ObjectiveTo analyze the predictive value of renal resistance index (RRI) and plasma cystatin C (pCysC) in pregnancy-related acute kidney injury (PR-AKI).MethodsThis study included 182 pregnant women admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) between May 2016 and June 2021. Intensivists who had received full-time bedside ultrasound Doppler training performed RRI measurements, and blood was drawn to monitor serum creatinine (Scr) and pCysC concentrations. The study continued for 3 consecutive days, marked as the first day, the second day, and the third day, during which the hourly urine output (UO) was monitored and recorded. According to the AKI diagnostic staging criteria, patients with AKI were divided into stages I, II, and III and comprised the study group (Group A), and patients without AKI served as the control group (Group B).ResultsOf the 182 enrolled patients, 35 (19.2%) were diagnosed with AKI, including 23 (65.7%) with stage I, 9 with stage II (25.7%), and 3 with stage III (8.6%). Three were excluded owing to the requirement of continuous blood purification. Therefore, 179 patients, 32 in Group A and 147 in Group B, were included. The Scr, pCysC, and RRI of Group A increased on the first, second, and third days, but there was a gradual decrease over time. Each period was compared with the corresponding period in Group B, and there were significant differences (P<0.05). All patients in Group A met the diagnostic criterion of Scr concentration in AKI, and only 34.4% of the patients met the diagnostic criterion of UO. According to the D1 monitoring results, the proportions of increased pCysC and RRI in Group A were 87.5% and 81.3%, respectively. They were significantly different from those in Group B (P<0.001). The three variables of pCysC, RRI, and the combination of pCysC and RRI all independently correlated with AKI. The sensitivity and specificity of pCysC concentration for the prediction of PR-AKI were 87.5% and 84.35%, respectively, and those of RRI were 81.25% and 76.87%, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of the combination of the two were 96.88% and 72.11%, respectively. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that these indicators had a significant predictive power for PR-AKI. Although the length of stay in the ICU and hospital in Group A was longer (P<0.05), there was no difference in hospital mortality between the two groups (P>0.05).ConclusionThe diagnosis of PR-AKI based only on Scr and UO was insufficient. RRI and pCysC were important supplements for diagnosing PR-AKI, with good sensitivity and specificity. However, combining the two was better.
Acute kidney injury (AKI) remains to be a common but severe complication after liver transplantation (LT). However, there are still few clinically validated biomarkers. A total of 214 patients who underwent routine furosemide (1–2 mg/kg) after LT were retrospectively included. The urine output during the first 6 h was recorded to evaluate the predictive value of AKI stage 3 and renal replacement therapy (RRT). 105 (49.07%) patients developed AKI, including 21 (9.81%) progression to AKI stage 3 and 10 (4.67%) requiring RRT. The urine output decreased with the increasing severity of AKI. The urine output of AKI stage 3 did not significantly increase after the use of furosemide. The area under the receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves for the total urine output in the first hour to predict progression to AKI stage 3 was 0.94 (p < 0.001). The ideal cutoff for predicting AKI progression during the first hour was a urine volume of less than 200 ml with a sensitivity of 90.48% and specificity of 86.53%. The area under the ROC curves for the total urine output in the six hours to predict progression to RRT was 0.944 (p < 0.001). The ideal cutoff was a urine volume of less than 500 ml with a sensitivity of 90% and specificity of 90.91%. Severe AKI after liver transplantation seriously affects the outcome of patients. Lack of furosemide responsiveness quickly and accurately predict AKI stage 3, and patients requiring RRT after the operation.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.