding their benefit in this setting. We therefore conducted a post-hoc analysis of outcomes according to statin use within the Second Cardiac Insufficiency Bisoprolol Study of the beta-blocker, bisoprolol, in NYHA classes III–IV systolic CHF patients (left ventricular ejection fraction <35%), eceiving background ACE inhibitor and diuretics. Methods: Analysis of clinical outcomes was performed according to baseline use of statins and subsequent randomisation to placebo or bisoprolol. Cumulative incidence curves for clinical events were constructed using the Kaplan-Meier method and tested for significance by log-rank statistic. Multivariate analysis was performed using the Cox proportional hazards regression model. Results: Two hundred and twenty-six of 2,647 patients were receiving statins at baseline (8.5%). Patients were well-matched in the 4 study groups at baseline for gender, weight, NYHA class and LVEF, however statin/bisoprolol patients were significantly younger (p < 0.05). Statin use at baseline was associated with a significant survival benefit compared with no statin use (p < 0.005, hazard ratio [HR] = 0.60, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.39–0.94). This benefit remained after adjusting for other significant predictors of survival (p < 0.05, HR = 0.60, 95%CI = 0.39–0.94). A significant interaction effect was noted with bisoprolol, survival being greatest in the statin/bisoprolol group (p < 0.001, HR = 0.14, 95% CI = 0.03–0.60). Survival was 98.3% in the statin/bisoprolol group, 82.1% in the statin/placebo group, 87.2% in the no statin/bisoprolol group and 82.8% in the no statin/placebo group. The statin/bisoprolol group was also associated with fewer cardiovascular (p < 0.005) and sudden deaths (p < 0.0005) compared with other groups. Conclusions: Despite the post-hoc, non-randomised nature of this analysis, these observations suggest that statin use appears to be beneficial in CHF. Furthermore, there appears to be a favourable interaction between statins and beta-blockade within the Second Cardiac Insufficiency Bisoprolol Study cohort. Prospective studies of statins are required to definitively address the role of these agents in established CHF.

No abstract

The pharmacokinetic properties and first clinical experiences with the antihypertensive dopamine (DA2) agonist, carmoxirole, are summarized. In man carmoxirole was rapidly absorbed. On oral administration the maximum plasma concentration was reached after 2-3 h. The drug was metabolized, mainly to an ester-type glucuronide, and was excreted (unchanged carmoxirole plus glucuronide) largely by the kidneys. The plasma half-life of the parent compound was 5.5 h. For the dose range tested (0.5 to 1.5 mg) the pharmacokinetics were linear. The drug was rapidly distributed in animals but only very small amounts penetrated the blood-brain barrier. Carmoxirole did not affect supine blood pressure in healthy subjects, but under the conditions of the Schellong's test some orthostatic reactions occurred with high doses. In patients the blood pressure was reduced for at least 8 h after single oral doses. On repeated administration for several weeks a relevant antihypertensive effect was still measurable 12 and 24 h after dose. The most frequently reported adverse events have been headache, dizziness, tiredness, nausea, and gastric disorders. These symptoms are considered to be mainly due to blood pressure reduction, as is frequently observed at the beginning of antihypertensive therapy. In patients the incidence of orthostatic reactions is appreciably lower than in healthy subjects, and in both change of position was sufficient to relieve the symptoms.

No abstract