The E6 and E7 oncoproteins of the high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) types are able to immortalize human keratinocytes in vitro and likely contribute to the development of anogenital malignancies in vivo. The role of these oncoproteins in the productive viral life cycle, however, is not known. To begin to examine these possible roles, mutations in E6 were introduced in the context of the complete HPV 31 genome. Although transfected wild-type HPV 31 genomes, as well as genomes containing an E6 translation termination linker, an E6 frameshift mutation, and a point mutation in the p53 interacting domain were able to replicate in transient assays, only the wild-type genome was stably maintained as an episome. Interestingly, mutant genomes in either the E6 splice-donor site or splice-acceptor site were reduced in replication ability in transient assays; however, cotransfection of E1 and E2 expression vectors restored this function. In a similar fashion, genomes containing mutant HPV 31 E7 genes, including a translation termination mutant, two Rb-binding site mutants, a casein kinase II phosphorylation site mutant, and a transformation deficient mutant, were constructed. Although transient replication was similar to wild type in all of the E7 mutants, only the casein kinase II mutant had the ability to maintain high copies of episomal genomes. These findings suggest a role for E6 and E7 in the viral life cycle beyond their ability to extend the life span of infected cells.High-risk genital human papillomaviruses (HPVs) are the causative agents of cervical and other anogenital cancers (1, 2). This association is due, in part, to the ability of two of the viral gene products, E6 and E7, to target cellular proteins that regulate the cell cycle (3, 4). The most notable of these are p53 and Rb. E6 facilitates the degradation of p53 through its association with an accessory protein, E6-AP, a component of the ubiquitin-degradation pathway, whereas E7 binds to and disrupts the functions of Rb (5). Numerous studies have broadened our understanding of these interactions and confirmed the role of these oncoproteins in transformation, immortalization, and the induction of genomic instability (6, 7). In contrast, little information is available on the functions of E6 and E7 in the productive viral life cycle.The life cycle of HPV is closely associated with the differentiation program of the infected epithelial tissue (8). Consequent to infection, viral genomes replicate as episomes in basal cells coincident with cellular replication, maintaining copy number at Ϸ50 per cell. After cell division, the daughter cells leave the basal layer and begin to differentiate. As the cells reach the suprabasal layer, entry into S phase is induced, most likely through the action of the E7 protein (9, 10). This entry into S phase results in amplification of the viral genomes, expression of capsid proteins, and assembly of progeny virus in the outermost layer of the infected tissue (11).The E1 and E2 proteins of papillomaviruses have been...

No abstract

While the central role of the viral upstream regulatory region (URR) in the human papillomavirus (HPV) life cycle has been well established, its effects on viral replication factor expression and plasmid replication of HPV type 16 (HPV16) remain unclear. Some nonprototypic variants of HPV16 contain altered URR sequences and are considered to increase the oncogenic risk of infections. To determine the relationship between viral replication and variant URRs, hybrid viral genomes were constructed with the replication-competent HPV16 prototype W12 and analyzed in assays which recapitulate the different phases of normal viral replication. The establishment efficiencies of hybrid HPV16 genomes differed about 20-fold among European prototypes and variants from Africa and America. Generally, European and African genomes exhibited the lowest replication efficiencies. The high replication levels observed with American variants were primarily attributable to their efficient expression of the replication factors E1 and E2. The maintenance levels of these viral genomes varied about fivefold, which correlated with their respective establishment phenotypes and published P 97 activities. Vegetative DNA amplification could also be observed with replicating HPV16 genomes. These results indicate that efficient E1/E2 expression and elevated plasmid replication levels during the persistent stage of infection may comprise a risk factor in HPV16-mediated oncogenesis.Epidemiology. Infection with human papillomaviruses (HPVs) leads to hyperproliferative lesions in humans at specific anatomical sites which are determined by the tropism of individual viral genotypes. Among the more than 100 types of HPVs identified to date, a subset of mucosotropic viruses, which infect the epithelial lining of the anogenital tract and oral cavity, are causally associated with the great majority of cervical cancers worldwide. This group of high-risk HPVs includes HPV type 16 (HPV16), HPV18, HPV31, HPV33, and HPV35, with HPV16 being the most prevalent. In malignant anogenital lesions, high-risk HPV DNA is present in infected cells and the viral oncogenes are expressed detectably. While type 16 is also found in over 80% of HPV-positive head and neck cancers (39,40,54), and less frequently in HPV-positive cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas (64), its etiology in these diseases is still unclear. Over the past decade, numerous HPV16 variants have been identified which exhibit one or more single nucleotide changes compared to the European prototype E (19, 48, 60). Typically, L1, E6, and also upstream regulatory region (URR) sequences of HPV16 DNA from cervical cancers were analyzed (69, 70, 73) and variant classes established for different continents (73). Recent epidemiologic studies indicate that non-European variants of HPV16 exhibit increased oncogenicity (71, 72), specifically members of the Asian-American class AA (6). The underlying causes for the pathogenic differences of HPV16 variants, particularly those with altered URR sequences, are not well underst...

