Gastric antisecretory phenothiazine LM24056 inhibited acid and pepsin responses to feeding in dogs. Administered perorally two hours before feeding, LM24056 reduced significantly the secretory responses to combinations of feeding either with antramine, a natural histamine derivate, or with synthetic histamine. LM 24056 reduced circulating gastrin levels (p < 0.01 and p < 0.001) and gastrin responses to feeding (p < 0.01) without modifying neither circulating histamine concentrations nor histamine responses to feeding. The residual acid and pepsin secretions were closely related to gastrin reduction and endogenous or exogenous histamine, by themselves, seemed to be unable to recover the levels of secretory responses observed in response to feeding alone or in combination with antramine or histamine. These data favour a new scheme of gastric secretion regulation where gastrin would be the last step for stimulating parietal and chief cells. LM24056 by reducing circulating gastrin prevents stimulatory effect of exogenous or feeding-released endogenous histamine. Histamine would not be thus the final common mediator for gastric secretion.
Measurements of acid and pepsin secretions and of histamine release in response to food alone or in combination with graded doses of antramine (AH), a molecular form of histamine isolated from antral mucosa, with or without somatostatin were performed simultaneously in dogs equipped with a denervated pouch. AH restored somatostatin-inhibited acid and pepsin secretions but with different intensities in regard to the different inhibitory levels induced by somatostatin. AH competitively antagonized somatostatin (1 microgram/kg/h) inhibition of acid secretion, but when stronger levels of inhibition were achieved, AH restored weakly acid secretion. Recovery of pepsin secretion occurred through a competitive mechanism between AH and somatostatin (1 and 2 micrograms/kg/h). There was a close relationship between the secretory outputs and the integrated histamine responses; the slopes of the regression lines might be considered as reflecting the stimulatory activity of blood histamine on secreting cells. For acid secretion, this activity is similar in control and somatostatin (1 microgram/kg/h) tests, while for pepsin secretion it is identical in control and 1 or 2 micrograms/kg/h somatostatin tests. One can speculate that the suppression of the somatostatin inhibitory effects by antramine, within the limits of physiological conditions, results from a competitive mechanism.
We assessed the effects of pirenzepine (2 mg/kg per os) on gastric secretion and gastrin and histamine release in response to food and histamine dihydrochloride infusion in four dogs during 24 weeks of treatment and for 15 weeks after the end of treatment. The results were compared to those obtained in the same animals in control experiments, before treatment, and in four untreated dogs. Pirenzepine absorption was checked by measuring plasma concentrations. Pirenzepine led to a significant reduction in acid and pepsin secretion in response to histamine. In response to food, the reduction in secretion was concomitant with a reduction in gastrin and histamine release. Baseline concentrations of gastrin were reduced, while those of histamine were unchanged. No side effects were observed. After treatment, a long time lapse (about 15 weeks) was required for acid and pepsin secretion and gastrinemia to return to control levels, while histamine release in response to food normalized rapidly. Pirenzepine fixes selectively to M1 muscarinic receptors of the synaptic ganglion, thus inhibiting the effect of vagal stimulation, especially on pepsin secretion. Our data suggest that it might also fix to M1 receptors located on ECL cells, thereby reducing histamine release. In addition, pirenzepine probably fixes to other muscarinic receptors inhibiting gastrin release and resulting in a G and secretory cell mass reduction, probably by increasing somatostatin release.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.