Background Assessing fluid responsiveness is the key to successful resuscitation of critically-ill sepsis patients. The use of IVC variation is favored among the dynamic methods of fluid responsiveness assessment in the ICU because it is non-invasive and inexpensive; moreover, it does not demand a high level of training. The aim of this study is to determine the value of the IVC respiratory variability for predicting fluid responsiveness in spontaneously breathing sepsis patients with acute circulatory failure. Results In this prospective observational study, fifty-eight spontaneously breathing sepsis patients admitted in the ICU were enrolled after the approval of the departmental Research Ethical Committee, and the informed written consent had been taken from the patients. Ultrasonographic and echocardiographic parameters were measured “IVC parameters and stroke volume (SV)” with calculation of the inferior vena cava collapsibility index (IVCCI) and cardiac output. These values were obtained before (baseline) and after volume expansion with a fluid bolus. The study showed that twenty-nine patients (50%) were considered to be responders, with an increase in CO by 10% or more after fluid challenge. There was a significant difference between responders and non-responders in baseline IVCCI (p value < 0.001). There were no significant differences between responders and non-responders in terms of demographic and baseline clinical characteristics. Also, there was statistically significantly larger maximum (IVC max) and minimum (IVC min) inferior vena cava diameters before volume expansion in non-responders than in responders with p value 0.037 and 0.001 respectively. The suggested cut off value regarding baseline IVCCI to predict response to fluid infusion is 0.32 with a high chance of response above this figure (a sensitivity of 72.41% and a specificity of 82.76%). Conclusions Inferior vena cava collapsibility index assessment can be a sensitive and a good predictor of fluid responsiveness, being based on a safe and a non-invasive technique compared to other methods such as central venous pressure (CVP) measurement and pulmonary artery catheter insertion.
Purpose To compare between lung ultrasound and chest X-ray in diagnosis of different lung pathologies in critically ill patients using lung CT as a gold standard. Methods Comparative prospective randomized single group observational study was conducted in the Critical Care unit (medical and surgical ICU). The study was conducted upon fifty patients (28 females &22 males) with a mean age of 58 years (SD ± 15.55; (19 - 82) presented to Kom Hamadah Hospital during a period of one year starting from July 2018 to July 2019, with acute dyspnea as the primary complaint or developed acute dyspnea and or tachypnea during their ICU stay were evaluated for the presence of pleural effusion, pneumothorax, alveolar-Interstitial Pathology and consolidation by LUS and CXR for detecting the sensitivity and specificity of each modality with CT chest done as a reference in cases of doubt. Results The comparison between Sensitivity and Specificity of US finding was (86.8% for parenchymal disease, 100.0% for pleural diseases) and (100.0% for parenchymal diseases, 94.7% for pleural diseases) respectively while CXR finding was (65.8% for parenchymal diseases, 75.0% for pleural diseases) and (58.3% for parenchymal diseases), (92.1% for pleural diseases) respectively among studied patients. Conclusion Transthoracic ultrasound is valuable for the evaluation of a wide variety of chest diseases, particularly mechanically ventilated patient. The advantages of low cost, bedside availability and no radiation exposure have made ultrasound an indispensable diagnostic tool in ICU. Lung ultrasound is more sensitive than chest x-ray in diagnosis and follow up chest diseases) PNX, alveolar-interstitial syndromes, parenchymal consolidations, and pleural effusion (LUS is an interesting medical method that is complementary to bedside CXR and reduces the need to use a CT scan.
Background Brachial plexus is a network of nerves that arises from the neck passing through the axilla to supply the whole upper limb with motor and sensory supply. Our target in upper limb surgeries is to block this plexus using local anesthetics. Different adjuvants have been mixed with local anesthetics (LAs) for peripheral nerve blocks (PNBs). These drugs usually affect may delay the onset of action and prolong the duration of analgesia. Objective The aim of the present study was to compare the effect of Magnesium with bupivacine vesus bupivacine alone in supraclavicular nerve block ultrasound guided in upper limb surgeries Patients and Methods In our study 82 patients are randomly divide into two equal groups, control group received only bupivacine 0.5 % and magnesium group received 250 mg in addition to bupivacine 0.5% Results Our study showed that addition of 150 mg of magnesium to bupivacine in ultra sound guided supraclavicular block prolong the onset time of both sensory and motor block (p value >0.05) non significant. But it significantly prolonged their duration, p value <0.05 for sensory block and <0.001 for motor block which was highly significant Conclusion Addition of magnesium also did not affect the hemodynamics as regard systolic, diastolic blood pressure and o2 saturation. The previous findings proved that adding magnesium to bupivacine is more superior than the use of bupivacine alone.
Background: Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block is atechnique of regional anesthesia, which reduces the pain derived from abdominal wall incisions, decreases general anesthesia requirements, and increases hemodynamic stability. Hyaluronidase is an enzyme considered as the "spreading factor", facilitating the spread of local anesthetic solutions. It has been shown to produce reliable blockade with better spread and therefore better quality of block when used with local anesthetics.
Background during critical illness, changes in circulating hormonal levels are a common phenomenon. These alterations are correlated with the severity and outcome of patients in intensive care unit (ICU). Thyroid hormone stays a key role in the maintenance of the body growth. Modulating metabolism and the immune system. Aim of the Work is to access the relation between thyroid dysfunction and mortality in critically ill patients and to access the strength of thyroid dysfunction as a predictor of mortality against APACHE II score and CRP, also to assess the additive effect of low FT3 and high APACHE II score as a predictor of mortality. Patients and Methods the study population (n = 40) included 21 males (52.2%) and 19 females (47.5). their age range from (21 years) to (91 years) were selected from critically ill patients admitted to El Demerdash hospital general ICU in the period from March 2017 to March 2018. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to 7th day thyroid profile: Group 1 Normal thyroid function group (24 patients). Group 2 thyroid dysfunction group (16 patients). Results the most significant abnormality between the 2 groups was TT3 and FT3. The patients in thyroid dysfunction group showed significantly higher APACHE II score and CRP but lower GCS. They also needed more mechanical ventilation with longer duration. There was no significant difference between the 2 study groups as regard cardiovascular complication. Conclusion our study also showed highly significant correlation between thyroid dysfunction and mortality. FT3 appeared to be better predictor of mortality among critically ill patients with AUC 83% and p value < 0.001 with sensitivity 99% and specificity 61%. The predictive value of FT3 for mortality increased by the addition of APACHE II score > 25.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.