The E1 and E2 proteins are both required for papillomavirus DNA replication, and replication efficiency is controlled by the abundance of these factors. In human papillomaviruses (HPVs), the regulation of E1 and E2 expression and its effect on viral replication are not well understood. In particular, it is not known if E1 and E2 modulate their own expression and how posttranscriptional mechanisms may affect the levels of the replication proteins. Previous studies have implicated splicing within the E6 open reading frame (ORF) as being important for modulating replication of HPV type 31 (HPV31) through altered expression of E1 and E2. To analyze the function of the E6 intron in viral replication more specifically, we examined the effects of E6 splicing mutations in the context of entire viral genomes in transient assays. HPV31 genomes which had mutations in the splice donor site (E6SD) or the splice acceptor site (E6SA), a deletion of the intron (E6ID), or substituted heterologous intron sequences (E6IS) were constructed. Compared to wild-type (wt) HPV31, pHPV31-E6SD, -E6SA, and -E6IS replicated inefficiently while pHPV31-E6ID replicated at an intermediate level. Cotransfection of the E6 mutant genomes with an E1 expression vector strongly activated their replication levels, indicating that efficient expression of E1 requires E6 internal splicing. In contrast, replication was activated only moderately with an E2 expression vector. Replacing the wt E6 intron in HPV31 with a heterologous intron from simian virus 40 (E6SR2) resulted in replication levels similar to that of the wt in the absence of expression vectors, suggesting that mRNA splicing upstream of the E1 ORF is important for high-level replication. To examine the effects of E6 intron splicing on E1 and E2 expression directly, we constructed reporter DNAs in which the luciferase coding sequences were fused in frame to the E1 (E1Luc) or E2 (E2Luc) gene. Reporter activities were then analyzed in transient assays with cotransfected E1 or E2 expression vectors. Both reporters were moderately activated by E1 in a dose-dependent manner. In addition, E1Luc was activated by low doses of E2 but was repressed at high doses. In contrast, E2 had little effect on E2Luc activity. These data indicate that E1 expression and that of E2 are interdependent and regulated differentially. When the E6 splicing mutations were analyzed in both reporter backgrounds, only E1Luc activities correlated with splicing competence in the E6 ORF. These findings support the hypothesis that the E6 intron primarily regulates expression of E1. Finally, in long-term replication assays, none of the E6 mutant genomes could be stably maintained. However, cotransfection of the E6 splicing mutant genomes with pHPV31-E7NS, which contains a nonsense mutation in the E7 coding sequence, restored stable replication of some mutants. Our observations indicate that E1 expression and that of E2 are differentially regulated at multiple levels and that efficient expression of E1 is required for transient and st...

The viral replication factors E1 and E2 of papillomaviruses are necessary and sufficient to replicate plasmids containing the minimal origin of DNA replication in transient assays. Under physiological conditions, the upstream regulatory region (URR) governs expression of the early viral genes. To determine the effect of URR elements on E1 and E2 expression specifically, and on the regulation of DNA replication during the various phases of the viral life cycle, we carried out a systematic replication study with entire genomes of human papillomavirus type 31 (HPV31), a high-risk oncogenic type. We constructed a series of URR deletions, spacer replacements, and point mutations to analyze the role of the keratinocyte enhancer (KE) element, the auxiliary enhancer (AE) domain, and the L1-proximal end of the URR (5′-URR domain) in DNA replication during establishment, maintenance, and vegetative viral DNA amplification. Using transient and stable replication assays, we demonstrate that the KE and AE are necessary for efficient E1 and E2 gene expression and that the KE can also directly modulate viral replication. KE-mediated activation of replication is dependent on the position and orientation of the element. Mutation of either one of the four Ap1 sites, the single Sp1 site, or the binding site for the uncharacterized footprint factor 1 reduced replication efficiency through decreased expression of E1 and E2. Furthermore, the 5′-URR domain and the Oct1 DNA binding site are dispensable for viral replication, since such HPV31 mutants are able to replicate efficiently in a transient assay, maintain a stable copy number over several cell generations, and amplify viral DNA under vegetative conditions. Interestingly, deletion of the 5′-URR domain leads to increased transient and stable replication levels. These findings suggest that elements in the HPV31 URR outside the minimal origin modulate viral replication through both direct and indirect mechanisms.