BackgroundBreast cancer represented 35.1 % of total female cancer cases in Egypt. Seroma is one of the most serious and common complications of mastectomy and axillary dissection with incidence between 15 and 81 %. Seroma formation delays wound healing and increases susceptibility to infection, skin flap necrosis, and persistent pain as well as prolonging convalescence. Therefore, several techniques have been investigated to minimize seroma formation with no consistent success. Axillary exclusion is a technique aimed to obliterate dead space after axillary clearance and minimize collection.MethodsSixty-four patients were prepared for modified radical mastectomy. Of those, the study group contains 32 patients and the control group contains 32 patients. Study group had axillary exclusion while the other had the conventional procedure; total drain outputs were recorded daily for all patients prior to drain removal. The drains were removed when the daily drainage was less than 30 ml.ResultsThis study contains 64 patients, the study group contains 32 patients, and the control group contains 32 patients. Age, BMI (mean control = 31.7 and study = 30.2), and tumor size were of no significant differences to be more concise on the effect of axillary exclusion. The mean of day of drain removal in the control group was 17.8 day (15–19) with a mean of total drain output of 4525.6 ml (4430–3660 ml) while the mean in the study group of day of drain removal was 11.3 (10–13) with a mean of total drain output of 1476.2 ml (620–2200 ml), p < 0.00.ConclusionsAxillary exclusion technique is a valuable procedure that significantly decreases seroma postmastectomy and axillary dissection.
Introduction: Renal failure is one of the most serious complications of sickle cell diseases; it affects 5% – 18% and leads to early death. Protienuria is highly correlated with risk for future chronic renal failure. Aim: to estimate the prevalence of microalbuminuria among Egyptian children and adults with sickle hemoglobinopathy, and to evaluate the effect ACE inhibitor on positive cases. Subject and method: 60 patients (mean age 13.03±9.15) with sickle hemoglobinopathy were included. Patients were divided into 3 groups: sickle cell disease (group I) constituted 20%, Sickle ß-Thalassemia (group II) 46.6% and sickle cell trait (group III) 33.4%. Informed consent was obtained from patients and/or guardians and study approval by local IRB was obtained. Microalbuminuria was measured by turbidimetric assay in 24 hour urine collection. Patients with microalbuminuria were started on a 4 weeks trial of ACE inhibitor after excluding any contraindication for the drug. Patients were closely monitored for side effects and repeat microalbuminuria assay was done at the end of the trial period. Data were coded, entered and processed using SPSS (version 11). Results: The prevalence of microalbuminuria was 32.5% in sickle cell disease, and sickle β thalassemia while in sickle cell trait was 5 % (p=0.02). The highest level of microalbuminuria (93.3+-146.27) was observed in sickle cell disease patients followed by sickle β thalassemia (63.82+-172.38) followed by sickle cell trait(18.75+-12.86). Compared to patients with no microalbuminuria, the group with positive microalbuminuria was significantly older (18.31±4.48 vs. 9.24± 4.96 years), had higher number of blood transfusions / year (7.08±3.55 vs. 5.11±4.05), higher mean number of hemolytic crisis (2.38±1.98 vs. 1.11±1.19), higher mean number of pain crisis (2.92±1.61 vs. 2.2±1.48), and higher mean serum creatinine (0.63±0.31 vs. 0.47±0.19) (p<0.01). After 4 weeks trial of ACE inhibitor there was a statistically significant reduction (77.9% reduction) in number of cases with microalbuminuria as well as level of microalbuminuria (dropped from 171.91 ± 251.60 to 27.11 ± 13.99) (p= 0.005). Conclusion: Microalbuminuria is a significant problem among patients with sickle cell disease. ACE inhibitors have significant impact on improving microalbuminuria.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.