Abstract:In recent decades, most methods proposed for radiometric slope correction involved the backscattering intensity values in synthetic aperture radar (SAR) data. However, these methods are not fully applicable to quad-polarimetric SAR (PolSAR) matrix data. In this paper, we propose a three-step semi-empirical radiometric terrain correction approach for PolSAR forest area data. The three steps of terrain effects correction are: polarisation orientation angle (POA), effective scattering area (ESA), and angular variation effect (AVE) corrections. We propose a novel method to determine adaptively the "n" value in the third step by minimising the correlation coefficient between corrected backscattering coefficients and the local incidence angle; we then constructed the correction coefficients matrix and used it to correct PolSAR matrix data. PALSAR-2 HBQ (L-band, quad-polarisation) data were used to verify the proposed method. After three-step correction, differences between front and back slopes were significantly reduced. Our results indicate that POA, ESA, and AVE corrections are indispensable steps to producing PolSAR data. In the POA correction step, horizontal-vertical (HV) polarisation was maximally influenced by the POA shift. The max deviation of the POA correction was greater than 1 dB for HV polarisation and approximately 0.5 dB for HH/VV polarisation at an intermediate shift angle (±20 • ). Based on Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR)-derived forest aboveground biomass (AGB) data, we analysed the relationship between forest AGB and backscattering coefficient; the correlation was improved following the terrain correction. HV polarisation had the best correlation with forest AGB (R = 0.81) and the correlation improved by approximately 0.3 compared to the uncorrected data.
Growth parameters like biomass, leaf area index (LAI) and stem height play an import role for crop monitoring and yield prediction. Compact polarimetric (CP) SAR has shown great potential and similar performance to fully-polarimetric (FP) SAR in crop mapping and phenology retrieval, but its potential in growth parameters inversion has not been fully explored. In this paper, a time series of images of CP SAR was simulated from five FP SAR data gathered during the entire growth season of rape. CP response of 27 parameters, relying on Stokes parameters and their child parameters, decomposition parameters and backscattering coefficients, were extracted and investigated as a function of days after sowing (DAS) during the whole rape growth cycle to interpret their sensitivity to each growth parameter. Then, random forest (RF) was chosen as an automatic approach for the growth parameters inversion method, and its results were compared with traditional single-parameter regression models. Most of the CP parameters showed high sensitivity with growth parameters and great potential for growth parameters inversion. Among all of the regression models, the quadratic regression model showed the best performance for all of the growth parameters inversion, the best result for biomass inversion was the third component of the Stokes parameters (g 3 ) with R 2 of 0.765 and RMSE of 73.20 g/m 2 . For LAI and stem height was one of the Stokes child parameters, the circular polarization ratio (U c ), with R 2 of 0.857 and 0.923 and RMSE of 0.66 and 18.71 cm, respectively. RF showed the highest accuracy and smallest RMSE for all of three growth parameters inversion; R 2 for biomass, LAI and stem height were 0.93, 0.96 and 0.95, respectively; RMSE were 46.24 g/m 2 , 0.25 and 13.5 cm, respectively. However, there are also some CP parameters, which showed low sensitivity to growth parameters, that had high importance for RF inversion. The results confirmed the potential of CP data and the RF method in growth parameters inversion, but they also confirmed that it was difficult to give a physical interpretation for the RF inversion model.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.