Background:
Cranioplasty is a commonly performed neurosurgical procedure used to repair defects of the cranial vault. For large defects, 3D printing allows for the creation of patient-specific synthetic cranioplasties. Although these implants provide excellent cosmetic results for patients, costs are quite high. This makes their routine use challenging in the current Canadian healthcare environment. The purpose of this study is to report our experience with a novel, cost-effective method for cranioplasty using desktop 3D printers to manufacture patient-specific molds to aid in the shaping of polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) cranioplasty intraoperatively.
Methods:
A retrospective review of patients who underwent cranioplasty utilizing 3D printed custom molds was conducted at a single center between 2018 and 2020. Either a two-piece self-align or open-air mold was utilized. Material cost, as well as demographic, clinical, and radiologic data, was reviewed. A five-point ordinance scale was used to evaluate patient satisfaction with cosmesis.
Results:
Four patients had previous craniectomies with infected bone flaps, 2 patients had significant bony destruction from tumor invasion, and 1 patient had bone flap resorption. Three patients underwent an open-air mold technique with a Ti-mesh/PMMA-combined implant. The remaining 4 patients underwent two-piece mold with PMMA-only implant. All patients had ‘Good’ to ‘Excellent’ cosmetic outcome with one post-operative acute subdural hematoma and one post-operative infection. Two-piece mold resulted in improved cosmetic outcome and cost savings.
Conclusions:
3D printing can be used in a cost-effective manner to deliver good cranioplasty cosmesis. Wider adoption of this technique can result in significant healthcare cost savings without compromising patient outcome.
Background: Cranial reconstruction is a common
consequence of neurosurgical disease and intervention following craniectomy,
trauma, infection, congenital defects, or neoplasm. Most commonly, Computer
Aided Design-Computer Aided Manufacturing (CAD-CAM) technology is utilized
in cases where autologous bone cannot be used. These patient-specific
implants provide excellent cosmesis, however individual costs range from
$800-15,000, making routine use challenging in the current Canadian health
care environment. Here we present a novel method using desktop 3D printers
to manufacture patient-specific molds for intraoperative reconstruction of
various cranial defects. Methods: Our first patient
presented following two separate traumas requiring decompressive craniectomy
and subsequent posterior fossa decompression without interval cranioplasty.
The second patient required reconstruction during resection of intraosseous
meningioma. Both cases were performed using a
titanium-mesh/poly-methyl-methacrylate (Ti-PMMA) construct draped over the
mold. The third case, cranioplasty following decompressive craniectomy
outside the country, was performed using a “two piece” mold and PMMA was
casted into the mold and allowed to harden. Results:
Patients reported satisfaction with cosmesis, without adverse outcomes. Cost
per case was $50-100, representing an estimated cost savings of $685,000 per
year in Canada. Conclusions: Given excellent outcomes
in addition to cost effectiveness, this case series provides evidence for
use of this alternate technique with similar patient outcomes.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.